Carotid Flow Time Compared with Invasive Monitoring as a Predictor of Volume Responsiveness in ICU patients.

POCUS journal Pub Date : 2023-11-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16545
Tomislav Jelic, Jordan Chenkin
{"title":"Carotid Flow Time Compared with Invasive Monitoring as a Predictor of Volume Responsiveness in ICU patients.","authors":"Tomislav Jelic, Jordan Chenkin","doi":"10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b><b>:</b> Identifying patients who will have an increase in their cardiac output from volume administration is difficult to identify. We propose the use of carotid flow time, which is a non-invasive means to determine if a patient is volume responsive. <b>Methods</b><b>:</b> Patients admitted to a critical care unit with a pulmonary artery catheter in place were enrolled. We perform a carotid flow time and pulmonary artery catheter measurement of cardiac output pre and post-passive leg raise and comparing the two. An increase of 10% change in the pre- vs. post-passive leg raise measurement would be indicative of a patient who is volume responsive. <b>Results</b><b>:</b> We identified 8 patients who were volume responsive as determined by the gold standard pulmonary artery catheter. The sensitivity 87.5% and specificity 90.9%. Pearson correlation coefficient between PA-CO measurements and CFT was r=0.8316, indicative of strong correlation between the two measurements. <b>Conclusion</b><b>:</b> In our patient sample of critically ill patients with pulmonary artery catheters, we found a strong correlation between corrected carotid flow times and cardiac output measurements from pulmonary artery catheters.</p>","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"212-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10723903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Identifying patients who will have an increase in their cardiac output from volume administration is difficult to identify. We propose the use of carotid flow time, which is a non-invasive means to determine if a patient is volume responsive. Methods: Patients admitted to a critical care unit with a pulmonary artery catheter in place were enrolled. We perform a carotid flow time and pulmonary artery catheter measurement of cardiac output pre and post-passive leg raise and comparing the two. An increase of 10% change in the pre- vs. post-passive leg raise measurement would be indicative of a patient who is volume responsive. Results: We identified 8 patients who were volume responsive as determined by the gold standard pulmonary artery catheter. The sensitivity 87.5% and specificity 90.9%. Pearson correlation coefficient between PA-CO measurements and CFT was r=0.8316, indicative of strong correlation between the two measurements. Conclusion: In our patient sample of critically ill patients with pulmonary artery catheters, we found a strong correlation between corrected carotid flow times and cardiac output measurements from pulmonary artery catheters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将颈动脉血流时间与侵入性监测相比,作为 ICU 患者血容量反应性的预测指标。
目标:很难确定哪些患者的心输出量会因容量管理而增加。我们建议使用颈动脉血流时间,这是确定患者是否对容量有反应的一种非侵入性方法。方法我们选取了入住重症监护病房并安装了肺动脉导管的患者。我们对被动抬腿前后的心输出量进行颈动脉流速时间和肺动脉导管测量,并将两者进行比较。被动抬腿前与被动抬腿后的测量值若增加 10%,则表明患者对容量有反应。结果:通过金标准肺动脉导管的测定,我们确定了 8 名患者有容量反应。敏感性为 87.5%,特异性为 90.9%。PA-CO 测量值与 CFT 之间的皮尔逊相关系数为 r=0.8316,表明这两种测量值之间具有很强的相关性。结论在使用肺动脉导管的重症患者样本中,我们发现颈动脉血流校正时间与肺动脉导管的心输出量测量值之间存在很强的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Application of Point of Care Ultrasound to Screen for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Narrative Review VExUS to Guide Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis: Exploring a Novel Dimension of Point of Care Ultrasound Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Return of the Living Dead Gut – A Case Report of Ischemic Colitis Identified on Point of Care Ultrasound Emergency Physician Performed Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Paracentesis: A Retrospective Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1