Generative AI and composing: an intergenerational conversation among literacy scholars

Grace Enriquez, Victoria Gill, Gerald Campano, Tracey T. Flores, Stephanie Jones, Kevin M. Leander, Lucinda McKnight, Detra Price-Dennis
{"title":"Generative AI and composing: an intergenerational conversation among literacy scholars","authors":"Grace Enriquez, Victoria Gill, Gerald Campano, Tracey T. Flores, Stephanie Jones, Kevin M. Leander, Lucinda McKnight, Detra Price-Dennis","doi":"10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this paper is to provide a transcript of a dialogue among literacy educators and researchers on the impact of generative aritficial intelligence (AI) in the field. In the spring of 2023, a lively conversation emerged on the National Council of Research on Language and Literacy (NCRLL)’s listserv. Stephanie initiated the conversation by sharing an op-ed she wrote for <em>Atlanta Journal-Constitution</em> about the rise of ChatGPT and similar generative AI platforms, moving beyond the general public’s concerns about student cheating and robot takeovers. NCRLL then convened a webinar of eight leading scholars in writing and literacies development, inspired by that listerv conversation and an organizational interest in promoting intergenerational collaboration among literacy scholars.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>As former doctoral students of two of the panel participants, webinar facilitators Grace and Victoria positioned themselves primarily as learners about this topic and gathered questions from colleagues, P-16 practitioners and those outside the field of education to assess the concerns and wonderings that ChatGPT and generative AI have raised. The following webinar conversation was recorded on two different days due to scheduling conflicts. It has been merged and edited into one dialogue for coherence and convergence.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Panel participants raise a host of questions and issues that go beyond topics of ethics, morality and basic writing instruction. Furthermore, in dialogue with one another, they describe possibilities for meaningful pedagogy and critical literacy to ensure that generative AI is used for a socially just future for students. While the discussion addressed matters of pedagogy, definitions of literacy and the purpose of (literacy) education, other themes included a critique of capitalism; an interrogation of the systems of power and oppression involved in using generative AI; and the philosophical, ontological, ethical and practical life questions about being human.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper provides a glimpse into one of the first panel conversations about ChatGPT and generative AI in the field of literacy. Not only are the panel members respected scholars in the field, they are also former doctoral students and advisors of one another, thus positioning all involved as both learners and teachers of this new technology.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":501133,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a transcript of a dialogue among literacy educators and researchers on the impact of generative aritficial intelligence (AI) in the field. In the spring of 2023, a lively conversation emerged on the National Council of Research on Language and Literacy (NCRLL)’s listserv. Stephanie initiated the conversation by sharing an op-ed she wrote for Atlanta Journal-Constitution about the rise of ChatGPT and similar generative AI platforms, moving beyond the general public’s concerns about student cheating and robot takeovers. NCRLL then convened a webinar of eight leading scholars in writing and literacies development, inspired by that listerv conversation and an organizational interest in promoting intergenerational collaboration among literacy scholars.

Design/methodology/approach

As former doctoral students of two of the panel participants, webinar facilitators Grace and Victoria positioned themselves primarily as learners about this topic and gathered questions from colleagues, P-16 practitioners and those outside the field of education to assess the concerns and wonderings that ChatGPT and generative AI have raised. The following webinar conversation was recorded on two different days due to scheduling conflicts. It has been merged and edited into one dialogue for coherence and convergence.

Findings

Panel participants raise a host of questions and issues that go beyond topics of ethics, morality and basic writing instruction. Furthermore, in dialogue with one another, they describe possibilities for meaningful pedagogy and critical literacy to ensure that generative AI is used for a socially just future for students. While the discussion addressed matters of pedagogy, definitions of literacy and the purpose of (literacy) education, other themes included a critique of capitalism; an interrogation of the systems of power and oppression involved in using generative AI; and the philosophical, ontological, ethical and practical life questions about being human.

Originality/value

This paper provides a glimpse into one of the first panel conversations about ChatGPT and generative AI in the field of literacy. Not only are the panel members respected scholars in the field, they are also former doctoral students and advisors of one another, thus positioning all involved as both learners and teachers of this new technology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成式人工智能与作曲:扫盲学者之间的跨代对话
本文旨在提供扫盲教育工作者和研究人员之间关于生成式人工智能(AI)在该领域的影响的对话实录。2023 年春天,全国语言与读写能力研究委员会(NCRLL)的邮件列表服务上出现了一场热烈的对话。斯蒂芬妮通过分享她为《亚特兰大日报-stitution》撰写的一篇专栏文章发起了这场对话,文章谈到了 ChatGPT 和类似的生成式人工智能平台的崛起,超越了公众对学生作弊和机器人接管的担忧。随后,NCRLL 召集了八位写作和读写能力发展领域的顶尖学者举行了一次网络研讨会,这次研讨会是受该列表交流以及促进读写能力学者间跨代合作的组织兴趣的启发而召开的。作为小组中两位参与者的前博士生,网络研讨会主持人格蕾丝和维多利亚将自己主要定位为这一主题的学习者,并收集了来自同事、P-16 从业者和教育领域外人士的问题,以评估 ChatGPT 和生成式人工智能所引发的担忧和疑惑。由于时间安排上的冲突,以下网络研讨会对话是在两个不同的日子录制的。讨论结果小组成员提出了许多问题,这些问题超出了伦理、道德和基础写作教学的范畴。此外,在相互对话中,他们描述了有意义的教学法和批判性素养的可能性,以确保生成式人工智能被用于为学生创造一个社会公正的未来。讨论涉及了教学法、扫盲定义和(扫盲)教育的目的等问题,其他主题还包括对资本主义的批判;对使用人工智能生成器所涉及的权力和压迫系统的质疑;以及关于人类的哲学、本体论、伦理和实际生活问题。小组成员不仅是该领域德高望重的学者,他们还是彼此的前博士生和导师,因此,所有参与者既是这项新技术的学习者,也是这项新技术的教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adopting a languaging approach for teaching about the climate crisis in English language arts Form, criticality, and humanity: topic modeling the field of literary studies for English education I apologize: body positivity love movements “We're loud, why aren't you?” Laura’s social media activism through justice-oriented literacies Loving the skin, you’re in: a deconstruction of children’s literature that focus on body (size) issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1