Dutch GP healthcare consumption in COVID-19 heterogeneous regions: an interregional time-series approach in 2020-2021.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0121
Maarten Homburg, Marjolein Berger, Matthijs Berends, Eline Meijer, Thijmen Kupers, Lotte Ramerman, Corinne Rijpkema, Evelien de Schepper, Tim Olde Hartman, Jean Muris, Robert Verheij, Lilian Peters
{"title":"Dutch GP healthcare consumption in COVID-19 heterogeneous regions: an interregional time-series approach in 2020-2021.","authors":"Maarten Homburg, Marjolein Berger, Matthijs Berends, Eline Meijer, Thijmen Kupers, Lotte Ramerman, Corinne Rijpkema, Evelien de Schepper, Tim Olde Hartman, Jean Muris, Robert Verheij, Lilian Peters","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many countries observed a sharp decline in the use of general practice services after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, research has not yet considered how changes in healthcare consumption varied among regions with the same restrictive measures but different COVID-19 prevalence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected healthcare consumption in Dutch general practice during 2020 and 2021, among regions with known heterogeneity in COVID-19 prevalence, from a pre-pandemic baseline in 2019.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Population-based cohort study using electronic health records. The study was undertaken in Dutch general practices involved in regional research networks.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An interrupted time-series analysis of changes in healthcare consumption from before to during the pandemic was performed. Descriptive statistics were used on the number of potential COVID-19-related contacts, reason for contact, and type of contact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study covered 3 595 802 contacts (425 639 patients), 3 506 637 contacts (433 340 patients), and 4 105 413 contacts (434 872 patients) in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Time-series analysis revealed a significant decrease in healthcare consumption after the outbreak of the pandemic. Despite interregional heterogeneity in COVID-19 prevalence, healthcare consumption decreased comparably over time in the three regions, before rebounding to a level significantly higher than baseline in 2021. Physical consultations transitioned to phone or digital over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare consumption decreased irrespective of the regional prevalence of COVID-19 from the start of the pandemic, with the Delta variant triggering a further decrease. Overall, changes in care consumption appeared to reflect contextual factors and societal restrictions rather than infection rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many countries observed a sharp decline in the use of general practice services after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, research has not yet considered how changes in healthcare consumption varied among regions with the same restrictive measures but different COVID-19 prevalence.

Aim: To investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected healthcare consumption in Dutch general practice during 2020 and 2021, among regions with known heterogeneity in COVID-19 prevalence, from a pre-pandemic baseline in 2019.

Design & setting: Population-based cohort study using electronic health records. The study was undertaken in Dutch general practices involved in regional research networks.

Method: An interrupted time-series analysis of changes in healthcare consumption from before to during the pandemic was performed. Descriptive statistics were used on the number of potential COVID-19-related contacts, reason for contact, and type of contact.

Results: The study covered 3 595 802 contacts (425 639 patients), 3 506 637 contacts (433 340 patients), and 4 105 413 contacts (434 872 patients) in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Time-series analysis revealed a significant decrease in healthcare consumption after the outbreak of the pandemic. Despite interregional heterogeneity in COVID-19 prevalence, healthcare consumption decreased comparably over time in the three regions, before rebounding to a level significantly higher than baseline in 2021. Physical consultations transitioned to phone or digital over time.

Conclusion: Healthcare consumption decreased irrespective of the regional prevalence of COVID-19 from the start of the pandemic, with the Delta variant triggering a further decrease. Overall, changes in care consumption appeared to reflect contextual factors and societal restrictions rather than infection rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 异构地区的荷兰 GP 医疗消费:2020-2021 年地区间时间序列方法。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行爆发后,许多国家发现全科医疗服务的使用率急剧下降。目的:调查 COVID-19 大流行如何影响 2020 年和 2021 年荷兰全科医疗服务的医疗消费:设计:基于人群的队列研究,使用电子健康记录:方法:间断时间序列分析:方法: 对大流行前到大流行期间的医疗消费变化进行间断时间序列分析。对与 COVID-19 相关的潜在接触者人数、接触原因和接触类型进行描述性统计:研究分别涵盖了 2019 年、2020 年和 2021 年的 3 627 597 名接触者(425 639 名患者)、3 532 693 名接触者(433 340 名患者)和 4 134 636 名接触者(434 872 名患者)。时间序列分析显示,大流行爆发后,医疗保健消费大幅下降。尽管地区间 COVID-19 感染率存在差异,但三个地区的医疗消费随时间的推移下降幅度相当,2021 年反弹至明显高于基线的水平。随着时间的推移,物理咨询过渡到了电话或数字咨询:结论:从大流行开始,无论COVID-19在哪个地区流行,医疗消费都会下降,而Delta变异体会导致医疗消费进一步下降。总体而言,医疗消费的变化似乎反映了环境因素和社会限制,而不是感染率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Primary care performance in a Ugandan rural district: cross-sectional descriptive study. Mental healthcare and pragmatic shared decision-making in general practice: An interview study. Treating the perimenopause in the UK armed forces: a mixed methods review exploring the confidence of general practitioners. Translating primary care to telehealth: analysis of in-person paediatric consultations and role of the carers. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1