Sample selection method using near-infrared spectral information entropy as similarity criterion for constructing and updating peach firmness and soluble solids content prediction models

IF 2.3 4区 化学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Journal of Chemometrics Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1002/cem.3528
Yande Liu, Cong He, Xiaogang Jiang
{"title":"Sample selection method using near-infrared spectral information entropy as similarity criterion for constructing and updating peach firmness and soluble solids content prediction models","authors":"Yande Liu,&nbsp;Cong He,&nbsp;Xiaogang Jiang","doi":"10.1002/cem.3528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When using near-infrared (NIR) techniques for analysis, model construction and maintenance updates are essential. When model construction is performed in machine learning, the sample set is usually divided into the calibration set and the validation set. The representativeness of the calibration set and the reasonable distribution of the validation set affects the accuracy of the established model. In addition, when maintaining and updating models, selecting the most informative updated sample not only improves the model prediction accuracy but also reduces sample preparation. In this paper, the spectral information entropy (SIE) is proposed to be used as a similarity criterion for dividing the sample set and use this criterion to select updated samples. The Kennard–Stone (KS) and the sample set portioning based on joint <i>x</i>–<i>y</i> distance (SPXY) methods were used for comparison to verify the superiority of the proposed method. The results showed that the model built after dividing the sample set using the SIE method has good prediction effect compared with KS and SPXY method. When predicting soluble solid content (SSC) and hardness, the prediction determination coefficient (\n<math>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msubsup></math>) was improved by more than 15%, and the root mean square error (RMSE) of prediction was reduced by 50%. In terms of model updating, selecting a small number of updated samples using the SIE method can improve the correlation coefficient (\n<math>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mi>R</mi>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mrow></mrow>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow></math>) to more than 80%, and updated models' prediction accuracy is higher than that of KS and SPXY method. It is confirmed that the SIE method can make the NIR analysis technique more reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":15274,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemometrics","volume":"38 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemometrics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cem.3528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When using near-infrared (NIR) techniques for analysis, model construction and maintenance updates are essential. When model construction is performed in machine learning, the sample set is usually divided into the calibration set and the validation set. The representativeness of the calibration set and the reasonable distribution of the validation set affects the accuracy of the established model. In addition, when maintaining and updating models, selecting the most informative updated sample not only improves the model prediction accuracy but also reduces sample preparation. In this paper, the spectral information entropy (SIE) is proposed to be used as a similarity criterion for dividing the sample set and use this criterion to select updated samples. The Kennard–Stone (KS) and the sample set portioning based on joint xy distance (SPXY) methods were used for comparison to verify the superiority of the proposed method. The results showed that the model built after dividing the sample set using the SIE method has good prediction effect compared with KS and SPXY method. When predicting soluble solid content (SSC) and hardness, the prediction determination coefficient ( R P 2 ) was improved by more than 15%, and the root mean square error (RMSE) of prediction was reduced by 50%. In terms of model updating, selecting a small number of updated samples using the SIE method can improve the correlation coefficient ( R P ) to more than 80%, and updated models' prediction accuracy is higher than that of KS and SPXY method. It is confirmed that the SIE method can make the NIR analysis technique more reliable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用近红外光谱信息熵作为相似性标准的样本选择方法,用于构建和更新桃子硬度和可溶性固形物含量预测模型
使用近红外(NIR)技术进行分析时,模型构建和维护更新至关重要。在机器学习中构建模型时,样本集通常分为校准集和验证集。校准集的代表性和验证集的合理分布会影响所建模型的准确性。此外,在维护和更新模型时,选择信息量最大的更新样本不仅能提高模型预测精度,还能减少样本准备工作。本文提出将光谱信息熵(SIE)作为划分样本集的相似性准则,并利用该准则选择更新样本。比较了 Kennard-Stone (KS) 方法和基于联合 x-y 距离 (SPXY) 的样本集划分方法,以验证所提方法的优越性。结果表明,与 KS 和 SPXY 方法相比,使用 SIE 方法分割样品集后建立的模型具有良好的预测效果。在预测可溶性固形物含量(SSC)和硬度时,预测判定系数(RP2$$ {R}_P^2 $$)提高了 15%以上,预测均方根误差(RMSE)降低了 50%。在模型更新方面,利用 SIE 方法选择少量更新样本可以将相关系数(RP$$ {R}_P $$)提高到 80% 以上,更新后模型的预测精度高于 KS 和 SPXY 方法。因此,SIE 方法可以使近红外分析技术更加可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemometrics
Journal of Chemometrics 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemometrics is devoted to the rapid publication of original scientific papers, reviews and short communications on fundamental and applied aspects of chemometrics. It also provides a forum for the exchange of information on meetings and other news relevant to the growing community of scientists who are interested in chemometrics and its applications. Short, critical review papers are a particularly important feature of the journal, in view of the multidisciplinary readership at which it is aimed.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover Image Past, Present and Future of Research in Analytical Figures of Merit Analytical Figures of Merit in Univariate, Multivariate, and Multiway Calibration: What Have We Learned? What Do We Still Need to Learn? Paul Geladi (1951–2024) Chemometrician, spectroscopist and pioneer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1