Community Groups Co-Design Evidence-Based Docudramas to Communicate About Child Spacing in Bauchi State, Nigeria: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Umaira Ansari, Khalid Omer, Yagana Gidado, Muhd Chadi Baba, Adamu Ibrahim Gamawa, Lois Ezekiel Daniel, Neil Andersson, Anne Cockcroft
{"title":"Community Groups Co-Design Evidence-Based Docudramas to Communicate About Child Spacing in Bauchi State, Nigeria: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.","authors":"Umaira Ansari, Khalid Omer, Yagana Gidado, Muhd Chadi Baba, Adamu Ibrahim Gamawa, Lois Ezekiel Daniel, Neil Andersson, Anne Cockcroft","doi":"10.1177/2752535X231221594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Bauchi State, northern Nigeria, communities recognise short birth interval (<i>kunika</i> in the Hausa language) as harmful, but family planning is a sensitive topic. This paper describes the development of a culturally safe way to communicate about <i>kunika</i> in a conservative Muslim setting. The objective was to co-design culturally safe communication material, based on local knowledge about short birth interval, to share with women and men in households.Six community co-design groups of women and six of men (total 96 participants) reviewed summaries of their previously created maps of perceived local causes of <i>kunika,</i> categorised as frequent sex, family dynamics and non-use of contraception. They advised how these causes could be discussed effectively and acceptably with women and their husbands in households and suggested storylines for three short video docudramas about the prevention of <i>kunika.</i> The research team created the docudramas with a local producer and fieldworkers piloted their use in households.The design groups advised that communication materials should focus on child spacing rather than on limitation of family size. Even sensitive issues could be covered. People would not change their sexual behaviour but could be advised to use contraceptives to prevent <i>kunika</i>. The groups approved the final videos and six focus groups of visited women and men reported they were acceptable and helpful. Community co-design of communication about <i>kunika</i> was feasible and led to videos about a sensitive topic that were acceptable to ordinary men and women in communities in Bauchi.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X231221594"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231221594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Bauchi State, northern Nigeria, communities recognise short birth interval (kunika in the Hausa language) as harmful, but family planning is a sensitive topic. This paper describes the development of a culturally safe way to communicate about kunika in a conservative Muslim setting. The objective was to co-design culturally safe communication material, based on local knowledge about short birth interval, to share with women and men in households.Six community co-design groups of women and six of men (total 96 participants) reviewed summaries of their previously created maps of perceived local causes of kunika, categorised as frequent sex, family dynamics and non-use of contraception. They advised how these causes could be discussed effectively and acceptably with women and their husbands in households and suggested storylines for three short video docudramas about the prevention of kunika. The research team created the docudramas with a local producer and fieldworkers piloted their use in households.The design groups advised that communication materials should focus on child spacing rather than on limitation of family size. Even sensitive issues could be covered. People would not change their sexual behaviour but could be advised to use contraceptives to prevent kunika. The groups approved the final videos and six focus groups of visited women and men reported they were acceptable and helpful. Community co-design of communication about kunika was feasible and led to videos about a sensitive topic that were acceptable to ordinary men and women in communities in Bauchi.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在尼日利亚包奇州,社区团体共同设计以证据为基础的纪录片,宣传生育间隔:定性描述研究。
在尼日利亚北部的包奇州,社区认为生育间隔短(豪萨语中的 kunika)是有害的,但计划生育是一个敏感话题。本文介绍了如何在保守的穆斯林环境中开发一种文化上安全的方式来宣传 kunika。六个由女性和男性组成的社区共同设计小组(共 96 名参与者)审查了他们之前绘制的关于当地造成 kunika 的原因的地图摘要,这些原因被归类为频繁的性生活、家庭动态和不使用避孕措施。他们建议如何在家庭中与妇女及其丈夫有效且可接受地讨论这些原因,并为三部关于预防库妮卡的视频短片提出了故事情节建议。设计小组建议,宣传材料应侧重于生育间隔,而不是限制家庭规模。即使是敏感问题也可以涉及。人们不会改变他们的性行为,但可以建议他们使用避孕药具来预防 kunika。这些小组批准了最终的视频,六个焦点小组的受访妇女和男子都表示这些视频是可以接受和有帮助的。由社区共同设计有关 kunika 的宣传方式是可行的,这使得有关敏感话题的视频能够为包奇社区的普通男性和女性所接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'We're More Prepared than Before when we're hit': Understanding the Strategies Used by a Non-governmental Organization During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Sub-Saharan Africa. Health-Related Social Needs Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Their Caregivers: An Exploratory Study Using Human-Centered Design. Liberal/Individualized Versus Materialist/Structuralist Approaches to Addressing Social and Health Inequalities: Education and Income as Social Determinants of Health. Community Views of Determinants of Men's Wellbeing in Guatemala: A Study Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping. Community Engagement in the BE SAGE Project: Reducing COVID-19 in Hispanic and Low-Income Preschoolers via Testing and Open-Air Garden-Based Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1