Lessons learned from the Alberta Border Testing Pilot Program.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2023-11-24 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2023.1220027
Jaling Kersen, Tayler D Scory, Oluwasefunmi Akeju, Robert G Weaver, Lianne Barnieh, Paul E Ronksley, Jenine Leal, Dean Blue, Erin O'Neill, David J T Campbell, Marcello Tonelli, Meaghan Lunney
{"title":"Lessons learned from the Alberta Border Testing Pilot Program.","authors":"Jaling Kersen, Tayler D Scory, Oluwasefunmi Akeju, Robert G Weaver, Lianne Barnieh, Paul E Ronksley, Jenine Leal, Dean Blue, Erin O'Neill, David J T Campbell, Marcello Tonelli, Meaghan Lunney","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2023.1220027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, countries implemented border control and quarantine measures to reduce transmission. The Alberta Border Testing Pilot Program (ABTPP) allowed international travellers entering Alberta to reduce their quarantine period following two negative COVID-19 tests. We evaluated participant experiences with the ABTPP and implementation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used a parallel convergent mixed-methods design to explore participant experiences through electronic web-based questionnaires (<i>n</i> = 21,089; <i>n</i> = 13,839) and semi-structured telephone interviews (<i>n</i> = 30). We evaluated implementation through three staff focus groups (<i>n</i> = 11). We analysed questionnaires using descriptive statistics and analysed interviews using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. We deductively coded focus group data using the 2009 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires indicated minimal issues with registration forms (91.7%), symptom reports (95.5%), and COVID-19 testing (95.7%). Most respondents (95.1%) expressed willingness to participate in the ABTPP again. Interviews revealed three themes related to participant experience: program efficiency, clarity of information, and requisite effort. Focus groups identified key implementation facilitators including the single health information system, strong stakeholder partnerships, and good communication across partnerships. Barriers included program complexity, implementation timeline, and evolving external context.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Participants reported high satisfaction with the ABTPP. Border testing programs should have high efficiency, require low effort, and use messaging that is clear and consistent. The effective implementation of border testing programs may be facilitated by strong leadership, adaptability, automated components, good communication, and simple technology. Learnings from participants and staff may help improve the implementation of border control programs for future pandemics or other emergencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ABTTP was a novel border control measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our evaluation of both participant and staff experiences demonstrated high levels of traveller satisfaction and identified areas for improvement that can inform the development of future border control measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"3 ","pages":"1220027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1220027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, countries implemented border control and quarantine measures to reduce transmission. The Alberta Border Testing Pilot Program (ABTPP) allowed international travellers entering Alberta to reduce their quarantine period following two negative COVID-19 tests. We evaluated participant experiences with the ABTPP and implementation.

Method: We used a parallel convergent mixed-methods design to explore participant experiences through electronic web-based questionnaires (n = 21,089; n = 13,839) and semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 30). We evaluated implementation through three staff focus groups (n = 11). We analysed questionnaires using descriptive statistics and analysed interviews using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. We deductively coded focus group data using the 2009 Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Results: Questionnaires indicated minimal issues with registration forms (91.7%), symptom reports (95.5%), and COVID-19 testing (95.7%). Most respondents (95.1%) expressed willingness to participate in the ABTPP again. Interviews revealed three themes related to participant experience: program efficiency, clarity of information, and requisite effort. Focus groups identified key implementation facilitators including the single health information system, strong stakeholder partnerships, and good communication across partnerships. Barriers included program complexity, implementation timeline, and evolving external context.

Discussion: Participants reported high satisfaction with the ABTPP. Border testing programs should have high efficiency, require low effort, and use messaging that is clear and consistent. The effective implementation of border testing programs may be facilitated by strong leadership, adaptability, automated components, good communication, and simple technology. Learnings from participants and staff may help improve the implementation of border control programs for future pandemics or other emergencies.

Conclusions: The ABTTP was a novel border control measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our evaluation of both participant and staff experiences demonstrated high levels of traveller satisfaction and identified areas for improvement that can inform the development of future border control measures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从艾伯塔省边境测试试点项目中汲取的经验教训。
背景:在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,各国实施了边境控制和检疫措施以减少传播。艾伯塔省边境检测试点计划(ABTPP)允许进入艾伯塔省的国际旅客在两次 COVID-19 检测呈阴性后缩短隔离期。我们评估了参与者对 ABTPP 的体验和实施情况:我们采用平行收敛混合方法设计,通过电子网络问卷调查(n = 21,089; n = 13,839)和半结构化电话访谈(n = 30)了解参与者的体验。我们通过三个员工焦点小组(n = 11)对实施情况进行了评估。我们使用描述性统计对问卷进行了分析,并使用归纳和演绎主题分析对访谈进行了分析。我们使用 2009 年实施研究综合框架(CFIR)对焦点小组数据进行了演绎编码:调查问卷显示,在登记表(91.7%)、症状报告(95.5%)和 COVID-19 测试(95.7%)方面存在的问题极少。大多数受访者(95.1%)表示愿意再次参加 ABTPP。访谈揭示了与参与者体验相关的三个主题:计划效率、信息清晰度和必要的努力。焦点小组确定了主要的实施促进因素,包括单一的医疗信息系统、利益相关者的牢固合作关系以及合作关系之间的良好沟通。障碍包括计划的复杂性、实施时间表和不断变化的外部环境:与会者对 ABTPP 的满意度很高。边境检测项目应具有高效率、低投入,并使用清晰一致的信息。强有力的领导、适应性、自动化组件、良好的沟通和简单的技术可促进边境测试计划的有效实施。从参与者和工作人员那里获得的经验可能有助于改进边境控制计划的实施,以应对未来的大流行病或其他紧急情况:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,ABTTP 是一项新颖的边境控制措施。我们对参与者和工作人员的体验进行了评估,结果显示旅客的满意度很高,同时也发现了需要改进的地方,这些都可以为未来边境控制措施的制定提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1