Analysis of a telephone hotline for palliative care patients at home and their families.

Maria de Lurdes da Costa Martins, Sara Pinto
{"title":"Analysis of a telephone hotline for palliative care patients at home and their families.","authors":"Maria de Lurdes da Costa Martins, Sara Pinto","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.12.571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To describe the use of a telephone consultation (TC) hotline for palliative care (PC) patients and their families at home provided by a PC service, during the COVID-19 lockdown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational and cross-sectional study of a TC hotline performed by a PC service from 1 January to 31 December 2020. Data was collected through a record sheet completed during the call. Descriptive analyses were performed using the SPSS software (V.21 for Windows).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 494 calls were retrieved (n=187 patients; 6500 minutes recorded). Compared to 2019, incoming calls increased 33.8%. Most callers were a family member (n=419) or a community health worker (n= 60). The peak of calls was registered in April (13.5%), May (13.2%) and October (15.0%). Main problems included uncontrolled symptoms (81.9%), need for medication (8.6%), information (4.8%) and consultation rescheduling (2.6%). In 81.9% of the cases, the call occurred during a crisis. The PC team solved 92.9% of the problems. Only 20 patients were admitted in the emergency department (this was 30.5% less compared to 2019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TC is a feasible alternative to traditional in-person follow-ups. Callers considered it very useful, especially during the COVID-19 lockdown. Communication was improved and admissions to emergency services were reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"29 12","pages":"571-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2023.29.12.571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To describe the use of a telephone consultation (TC) hotline for palliative care (PC) patients and their families at home provided by a PC service, during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Methods: Observational and cross-sectional study of a TC hotline performed by a PC service from 1 January to 31 December 2020. Data was collected through a record sheet completed during the call. Descriptive analyses were performed using the SPSS software (V.21 for Windows).

Results: A total of 494 calls were retrieved (n=187 patients; 6500 minutes recorded). Compared to 2019, incoming calls increased 33.8%. Most callers were a family member (n=419) or a community health worker (n= 60). The peak of calls was registered in April (13.5%), May (13.2%) and October (15.0%). Main problems included uncontrolled symptoms (81.9%), need for medication (8.6%), information (4.8%) and consultation rescheduling (2.6%). In 81.9% of the cases, the call occurred during a crisis. The PC team solved 92.9% of the problems. Only 20 patients were admitted in the emergency department (this was 30.5% less compared to 2019).

Conclusions: The TC is a feasible alternative to traditional in-person follow-ups. Callers considered it very useful, especially during the COVID-19 lockdown. Communication was improved and admissions to emergency services were reduced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对居家姑息关怀患者及其家属的电话热线分析。
背景:描述在 COVID-19 封锁期间,由姑息关怀(PC)服务机构为居家姑息关怀(PC)患者及其家属提供的电话咨询热线的使用情况:描述在COVID-19封锁期间,由姑息关怀(PC)服务机构为居家姑息关怀(PC)患者及其家属提供的电话咨询热线(TC)的使用情况:观察性横断面研究:2020 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间由 PC 服务机构提供的电话咨询热线。数据通过通话过程中填写的记录表收集。使用 SPSS 软件(V.21 for Windows)进行描述性分析:共检索到 494 个呼叫(n=187 名患者;记录时间 6500 分钟)。与 2019 年相比,来电增加了 33.8%。大多数来电者是家庭成员(人数=419)或社区卫生工作者(人数=60)。来电高峰出现在四月(13.5%)、五月(13.2%)和十月(15.0%)。主要问题包括症状未得到控制(81.9%)、需要药物(8.6%)、信息(4.8%)和重新安排就诊时间(2.6%)。在 81.9% 的病例中,电话都是在危机时刻打来的。PC 团队解决了 92.9% 的问题。急诊科仅收治了 20 名患者(与 2019 年相比减少了 30.5%):TC 是传统面对面随访的可行替代方案。来电者认为它非常有用,尤其是在 COVID-19 封锁期间。沟通得到了改善,急诊入院人数也有所减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disclosure of diagnosis and prognosis of end-stage renal disease: perspectives of nurses. Difficulties and challenges encountered by trained medical workers when delivering palliative care to patients with cancer: a qualitative study. A mixed-methods systematic review of interventions for parents during and after neonatal end of life in the neonatal intensive care unit. Dementia. The role of spirituality among nursing home staff caring for residents with advanced dementia: a qualitative descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1