A Quality Improvement Project to Improve the Utilization of an Intraoperative Rapid Response System.

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2023-12-12 eCollection Date: 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000686
Asheen Rama, Daniel Qian, Ty Forbes, Ellen Wang, Lynda Knight, Marc Berg, Thomas J Caruso
{"title":"A Quality Improvement Project to Improve the Utilization of an Intraoperative Rapid Response System.","authors":"Asheen Rama, Daniel Qian, Ty Forbes, Ellen Wang, Lynda Knight, Marc Berg, Thomas J Caruso","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid response teams (RRTs) improve morbidity by reducing the incidence of cardiac arrests. Although providers commonly activate RRTs on acute care wards, they are infrequently used perioperatively. At our institution, two intraoperative calls for help exist: staff assists (SAs) and code blues (CBs). The SA functions analogously to an RRT, and the CB indicates cardiopulmonary arrest. Given the success of RRTs, this project aimed to increase the use of the SA system. Our primary goal was to increase the ratio of SA to CB alerts by 50% within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quality improvement team led this project at an academic pediatric hospital in Northern California. The team analyzed the current state and identified an achievable goal. After developing key drivers, they implemented monthly simulations to teach providers the signs of clinical deterioration and to practice activating the SA system. In addition to measuring the ratio of SA to CB alerts, the team surveyed the etiologies of SA and measured process satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before the introduction of this initiative, the ratio of SA to CB alerts were 1:13.3. These improvements efforts led to an increase of SA to CB alerts to 1.5:1 (<i>P</i> = 0.0003). Twenty-three anesthesiologists provided etiologies for SA, reporting laryngospasm as the most common reason (30.4%). Nineteen nurses completed the SA survey and reported high satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This project successfully increased the utilization of a rapid response protocol in a pediatric perioperative setting using improvement methodologies and a simulation-based educational program.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid response teams (RRTs) improve morbidity by reducing the incidence of cardiac arrests. Although providers commonly activate RRTs on acute care wards, they are infrequently used perioperatively. At our institution, two intraoperative calls for help exist: staff assists (SAs) and code blues (CBs). The SA functions analogously to an RRT, and the CB indicates cardiopulmonary arrest. Given the success of RRTs, this project aimed to increase the use of the SA system. Our primary goal was to increase the ratio of SA to CB alerts by 50% within 6 months.

Methods: A quality improvement team led this project at an academic pediatric hospital in Northern California. The team analyzed the current state and identified an achievable goal. After developing key drivers, they implemented monthly simulations to teach providers the signs of clinical deterioration and to practice activating the SA system. In addition to measuring the ratio of SA to CB alerts, the team surveyed the etiologies of SA and measured process satisfaction.

Results: Before the introduction of this initiative, the ratio of SA to CB alerts were 1:13.3. These improvements efforts led to an increase of SA to CB alerts to 1.5:1 (P = 0.0003). Twenty-three anesthesiologists provided etiologies for SA, reporting laryngospasm as the most common reason (30.4%). Nineteen nurses completed the SA survey and reported high satisfaction.

Conclusion: This project successfully increased the utilization of a rapid response protocol in a pediatric perioperative setting using improvement methodologies and a simulation-based educational program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高术中快速反应系统使用率的质量改进项目。
导言:快速反应小组(RRT)可降低心脏骤停的发生率,从而改善发病率。虽然医疗服务提供者通常会在急症病房启动 RRT,但在围手术期却很少使用。在我们医院,术中有两种求救方式:工作人员协助(SA)和蓝色代码(CB)。SA 的功能类似于 RRT,而 CB 则表示心肺骤停。鉴于 RRT 的成功,该项目旨在提高 SA 系统的使用率。我们的主要目标是在 6 个月内将 SA 与 CB 警报的比例提高 50%:北加州一家学术儿科医院的质量改进小组领导了该项目。团队分析了现状,并确定了可实现的目标。在制定了关键驱动因素后,他们实施了每月模拟教学,向医疗服务提供者传授临床恶化的迹象,并练习启动 SA 系统。除了测量 SA 与 CB 警报的比例外,该团队还调查了 SA 的病因,并测量了流程满意度:结果:在引入这一举措之前,SA 与 CB 警报的比例为 1:13.3。这些改进措施将 SA 与 CB 警报的比例提高到了 1.5:1(P = 0.0003)。23 名麻醉师提供了 SA 的病因,其中喉痉挛是最常见的原因(30.4%)。19名护士完成了SA调查,并表示非常满意:该项目采用改进方法和模拟教育计划,成功提高了儿科围手术期快速反应方案的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Duplicate Inflammatory Marker Use. How Super Is Supertrack? Expediting Care of Fast-track Patients through a Pediatric Emergency Department. Integrating Emotional Health Assessments into Pediatric Care: Initial Learnings from an MOC Part 4 Activity. Focused Team Engagements to Enhance Interprofessional Collaboration and Safety Behaviors among Novice Nurses and Medical Residents. Sustainability of a PICU Situation Awareness Intervention: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1