Features of immunometabolic depression as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcomes: pooled analysis of four clinical trials.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY British Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1192/bjp.2023.148
Sarah R Vreijling, Cherise R Chin Fatt, Leanne M Williams, Alan F Schatzberg, Tim Usherwood, Charles B Nemeroff, A John Rush, Rudolf Uher, Katherine J Aitchison, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Marcella Rietschel, Madhukar H Trivedi, Manish K Jha, Brenda W J H Penninx, Aartjan T F Beekman, Rick Jansen, Femke Lamers
{"title":"Features of immunometabolic depression as predictors of antidepressant treatment outcomes: pooled analysis of four clinical trials.","authors":"Sarah R Vreijling, Cherise R Chin Fatt, Leanne M Williams, Alan F Schatzberg, Tim Usherwood, Charles B Nemeroff, A John Rush, Rudolf Uher, Katherine J Aitchison, Ole Köhler-Forsberg, Marcella Rietschel, Madhukar H Trivedi, Manish K Jha, Brenda W J H Penninx, Aartjan T F Beekman, Rick Jansen, Femke Lamers","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2023.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Profiling patients on a proposed 'immunometabolic depression' (IMD) dimension, described as a cluster of atypical depressive symptoms related to energy regulation and immunometabolic dysregulations, may optimise personalised treatment.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To test the hypothesis that baseline IMD features predict poorer treatment outcomes with antidepressants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data on 2551 individuals with depression across the iSPOT-D (<i>n</i> = 967), CO-MED (<i>n</i> = 665), GENDEP (<i>n</i> = 773) and EMBARC (<i>n</i> = 146) clinical trials were used. Predictors included baseline severity of atypical energy-related symptoms (AES), body mass index (BMI) and C-reactive protein levels (CRP, three trials only) separately and aggregated into an IMD index. Mixed models on the primary outcome (change in depressive symptom severity) and logistic regressions on secondary outcomes (response and remission) were conducted for the individual trial data-sets and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although AES severity and BMI did not predict changes in depressive symptom severity, higher baseline CRP predicted smaller reductions in depressive symptoms (<i>n</i> = 376, β<sub>pooled</sub> = 0.06, <i>P =</i> 0.049, 95% CI 0.0001-0.12, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 3.61%); this was also found for an IMD index combining these features (<i>n</i> = 372, β<sub>pooled</sub> = 0.12, s.e. = 0.12, <i>P =</i> 0.031, 95% CI 0.01-0.22, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup><i>=</i> 23.91%), with a higher - but still small - effect size compared with CRP. Confining analyses to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users indicated larger effects of CRP (β<sub>pooled</sub> = 0.16) and the IMD index (β<sub>pooled</sub> = 0.20). Baseline IMD features, both separately and combined, did not predict response or remission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depressive symptoms of people with more IMD features improved less when treated with antidepressants. However, clinical relevance is limited owing to small effect sizes in inconsistent associations. Whether these patients would benefit more from treatments targeting immunometabolic pathways remains to be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":9259,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10884825/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2023.148","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Profiling patients on a proposed 'immunometabolic depression' (IMD) dimension, described as a cluster of atypical depressive symptoms related to energy regulation and immunometabolic dysregulations, may optimise personalised treatment.

Aims: To test the hypothesis that baseline IMD features predict poorer treatment outcomes with antidepressants.

Method: Data on 2551 individuals with depression across the iSPOT-D (n = 967), CO-MED (n = 665), GENDEP (n = 773) and EMBARC (n = 146) clinical trials were used. Predictors included baseline severity of atypical energy-related symptoms (AES), body mass index (BMI) and C-reactive protein levels (CRP, three trials only) separately and aggregated into an IMD index. Mixed models on the primary outcome (change in depressive symptom severity) and logistic regressions on secondary outcomes (response and remission) were conducted for the individual trial data-sets and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.

