Psychometric Properties of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey-9 in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1097/NJH.0000000000001007
Seongkum Heo, Sun Hwa Kim, Ran Heo, KyungAh Cho, Jisun Yang, Hee Ryang Kim, Minjeong An, JungHee Kang, JinShil Kim
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey-9 in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases.","authors":"Seongkum Heo, Sun Hwa Kim, Ran Heo, KyungAh Cho, Jisun Yang, Hee Ryang Kim, Minjeong An, JungHee Kang, JinShil Kim","doi":"10.1097/NJH.0000000000001007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey-9 Korean version in patients with cardiovascular diseases or metabolic syndrome. In this cross-sectional study, data on advance care planning engagement, registration of advance directives and the intention, and sociodemographic characteristics were collected from 105 patients (mean age, 66.3 years) at 4 medical institutions. Cronbach α was used to test the reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis and independent t tests were used to test the validity. Cronbach α s for the total scale and the self-efficacy and readiness dimensions were .93, .82, and .97, respectively. In confirmatory factor analysis with 2 factors, all indices of model fit were acceptable: comparative fit index, 0.995; Tucker-Lewis index, 0.989; standardized root-mean-square residual, 0.024; root-mean-square error of approximation, 0.059; and factor loadings > 0.65. Patients who registered advance directives ( P < .001) or had the intention ( P < .001) had higher scores of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey-9 Korean version than their counterparts. The findings demonstrate that the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey-9 Korean version was a reliable and valid instrument. Health care providers, including nurses, can use this instrument to assess and manage advance care planning engagement in Korean patients with cardiovascular diseases or metabolic syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":54807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NJH.0000000000001007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey-9 Korean version in patients with cardiovascular diseases or metabolic syndrome. In this cross-sectional study, data on advance care planning engagement, registration of advance directives and the intention, and sociodemographic characteristics were collected from 105 patients (mean age, 66.3 years) at 4 medical institutions. Cronbach α was used to test the reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis and independent t tests were used to test the validity. Cronbach α s for the total scale and the self-efficacy and readiness dimensions were .93, .82, and .97, respectively. In confirmatory factor analysis with 2 factors, all indices of model fit were acceptable: comparative fit index, 0.995; Tucker-Lewis index, 0.989; standardized root-mean-square residual, 0.024; root-mean-square error of approximation, 0.059; and factor loadings > 0.65. Patients who registered advance directives ( P < .001) or had the intention ( P < .001) had higher scores of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey-9 Korean version than their counterparts. The findings demonstrate that the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey-9 Korean version was a reliable and valid instrument. Health care providers, including nurses, can use this instrument to assess and manage advance care planning engagement in Korean patients with cardiovascular diseases or metabolic syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管和代谢性疾病预先护理计划参与调查-9 的心理测量特性
本研究旨在测试心血管疾病或代谢综合征患者预先医疗计划参与度调查-9 韩国版的可靠性和有效性。在这项横断面研究中,研究人员收集了 4 家医疗机构的 105 名患者(平均年龄 66.3 岁)的预先医疗规划参与度、预先医疗指示登记和意向以及社会人口学特征的数据。采用 Cronbach α 检验信度。确认性因子分析和独立 t 检验用于检验有效性。总量表、自我效能感和准备度维度的 Cronbach α 分别为 0.93、0.82 和 0.97。在包含 2 个因子的确认性因子分析中,所有模型拟合指数均可接受:比较拟合指数为 0.995;Tucker-Lewis 指数为 0.989;标准化均方根残差为 0.024;均方根近似误差为 0.059;因子载荷大于 0.65。登记预先医疗指示(P < .001)或有此意向(P < .001)的患者在韩国版预先医疗规划参与调查-9 中的得分高于同类患者。研究结果表明,韩国版《预先护理计划参与度调查-9》是一款可靠有效的工具。包括护士在内的医疗服务提供者可以使用该工具来评估和管理韩国心血管疾病或代谢综合征患者的预先医疗规划参与度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing (JHPN) is the official journal of the Hospice & Palliative Nurses Association and is the professional, peer-reviewed journal for nurses in hospice and palliative care settings. Focusing on the clinical, educational and research aspects of care, JHPN offers current and reliable information on end of life nursing. Feature articles in areas such as symptom management, ethics, and futility of care address holistic care across the continuum. Book and article reviews, clinical updates and case studies create a journal that meets the didactic and practical needs of the nurse caring for patients with serious illnesses in advanced stages.
期刊最新文献
Association News. Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Position Statement: Medical Aid in Dying. Improving Patient-Centered Care for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients at a Community Palliative Setting. The Impact of Allyship on Minoritized Patients and Providers in Palliative Practice. True North.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1