Pharmacist-led interventions in optimising the use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation in general practice in England: a retrospective observational study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0113
Raman Sharma, Syed Shahzad Hasan, Ishtiaq A Gilkar, Waheed F Hussain, Barbara R Conway, Muhammad Usman Ghori
{"title":"Pharmacist-led interventions in optimising the use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation in general practice in England: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Raman Sharma, Syed Shahzad Hasan, Ishtiaq A Gilkar, Waheed F Hussain, Barbara R Conway, Muhammad Usman Ghori","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the mainstay of treatment for the prevention of strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for increasing OAC in patients with AF. However, prescribing DOACs for patients with established AF poses various challenges and general practice pharmacists may have an important role in supporting their management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effectiveness of pharmacist-led interventions in general practice in optimising the use of OAC therapies in AF.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A retrospective observational study in general practices in Bradford.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The data were collected retrospectively from 1 November 2018-31 December 2019 using electronic health record data. The data were analysed: 1) to identify patients with AF not on OAC; 2) to describe inappropriate DOAC prescriptions; and 3) to calculate HAS-BLED scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 76.3% (<i>n</i> = 470) of patients with AF received OAC therapy, and of these, 63.4% received DOACs. Pharmacist-led interventions increased DOAC prescribing by 6.0% (<i>P =</i> 0.03). Inappropriate DOAC use was identified in 24.5% of patients with AF, with underdosed and overdosed identified in 9.7% and 14.8%, respectively. Post-intervention, inappropriate prescribing was reduced to 1.7%. The mean HAS-BLED score decreased from 3.00 to 2.22 (<i>P</i><0.01). Successful transition from vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy to DOACs was achieved in 25.7% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacist-led interventions have successfully improved the use of OAC therapies in patients with AF, and effectively managed the bleeding risks and transition from VKA to DOAC therapy, in line with guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300970/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the mainstay of treatment for the prevention of strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for increasing OAC in patients with AF. However, prescribing DOACs for patients with established AF poses various challenges and general practice pharmacists may have an important role in supporting their management.

Aim: To investigate the effectiveness of pharmacist-led interventions in general practice in optimising the use of OAC therapies in AF.

Design & setting: A retrospective observational study in general practices in Bradford.

Method: The data were collected retrospectively from 1 November 2018-31 December 2019 using electronic health record data. The data were analysed: 1) to identify patients with AF not on OAC; 2) to describe inappropriate DOAC prescriptions; and 3) to calculate HAS-BLED scores.

Results: Overall, 76.3% (n = 470) of patients with AF received OAC therapy, and of these, 63.4% received DOACs. Pharmacist-led interventions increased DOAC prescribing by 6.0% (P = 0.03). Inappropriate DOAC use was identified in 24.5% of patients with AF, with underdosed and overdosed identified in 9.7% and 14.8%, respectively. Post-intervention, inappropriate prescribing was reduced to 1.7%. The mean HAS-BLED score decreased from 3.00 to 2.22 (P<0.01). Successful transition from vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy to DOACs was achieved in 25.7% of patients.

Conclusion: Pharmacist-led interventions have successfully improved the use of OAC therapies in patients with AF, and effectively managed the bleeding risks and transition from VKA to DOAC therapy, in line with guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师主导的干预措施,优化英格兰全科医生对心房颤动患者口服抗凝药的使用:一项回顾性观察研究。
背景:口服抗凝剂(OAC)是心房颤动(AF)患者预防脑卒中的主要治疗手段。直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)在房颤患者的口服抗凝剂中占越来越大的比例。然而,为已确诊的心房颤动患者开具 DOACs 处方面临着各种挑战,而全科药剂师可能在支持患者管理方面发挥着重要作用。目的:调查全科药剂师主导的干预措施在优化心房颤动患者使用 OAC 疗法方面的有效性:在布拉德福德市中心全科诊所进行的一项回顾性观察研究,使用布拉德福德市中心全科诊所心房颤动患者的电子健康记录数据:使用电子健康记录数据回顾性收集2018年11月1日至2019年12月31日期间的数据。对数据进行分析:(i) 识别未使用 OAC 的房颤患者;(ii) 描述不适当的 DOACs 处方;(iii) 计算 HASBLED 评分:76%的房颤患者接受了 OAC 治疗,其中 48% 接受了 DOACs 治疗。药剂师主导的干预措施使 DOAC 的处方量增加了 6%(P=0.03)。25%的患者发现DOAC使用不当,用药不足和用药过量的比例分别为10%和15%。干预后,这一比例降至 1.5%。HASBLED 平均得分从 3.00 降至 2.22(P)。25.71%的患者成功地从VKA(维生素K拮抗剂)疗法过渡到了DOACs疗法:药剂师主导的干预措施成功改善了房颤患者对 OAC 疗法的使用,并有效控制了出血风险以及从 VKA 疗法向 DOAC 疗法的过渡,符合指南要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
General practice characteristics associated with pay-for-performance in the UK: a systematic review. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. Could a behaviour change intervention be used to address under-recognition of work-related asthma in primary care? A systematic review. Editorial: Global health inequity and primary care. Clinical decision making and risk appraisal using electronic risk assessment tools (eRATs) for cancer diagnosis: A qualitative study of GP experiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1