Bidirectional Longitudinal Association between Back Pain and Loneliness in Later Life: Evidence from English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.

IF 2.8 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-10 DOI:10.4235/agmr.23.0136
Yuta Suzuki, Tomoto Suzuki, Michiaki Takagi, Masayasu Murakami, Takaaki Ikeda
{"title":"Bidirectional Longitudinal Association between Back Pain and Loneliness in Later Life: Evidence from English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.","authors":"Yuta Suzuki, Tomoto Suzuki, Michiaki Takagi, Masayasu Murakami, Takaaki Ikeda","doi":"10.4235/agmr.23.0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examined the bidirectional and temporal-ordinal relationship between loneliness and back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 7,730 participants in waves 6 (2012-2013), 7 (2014-2015), and 8 (2016-2017) of the national English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were analyzed. Back pain was graded on a scale of 0-10 (0, no discomfort; 10, unbearable pain). Loneliness was measured using the Revised University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale. A targeted minimum loss-based estimator was used to examine the bidirectional longitudinal associations between back pain and loneliness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No loneliness in waves 6 and 7 (relative risk [RR]=0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.94), no loneliness in wave 6 but loneliness in wave 7 (RR=0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68), and loneliness in wave 6 but not in wave 7 (RR=0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86) were associated with significant risk reductions of back pain in wave 8 compared with the scenario of loneliness in waves 6 and 7. Mild back pain in wave 6 but moderate back pain (RR=0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.86) or severe back pain in wave 7 (RR=0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.72) showed a significant risk reduction of loneliness in wave 8 compared with severe back pain in waves 6 and 7.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Loneliness may be a risk factor for back pain, and back pain may be a risk factor for loneliness. The results of this study will inform the development of more effective interventions for loneliness and back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":44729,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","volume":" ","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10982446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.23.0136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examined the bidirectional and temporal-ordinal relationship between loneliness and back pain.

Methods: Data from 7,730 participants in waves 6 (2012-2013), 7 (2014-2015), and 8 (2016-2017) of the national English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were analyzed. Back pain was graded on a scale of 0-10 (0, no discomfort; 10, unbearable pain). Loneliness was measured using the Revised University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale. A targeted minimum loss-based estimator was used to examine the bidirectional longitudinal associations between back pain and loneliness.

Results: No loneliness in waves 6 and 7 (relative risk [RR]=0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.94), no loneliness in wave 6 but loneliness in wave 7 (RR=0.58; 95% CI, 0.50-0.68), and loneliness in wave 6 but not in wave 7 (RR=0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86) were associated with significant risk reductions of back pain in wave 8 compared with the scenario of loneliness in waves 6 and 7. Mild back pain in wave 6 but moderate back pain (RR=0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.86) or severe back pain in wave 7 (RR=0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.72) showed a significant risk reduction of loneliness in wave 8 compared with severe back pain in waves 6 and 7.

Conclusion: Loneliness may be a risk factor for back pain, and back pain may be a risk factor for loneliness. The results of this study will inform the development of more effective interventions for loneliness and back pain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚年背痛与孤独之间的双向纵向联系:来自英国老龄化纵向研究的证据。
背景:本研究探讨了孤独感与背痛之间的双向和时序关系:本研究探讨了孤独感与背痛之间的双向和时序关系:分析了英国全国老龄化纵向研究第 6 波(2012-2013 年)、第 7 波(2014-2015 年)和第 8 波(2016-2017 年)的 7730 名参与者的数据。背痛按 0-10 级评分(0,无不适感;10,疼痛难忍)。孤独感采用加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独感量表(Revised University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale)进行测量。采用基于最小损失的目标估计法来研究背痛与孤独感之间的双向纵向关系:结果:与第 6 波和第 7 波中存在孤独感的情况相比,第 6 波和第 7 波中不存在孤独感(相对风险 [RR]=0.76; 95% 置信区间 [CI],0.61-0.94)、第 6 波中不存在孤独感但第 7 波中存在孤独感(RR=0.58; 95% CI,0.50-0.68)、第 6 波中存在孤独感但第 7 波中不存在孤独感(RR=0.69; 95% CI,0.57-0.86)与第 8 波中背痛风险显著降低有关。与第 6 波和第 7 波的严重背痛相比,第 6 波的轻度背痛但第 7 波的中度背痛(RR=0.55;95% CI,0.35-0.86)或严重背痛(RR=0.49;95% CI,0.34-0.72)显示第 8 波的孤独感风险显著降低:结论:孤独可能是背痛的一个风险因素,而背痛可能是孤独的一个风险因素。这项研究的结果将为制定更有效的孤独和背痛干预措施提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impairment in activities of daily living and related factors in elderly patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis before hospitalization. Circulating BMP-7 Level is Independent of Sarcopenia in Older Asian Adults. Relationship between Muscle Mass and Muscle Strength with Bone Density in Older Adults: A Systematic Review. Perioperative Risk Factors for Postoperative Delirium in Non-Dementia Older Patients after Non-Cardiac Surgery and Anesthesia: A Prospective Study. Preoperative Geriatric Characteristics Associated with Changes in Postoperative Cognitive Function and Quality of Life: a Prospective, Observational Analytic Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1