COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION THROUGH ONLINE AND PHYSICAL ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRE IN ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTS.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-12-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220233105e268380
Andre Vitor Kerber Cavalcanti Lemos, Lucas Plens DE Britto Costa, Eduardo Souza Maciel, Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur, Moises Cohen
{"title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CLINICAL DATA COLLECTION THROUGH ONLINE AND PHYSICAL ELECTRONIC QUESTIONNAIRE IN ORTHOPEDIC PATIENTS.","authors":"Andre Vitor Kerber Cavalcanti Lemos, Lucas Plens DE Britto Costa, Eduardo Souza Maciel, Nacime Salomão Barbachan Mansur, Moises Cohen","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220233105e268380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The collection of clinical data is an essential step for the development of any scientific research. Online digital data collection can optimize this step.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the response rate and the accuracy of the clinical data collection date through the online and physical digital questionnaire in orthopedic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Comparative study, level III of evidence, with forty patients who had ankle sprains were evaluated, followed up for a period of 12 weeks with the application of physical and digital Visual Analogue Scale, Foot Function Index and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool questionnaires, and data were collected about the moment of collection of each questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We obtained a response rate of 83.3% in the digital collection group and 60% in the physical collection group (p < 0.05), and the response rate in the digital collection group was higher at all times of collection (3, 6 and 12 weeks). Analysis of the time of collection shows greater variability in the larger physical collection group at all times of the study (2.8 vs 1.5; 4.0 vs 2.4; 8.6 vs 1.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital data collection is effective for obtaining clinical data in patients with ankle sprains. <b><i>Level of Evidence III, Comparative, Prospective, Longitudinal Study in Parallel Groups.</i></b></p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"31 6","pages":"e268380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10726704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220233105e268380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The collection of clinical data is an essential step for the development of any scientific research. Online digital data collection can optimize this step.

Objective: To compare the response rate and the accuracy of the clinical data collection date through the online and physical digital questionnaire in orthopedic patients.

Methods: Comparative study, level III of evidence, with forty patients who had ankle sprains were evaluated, followed up for a period of 12 weeks with the application of physical and digital Visual Analogue Scale, Foot Function Index and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool questionnaires, and data were collected about the moment of collection of each questionnaire.

Results: We obtained a response rate of 83.3% in the digital collection group and 60% in the physical collection group (p < 0.05), and the response rate in the digital collection group was higher at all times of collection (3, 6 and 12 weeks). Analysis of the time of collection shows greater variability in the larger physical collection group at all times of the study (2.8 vs 1.5; 4.0 vs 2.4; 8.6 vs 1.5).

Conclusion: Digital data collection is effective for obtaining clinical data in patients with ankle sprains. Level of Evidence III, Comparative, Prospective, Longitudinal Study in Parallel Groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过在线电子问卷和物理电子问卷收集骨科患者临床数据的有效性对比分析。
收集临床数据是开展任何科学研究的必要步骤。在线数字数据收集可以优化这一步骤:比较骨科患者通过在线和物理数字问卷收集临床数据的响应率和准确性:比较研究,III级证据,对40名踝关节扭伤患者进行评估,应用物理和数字视觉模拟量表、足部功能指数和坎伯兰踝关节不稳定性工具问卷进行为期12周的随访,并收集有关每份问卷收集时间的数据:数字收集组的回复率为 83.3%,物理收集组为 60%(P < 0.05),数字收集组在所有收集时间(3、6 和 12 周)的回复率都更高。对收集时间的分析表明,在研究的所有时间段,物理收集组的变异性更大(2.8 vs 1.5;4.0 vs 2.4;8.6 vs 1.5):结论:数字数据采集能有效获取踝关节扭伤患者的临床数据。证据等级 III,平行组比较性、前瞻性、纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
期刊最新文献
OUTCOMES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF DIAPHYSEAL FEMUR FRACTURES IN POLYTRAUMATIZED CHILDREN. COMBINED TECHNIQUES OF CAUDAL EPIDURAL BLOCK AND TRANSFORAMINAL NERVE ROOT BLOCK IN THE TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE DISEASES OF THE LUMBAR SPINE: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS. DECREASED SURGICAL DURATION, LESS COMPLICATIONS, AND FASTER RETURN TO ACTIVITIES ACROSS THE LEARNING CURVE FOR THE ARTHROSCOPIC LATARJET TECHNIQUE. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH TIBIA DIAPHYSIS FRACTURE TREATED AT A TERTIARY LEVEL HOSPITAL. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE IN ONCOLOGIC-ORTHOPEDIC STUDIES - ACTA ORTOP BRAS (1993-2022).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1