Michael Abouyannis, Hanif Esmail, Mainga Hamaluba, Mwanajuma Ngama, Hope Mwangudzah, Noni Mumba, Betty K Yeri, Salim Mwalukore, Hassan J Alphan, Dinesh Aggarwal, Gabriel Alcoba, Nick Cammack, Jean-Philippe Chippaux, Matthew E Coldiron, José M Gutiérrez, Abdulrazaq G Habib, Robert A Harrison, Geoffrey K Isbister, Eric J Lavonas, Diogo Martins, Isabela Ribeiro, James A Watson, David J Williams, Nicholas R Casewell, Sarah A Walker, David G Lalloo
{"title":"[A global core outcome measurement set for snakebite clinical trials].","authors":"Michael Abouyannis, Hanif Esmail, Mainga Hamaluba, Mwanajuma Ngama, Hope Mwangudzah, Noni Mumba, Betty K Yeri, Salim Mwalukore, Hassan J Alphan, Dinesh Aggarwal, Gabriel Alcoba, Nick Cammack, Jean-Philippe Chippaux, Matthew E Coldiron, José M Gutiérrez, Abdulrazaq G Habib, Robert A Harrison, Geoffrey K Isbister, Eric J Lavonas, Diogo Martins, Isabela Ribeiro, James A Watson, David J Williams, Nicholas R Casewell, Sarah A Walker, David G Lalloo","doi":"10.48327/mtsi.v3i3.2023.421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Snakebite clinical trials have often used heterogeneous outcome measures and there is an urgent need for standardisation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A globally representative group of key stakeholders came together to reach consensus on a globally relevant set of core outcome measurements. Outcome domains and outcome measurement instruments were identified through searching the literature and a systematic review of snakebite clinical trials. Outcome domains were shortlisted by use of a questionnaire and consensus was reached among stakeholders and the patient group through facilitated discussions and voting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five universal core outcome measures should be included in all future snakebite clinical trials: mortality, WHO disability assessment scale, patient-specific functional scale, acute allergic reaction by Brown criteria, and serum sickness by formal criteria. Additional syndrome-specific core outcome measures should be used depending on the biting species.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This core outcome measurement set provides global standardisation, supports the priorities of patients and clinicians, enables meta-analysis, and is appropriate for use in low-income and middle-income settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":101416,"journal":{"name":"Medecine tropicale et sante internationale","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine tropicale et sante internationale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48327/mtsi.v3i3.2023.421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Snakebite clinical trials have often used heterogeneous outcome measures and there is an urgent need for standardisation.
Method: A globally representative group of key stakeholders came together to reach consensus on a globally relevant set of core outcome measurements. Outcome domains and outcome measurement instruments were identified through searching the literature and a systematic review of snakebite clinical trials. Outcome domains were shortlisted by use of a questionnaire and consensus was reached among stakeholders and the patient group through facilitated discussions and voting.
Results: Five universal core outcome measures should be included in all future snakebite clinical trials: mortality, WHO disability assessment scale, patient-specific functional scale, acute allergic reaction by Brown criteria, and serum sickness by formal criteria. Additional syndrome-specific core outcome measures should be used depending on the biting species.
Conclusion: This core outcome measurement set provides global standardisation, supports the priorities of patients and clinicians, enables meta-analysis, and is appropriate for use in low-income and middle-income settings.