Learning from new colorectal cancers: a qualitative synthesis of significant event reports.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0088
Nicola Cooper-Moss, Achint Bajpai, Neil Smith, Samuel William David Merriel, Umesh Chauhan
{"title":"Learning from new colorectal cancers: a qualitative synthesis of significant event reports.","authors":"Nicola Cooper-Moss, Achint Bajpai, Neil Smith, Samuel William David Merriel, Umesh Chauhan","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the UK and a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis provides opportunities for intervention and improved survival. Significant event analysis (SEA) is a well-established quality improvement method for learning from new cancer diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To provide additional insights into diagnostic processes for colorectal cancer and to identify areas for improvement in patient care pathways.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Fifty-three general practices across Pennine Lancashire, England, submitted one or more SEA reports as part of an incentivised scheme.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A standardised data collection form was used to collate learning points and recommendations for improvements. In total, 161 reports were analysed using an inductive framework analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an overarching theme of building vigilance and collaboration between and within general practices and secondary care. The following four main sub-themes were also identified: education; individualised and flexible care; ownership and continuity; and communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide additional insights into colorectal cancer pathways from a primary care perspective. Practices should be supported in developing protocols for assessment and follow-up of patients with varying presentations. Screening and access to investigations are paramount for improving early diagnosis; however, a flexible diagnostic approach is required according to the individual circumstances of each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the UK and a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early diagnosis provides opportunities for intervention and improved survival. Significant event analysis (SEA) is a well-established quality improvement method for learning from new cancer diagnoses.

Aim: To provide additional insights into diagnostic processes for colorectal cancer and to identify areas for improvement in patient care pathways.

Design & setting: Fifty-three general practices across Pennine Lancashire, England, submitted one or more SEA reports as part of an incentivised scheme.

Method: A standardised data collection form was used to collate learning points and recommendations for improvements. In total, 161 reports were analysed using an inductive framework analysis approach.

Results: There was an overarching theme of building vigilance and collaboration between and within general practices and secondary care. The following four main sub-themes were also identified: education; individualised and flexible care; ownership and continuity; and communication.

Conclusion: These findings provide additional insights into colorectal cancer pathways from a primary care perspective. Practices should be supported in developing protocols for assessment and follow-up of patients with varying presentations. Screening and access to investigations are paramount for improving early diagnosis; however, a flexible diagnostic approach is required according to the individual circumstances of each patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从新的结直肠癌中学习:重大事件报告的定性综述。
背景:在英国,结直肠癌是导致癌症相关死亡的第二大原因,也是全球发病率和死亡率的重要因素。早期诊断为干预和提高生存率提供了机会。重大事件分析(SEA)是一种行之有效的质量改进方法,用于从新的癌症诊断中吸取经验教训。目的:本研究旨在提供有关结直肠癌诊断过程的更多信息,并确定患者护理路径中需要改进的地方:英格兰宾夕法尼亚兰开夏郡的 53 家综合诊所提交了一份或多份 SEA 报告,作为激励计划的一部分:方法:使用标准化的数据收集表格整理学习要点和改进建议。采用归纳式框架分析方法对 161 份报告进行了分析:结果:总的主题是在全科医疗机构和二级医疗机构之间以及内部建立警惕性和协作关系。此外,还确定了四个主要次主题,包括教育、个性化和灵活的护理、所有权和连续性以及沟通:这些研究结果从初级医疗的角度为结肠直肠癌的治疗提供了新的视角。应支持医疗机构为不同表现的患者制定评估和随访方案。筛查和检查是提高早期诊断率的关键,但需要根据每位患者的具体情况采取灵活的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1