Sarah R Vreijling, Cherise R Chin Fatt, Leanne M Williams, Alan F Schatzberg, Tim Usherwood, Charles B Nemeroff, A John Rush, Rudolf Uher, Katherine J Aitchison, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Marcella Rietschel, Madhukar H Trivedi, Manish K Jha, Brenda W J H Penninx, Aartjan T F Beekman, Rick Jansen, Femke Lamers
{"title":"Features of immunometabolic depression as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcomes: pooled analysis of four clinical trials.","authors":"Sarah R Vreijling, Cherise R Chin Fatt, Leanne M Williams, Alan F Schatzberg, Tim Usherwood, Charles B Nemeroff, A John Rush, Rudolf Uher, Katherine J Aitchison, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Marcella Rietschel, Madhukar H Trivedi, Manish K Jha, Brenda W J H Penninx, Aartjan T F Beekman, Rick Jansen, Femke Lamers","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2023.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Profiling patients on a proposed 'immunometabolic depression' (IMD) dimension, described as a cluster of atypical depressive symptoms related to energy regulation and immunometabolic dysregulations, may optimise personalised treatment.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test the hypothesis that baseline IMD features predict poorer treatment outcomes with antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data on 2551 individuals with depression across the iSPOT-D (<i>n</i> = 967), CO-MED (<i>n</i> = 665), GENDEP (<i>n</i> = 773) and EMBARC (<i>n</i> = 146) clinical trials were used. Predictors included baseline severity of atypical energy-related symptoms (AES), body mass index (BMI) and C-reactive protein levels (CRP, three trials only) separately and aggregated into an IMD index. Mixed models on the primary outcome (change in depressive symptom severity) and logistic regressions on secondary outcomes (response and remission) were conducted for the individual trial data-sets and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although AES severity and BMI did not predict changes in depressive symptom severity, higher baseline CRP predicted smaller reductions in depressive symptoms (<i>n</i> = 376, β<sub>pooled</sub> = 0.06, <i>P =</i> 0.049, 95% CI 0.0001-0.12, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 3.61%); this was also found for an IMD index combining these features (<i>n</i> = 372, β<sub>pooled</sub> = 0.12, s.e. = 0.12, <i>P =</i> 0.031, 95% CI 0.01-0.22, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup><i>=</i> 23.91%), with a higher - but still small - effect size compared with CRP. Confining analyses to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users indicated larger effects of CRP (β<sub>pooled</sub> = 0.16) and the IMD index (β<sub>pooled</sub> = 0.20). Baseline IMD features, both separately and combined, did not predict response or remission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depressive symptoms of people with more IMD features improved less when treated with antidepressants. However, clinical relevance is limited owing to small effect sizes in inconsistent associations. Whether these patients would benefit more from treatments targeting immunometabolic pathways remains to be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10884825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2023.148","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Profiling patients on a proposed 'immunometabolic depression' (IMD) dimension, described as a cluster of atypical depressive symptoms related to energy regulation and immunometabolic dysregulations, may optimise personalised treatment.
Aims: To test the hypothesis that baseline IMD features predict poorer treatment outcomes with antidepressants.
Method: Data on 2551 individuals with depression across the iSPOT-D (n = 967), CO-MED (n = 665), GENDEP (n = 773) and EMBARC (n = 146) clinical trials were used. Predictors included baseline severity of atypical energy-related symptoms (AES), body mass index (BMI) and C-reactive protein levels (CRP, three trials only) separately and aggregated into an IMD index. Mixed models on the primary outcome (change in depressive symptom severity) and logistic regressions on secondary outcomes (response and remission) were conducted for the individual trial data-sets and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.
Results: Although AES severity and BMI did not predict changes in depressive symptom severity, higher baseline CRP predicted smaller reductions in depressive symptoms (n = 376, βpooled = 0.06, P = 0.049, 95% CI 0.0001-0.12, I2 = 3.61%); this was also found for an IMD index combining these features (n = 372, βpooled = 0.12, s.e. = 0.12, P = 0.031, 95% CI 0.01-0.22, I2= 23.91%), with a higher - but still small - effect size compared with CRP. Confining analyses to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users indicated larger effects of CRP (βpooled = 0.16) and the IMD index (βpooled = 0.20). Baseline IMD features, both separately and combined, did not predict response or remission.
Conclusions: Depressive symptoms of people with more IMD features improved less when treated with antidepressants. However, clinical relevance is limited owing to small effect sizes in inconsistent associations. Whether these patients would benefit more from treatments targeting immunometabolic pathways remains to be investigated.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.