EPA Consensus Project Paper: Do Implant- Supported/Retained Prostheses Improve the Quality of Life of Patients with Intraoral Maxillofacial Defects? - A Systematic Review.

IF 1.2 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2023-12-08 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2631Nayar10
S Nayar, K Butt, K Amin, R Salazar-Gamarra, J W Vere
{"title":"EPA Consensus Project Paper: Do Implant- Supported/Retained Prostheses Improve the Quality of Life of Patients with Intraoral Maxillofacial Defects? - A Systematic Review.","authors":"S Nayar, K Butt, K Amin, R Salazar-Gamarra, J W Vere","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2631Nayar10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited evidence available regarding patient satisfaction and quality of life assessment in patients with intraoral maxillofacial defects managed with maxillofacial prostheses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aims to understand the impact of intraoral implant prostheses in improving the quality of life in patients with intraoral maxillofacial defects/abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was performed of nine electronic databases from January 1970 to August 2022. Hand searching of the reference lists of the included papers and of relevant journal publications between 2012 and 2022 was also undertaken. Key information was extracted from included studies alongside quality and risk of bias assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systematic review encompassed a total of seven studies, comprising five retrospective and two prospective investigations, with one of the prospective studies being a randomised clinical trial. The evaluation of the risk of bias and quality assessment revealed heterogeneity in the results, preventing meaningful comparisons among the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitation of the systematic review, there is limited evidence to suggest that implant prostheses improve the quality of life in patients with intraoral maxillofacial defects or abnormalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2631Nayar10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence available regarding patient satisfaction and quality of life assessment in patients with intraoral maxillofacial defects managed with maxillofacial prostheses.

Objectives: This systematic review aims to understand the impact of intraoral implant prostheses in improving the quality of life in patients with intraoral maxillofacial defects/abnormalities.

Methods: A comprehensive search was performed of nine electronic databases from January 1970 to August 2022. Hand searching of the reference lists of the included papers and of relevant journal publications between 2012 and 2022 was also undertaken. Key information was extracted from included studies alongside quality and risk of bias assessments.

Results: The systematic review encompassed a total of seven studies, comprising five retrospective and two prospective investigations, with one of the prospective studies being a randomised clinical trial. The evaluation of the risk of bias and quality assessment revealed heterogeneity in the results, preventing meaningful comparisons among the included studies.

Conclusion: Within the limitation of the systematic review, there is limited evidence to suggest that implant prostheses improve the quality of life in patients with intraoral maxillofacial defects or abnormalities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EPA 共识项目文件:口内颌面部缺损患者的生活质量是否因种植体支持/固定假体而得到改善?- 系统回顾。
背景:关于口内颌面部缺损患者的满意度和生活质量评估,目前只有有限的证据:本系统综述旨在了解口内种植义齿对改善口内颌面部缺损/畸形患者生活质量的影响:对1970年1月至2022年8月期间的九个电子数据库进行了全面检索。此外,还手工检索了所纳入论文的参考文献目录以及 2012 年至 2022 年间的相关期刊出版物。从纳入的研究中提取关键信息,并进行质量和偏倚风险评估:系统综述共包括七项研究,其中五项为回顾性研究,两项为前瞻性研究,其中一项前瞻性研究为随机临床试验。对偏倚风险和质量评估的结果显示存在异质性,因此无法对纳入的研究进行有意义的比较:在系统综述的限制范围内,有有限的证据表明,口内颌面部缺损或畸形患者使用种植修复体可提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
A Narrative Review on the Survival and Success Rates of Dental Veneers in Contemporary Dentistry. The Effect of Various Remineralizing Agents on Post-bleaching Shade Stability: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Study. Evaluating the Long-Term Success of Removable and Fixed Prosthodontic Treatment in Completely Edentulous Patients: Comparative Clinical- Radiographic Study. Mandibular Advancement Devices for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Printed Versus Conventional Denture Base Resins: Physical- Mechanical Evaluation After Immersion in Beverages and Cleansers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1