Evaluating the impact of cross-institutional teaching enhancement collaborations using a professional capital framework

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Professional Capital and Community Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1108/jpcc-03-2023-0021
Tracy X.P. Zou, Dai Hounsell, Quentin A. Parker, Ben Y.B. Chan
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of cross-institutional teaching enhancement collaborations using a professional capital framework","authors":"Tracy X.P. Zou, Dai Hounsell, Quentin A. Parker, Ben Y.B. Chan","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-03-2023-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of four cross-institutional teaching enhancement projects (TEPs), a relatively new form of professional collaboration. The focus is on the impact at departmental, institutional and cross-institutional levels because such impact is the main reason for establishing cross-institutional TEPs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A professional capital framework guided the examination of decisional and social capitals at departmental, institutional and cross-institutional levels. A theory-of-change method was adopted to collect data from 35 sets of documents, 22 project members and 65 stakeholders.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors found five forms of impact, showing the development of decisional and social capitals mostly at institutional and cross-institutional levels, whilst signaling the relatively weak impact at departmental levels. Therefore, the values of cross-institutional TEPs have not been fully realized and future endeavors need to better utilize the capitals in programs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Few studies evaluated the impact of large-scale, cross-institutional TEPs. The authors offered new contributions by gauging the impact of these under-explored forms of complex professional collaborations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-03-2023-0021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of four cross-institutional teaching enhancement projects (TEPs), a relatively new form of professional collaboration. The focus is on the impact at departmental, institutional and cross-institutional levels because such impact is the main reason for establishing cross-institutional TEPs.

Design/methodology/approach

A professional capital framework guided the examination of decisional and social capitals at departmental, institutional and cross-institutional levels. A theory-of-change method was adopted to collect data from 35 sets of documents, 22 project members and 65 stakeholders.

Findings

The authors found five forms of impact, showing the development of decisional and social capitals mostly at institutional and cross-institutional levels, whilst signaling the relatively weak impact at departmental levels. Therefore, the values of cross-institutional TEPs have not been fully realized and future endeavors need to better utilize the capitals in programs.

Originality/value

Few studies evaluated the impact of large-scale, cross-institutional TEPs. The authors offered new contributions by gauging the impact of these under-explored forms of complex professional collaborations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用专业资本框架评估跨机构教学促进合作的影响
目的 本研究旨在评估四个跨院校教学改进项目(TEPs)的影响,这是一种相对较新的专业合作形式。研究重点是部门、院校和跨院校层面的影响,因为这种影响是建立跨院校教学改进项目的主要原因。设计/方法/途径 在专业资本框架的指导下,对部门、院校和跨院校层面的决策和社会资本进行了研究。作者发现了五种影响形式,表明决策和社会资本的发展主要集中在机构和跨机构层面,而部门层面的影响相对较弱。因此,跨机构技术教育项目的价值尚未完全实现,未来的工作需要更好地利用项目中的资本。 原创性/价值很少有研究对大规模、跨机构技术教育项目的影响进行评估。作者通过衡量这些未被充分探索的复杂专业合作形式的影响,做出了新的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
A call to adopt pedagogies of optimism in times of armed conflicts: theoretical and practical insights Learning with and from each other: creating safe spaces in a professional community for school leadership development How teachers enhance ICT integration practices within professional learning communities: a qualitative study in Tanzania The unbearable lightness of being implicated in conflict-affected societies: can teachers do anything about it? Educational leadership during a time of war in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1