Prevalence & Risk Factors for Perinatal Stroke: A Population-Based Study.

Child neurology open Pub Date : 2023-12-17 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2329048X231217691
Bithi Roy, Annabel Webb, Karen Walker, Catherine Morgan, Nadia Badawi, Carlos Nunez, Guy Eslick, Alison L Kent, Rod W Hunt, Mark T Mackay, Iona Novak
{"title":"Prevalence & Risk Factors for Perinatal Stroke: A Population-Based Study.","authors":"Bithi Roy, Annabel Webb, Karen Walker, Catherine Morgan, Nadia Badawi, Carlos Nunez, Guy Eslick, Alison L Kent, Rod W Hunt, Mark T Mackay, Iona Novak","doi":"10.1177/2329048X231217691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study objective was to calculate the birth prevalence of perinatal stroke and examine risk factors in term infants. Some risk factors are present in healthy infants, making it difficult to determine at-risk infants.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective population-based perinatal stroke data were compared to the Australian general population data using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty perinatal stroke cases were reported between 2017 and 2019. Estimated stroke prevalence was 9.6/100,000 live births/year including 5.8 for neonatal arterial ischemic stroke and 2.9 for neonatal hemorrhagic stroke. Eighty seven percent had multiple risk factors. Significant risk factors were cesarean section (<i>p</i> = 0.04), 5-min Apgar score <7 (<i>p</i> < 0.01), neonatal resuscitation (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and nulliparity (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Statistically significant independent risk factors do not fully explain the cause of perinatal stroke, because they are not a direct causal pathway to stroke. These data now require validation in a case-control study.</p>","PeriodicalId":72572,"journal":{"name":"Child neurology open","volume":"10 ","pages":"2329048X231217691"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10729630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child neurology open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2329048X231217691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study objective was to calculate the birth prevalence of perinatal stroke and examine risk factors in term infants. Some risk factors are present in healthy infants, making it difficult to determine at-risk infants.

Study design: Prospective population-based perinatal stroke data were compared to the Australian general population data using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: Sixty perinatal stroke cases were reported between 2017 and 2019. Estimated stroke prevalence was 9.6/100,000 live births/year including 5.8 for neonatal arterial ischemic stroke and 2.9 for neonatal hemorrhagic stroke. Eighty seven percent had multiple risk factors. Significant risk factors were cesarean section (p = 0.04), 5-min Apgar score <7 (p < 0.01), neonatal resuscitation (p < 0.01) and nulliparity (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Statistically significant independent risk factors do not fully explain the cause of perinatal stroke, because they are not a direct causal pathway to stroke. These data now require validation in a case-control study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期中风的发病率和风险因素:基于人口的研究。
研究目的研究目的是计算围产期中风的出生患病率并检查足月儿的风险因素。某些风险因素在健康婴儿中也存在,因此很难确定高危婴儿:研究设计:采用卡方检验、费雪精确检验和多变量逻辑回归分析,将基于人群的前瞻性围产期中风数据与澳大利亚普通人群数据进行比较:2017年至2019年期间报告了60例围产期中风病例。估计中风发病率为 9.6/100,000 活产/年,其中新生儿动脉缺血性中风为 5.8,新生儿出血性中风为 2.9。87%的新生儿有多种风险因素。显著的风险因素是剖宫产(p = 0.04)、5 分钟 Apgar 评分 p p p 结论:具有统计学意义的独立危险因素并不能完全解释围产期中风的原因,因为它们不是中风的直接因果途径。这些数据现在需要在病例对照研究中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Refractory Jeavons Syndrome from Birth Symptomatic to PLCB1 Mutation". Recurrent Spinal Arteriovenous Malformations in a Patient with Cobb Syndrome. “Oh My Sleeping Child” … Narcolepsy Type 1 in a 22-Month-Old Boy Cortical Hand Knob Paradoxical Thromboembolic Stroke in an Adolescent with Secundum Atrial Septal Defect and Paget-Schroetter Syndrome A Severe Case of Streptococcus pneumoniae Meningoencephalitis in an Infant Resulting in Fatal Strokes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1