Diameter and depth of femoral vessels by duplex ultrasound.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1177/11297298231200036
Benjamin R Zambetti, Aman Kankaria, Francia Fang, Nahye Kim, Khanjan Nagarsheth, Rajabrata Sarkar
{"title":"Diameter and depth of femoral vessels by duplex ultrasound.","authors":"Benjamin R Zambetti, Aman Kankaria, Francia Fang, Nahye Kim, Khanjan Nagarsheth, Rajabrata Sarkar","doi":"10.1177/11297298231200036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The anatomy of the femoral artery and vein plays an integral role in vascular access. Both technical feasibility and complication rates are associated with femoral vessel diameter and depth. The goal of this study is to establish normative values for common femoral artery (CFA) and vein (CFV) depth and diameter using a large, diverse patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all patients undergoing lower extremity venous duplex imaging over a 1 year period were reviewed. Patients with inadequate imaging or with evidence of deep vein thrombosis were excluded. The index image of all studies was a non-compressed view of the common femoral vein at the saphenous-femoral junction. All measurements were taken from this still. Vessel diameters were measured from intima to intima. Depth was measured from skin to intima. BMI and BSA were calculated using standard formulas. Chi square was used for univariate analysis. Linear regression was used to establish correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 1 year period, 983 patients met criteria for inclusion. The majority were male (53%) with a mean age of 55. The patients were 47% white and 44% black. The majority had hypertension (53%). The mean BMI and BSA were 29 and 2, respectively. Mean CFA depth was 1.7 cm, while mean CFV depth was 1.8 cm. The mean CFA and CFV diameters were 0.9 and 1.1 cm, respectively. Amongst height, weight, BMI, and BSA, weight correlated best with CFA (<i>R</i> = 0.548) and CFV (<i>R</i> = 0.552) depth, while BSA correlated best for diameter for both CFA (<i>R</i> = 0.390) and CFV (<i>R</i> = 0.440).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes mean diameters and depths for the common femoral artery and vein using a large, diverse patient group. BSA was most closely associated with vessel diameter, while weight was correlated with depth. This study provides normative diameter and depth values for the common femoral vasculature, which may assist in vascular access planning for providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"162-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231200036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The anatomy of the femoral artery and vein plays an integral role in vascular access. Both technical feasibility and complication rates are associated with femoral vessel diameter and depth. The goal of this study is to establish normative values for common femoral artery (CFA) and vein (CFV) depth and diameter using a large, diverse patient population.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing lower extremity venous duplex imaging over a 1 year period were reviewed. Patients with inadequate imaging or with evidence of deep vein thrombosis were excluded. The index image of all studies was a non-compressed view of the common femoral vein at the saphenous-femoral junction. All measurements were taken from this still. Vessel diameters were measured from intima to intima. Depth was measured from skin to intima. BMI and BSA were calculated using standard formulas. Chi square was used for univariate analysis. Linear regression was used to establish correlation.

Results: Over the 1 year period, 983 patients met criteria for inclusion. The majority were male (53%) with a mean age of 55. The patients were 47% white and 44% black. The majority had hypertension (53%). The mean BMI and BSA were 29 and 2, respectively. Mean CFA depth was 1.7 cm, while mean CFV depth was 1.8 cm. The mean CFA and CFV diameters were 0.9 and 1.1 cm, respectively. Amongst height, weight, BMI, and BSA, weight correlated best with CFA (R = 0.548) and CFV (R = 0.552) depth, while BSA correlated best for diameter for both CFA (R = 0.390) and CFV (R = 0.440).

Conclusions: This study establishes mean diameters and depths for the common femoral artery and vein using a large, diverse patient group. BSA was most closely associated with vessel diameter, while weight was correlated with depth. This study provides normative diameter and depth values for the common femoral vasculature, which may assist in vascular access planning for providers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过双工超声检查股血管的直径和深度。
背景:股动脉和静脉的解剖结构在血管通路中起着不可或缺的作用。技术可行性和并发症发生率都与股血管直径和深度有关。本研究的目的是利用大量不同的患者群体,确定股总动脉(CFA)和静脉(CFV)深度和直径的标准值:方法: 对一年内接受下肢静脉双相成像的所有患者进行回顾性复查。排除了成像不全或有深静脉血栓证据的患者。所有研究的索引图像都是股总静脉在大隐-股交界处的非压缩视图。所有测量均以此为基础进行。血管直径从内膜到内膜进行测量。深度从皮肤到内膜测量。BMI 和 BSA 采用标准公式计算。奇平方用于单变量分析。线性回归用于建立相关性:在一年的时间里,共有 983 名患者符合纳入标准。大多数患者为男性(53%),平均年龄为 55 岁。47%的患者为白人,44%为黑人。大多数患者患有高血压(53%)。平均体重指数(BMI)和体重指数(BSA)分别为 29 和 2。平均 CFA 深度为 1.7 厘米,平均 CFV 深度为 1.8 厘米。CFA 和 CFV 的平均直径分别为 0.9 厘米和 1.1 厘米。在身高、体重、BMI 和 BSA 中,体重与 CFA(R = 0.548)和 CFV(R = 0.552)深度的相关性最好,而 BSA 与 CFA(R = 0.390)和 CFV(R = 0.440)直径的相关性最好:这项研究利用一个大型、多样化的患者群体,确定了股总动脉和静脉的平均直径和深度。BSA与血管直径的关系最为密切,而体重则与深度相关。这项研究为股总动脉血管的直径和深度提供了标准值,有助于医疗机构制定血管通路计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheters in general pediatric wards. Staged surgical salvage of an abandoned hemodialysis graft due to small inflow artery variant. Study protocol for paradigm shift in vascular access creation: The VAC study. Utility of the BeBack re-entry catheter to treat resistant cephalic arch occlusion in a haemodialysis patient: Case report and review of the literature. Comparing static versus dynamic ultrasound techniques: A randomized pilot trial of novice and advanced users.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1