Results: Although AES severity and BMI did not predict changes in depressive symptom severity, higher baseline CRP predicted smaller reductions in depressive symptoms (n = 376, βpooled = 0.06, P = 0.049, 95% CI 0.0001-0.12, I2 = 3.61%); this was also found for an IMD index combining these features (n = 372, βpooled = 0.12, s.e. = 0.12, P = 0.031, 95% CI 0.01-0.22, I2= 23.91%), with a higher - but still small - effect size compared with CRP. Confining analyses to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor users indicated larger effects of CRP (βpooled = 0.16) and the IMD index (βpooled = 0.20). Baseline IMD features, both separately and combined, did not predict response or remission.

Conclusions: Depressive symptoms of people with more IMD features improved less when treated with antidepressants. However, clinical relevance is limited owing to small effect sizes in inconsistent associations. Whether these patients would benefit more from treatments targeting immunometabolic pathways remains to be investigated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为抗抑郁治疗结果预测因素的免疫代谢性抑郁症特征:四项临床试验的汇总分析。
背景:根据提出的 "免疫代谢性抑郁症"(IMD)维度对患者进行分析,该维度被描述为一组与能量调节和免疫代谢失调有关的非典型抑郁症状,可优化个性化治疗:方法:使用 iSPOT-D(967 人)、CO-MED(665 人)、GENDEP(773 人)和 EMBARC(146 人)临床试验中 2551 名抑郁症患者的数据。预测因素包括非典型能量相关症状(AES)的基线严重程度、体重指数(BMI)和C反应蛋白水平(CRP,仅三项试验),分别汇总为IMD指数。对单个试验数据集进行了主要结果(抑郁症状严重程度的变化)混合模型和次要结果(反应和缓解)逻辑回归,并使用随机效应荟萃分析进行了汇总:虽然 AES 严重程度和体重指数不能预测抑郁症状严重程度的变化,但较高的基线 CRP 预测抑郁症状的减轻程度较小(n = 376,βpooled = 0.06,P = 0.049,95% CI 0.0001-0.12,I2 = 3.61%);结合这些特征的 IMD 指数也是如此(n = 372,βpooled = 0.12,s.e. = 0.12,P = 0.031,95% CI 0.01-0.22,I2= 23.91%),与 CRP 相比,效应大小更高,但仍然很小。对选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂使用者的分析表明,CRP(βpooled = 0.16)和IMD指数(βpooled = 0.20)的影响更大。IMD指数的基线特征,无论是单独还是合并,都不能预测反应或缓解:结论:在使用抗抑郁药物治疗时,IMD特征较多的患者抑郁症状改善较少。结论:IMD特征较多的患者在接受抗抑郁药物治疗后,抑郁症状改善较少,但由于相关性不一致且效应较小,因此临床意义有限。这些患者是否会从针对免疫代谢途径的治疗中获益更多,还有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Psychiatry
British Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychiatry (BJPsych) is a renowned international journal that undergoes rigorous peer review. It covers various branches of psychiatry, with a specific focus on the clinical aspects of each topic. Published monthly by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, this journal is dedicated to enhancing the prevention, investigation, diagnosis, treatment, and care of mental illness worldwide. It also strives to promote global mental health. In addition to featuring authoritative original research articles from across the globe, the journal includes editorials, review articles, commentaries on contentious issues, a comprehensive book review section, and a dynamic correspondence column. BJPsych is an essential source of information for psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and other professionals interested in mental health.
期刊最新文献
Detection of suicidality from medical text using privacy-preserving large language models. Breast cancer risk among women with schizophrenia and association with duration of antipsychotic use: population-based cohort study in South Korea. Equal, equitable or exacerbating inequalities: patterns and predictors of social prescribing referrals in 160 128 UK patients. Apotychiaphobia: should there be a term for fear of miscarriage? Association between dietary fat intake and the risk of Alzheimer's disease: Mendelian randomisation study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1