Dutch GP healthcare consumption in COVID-19 heterogeneous regions: an interregional time-series approach in 2020-2021.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-29 Print Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0121
Maarten Homburg, Marjolein Berger, Matthijs Berends, Eline Meijer, Thijmen Kupers, Lotte Ramerman, Corinne Rijpkema, Evelien de Schepper, Tim Olde Hartman, Jean Muris, Robert Verheij, Lilian Peters
{"title":"Dutch GP healthcare consumption in COVID-19 heterogeneous regions: an interregional time-series approach in 2020-2021.","authors":"Maarten Homburg, Marjolein Berger, Matthijs Berends, Eline Meijer, Thijmen Kupers, Lotte Ramerman, Corinne Rijpkema, Evelien de Schepper, Tim Olde Hartman, Jean Muris, Robert Verheij, Lilian Peters","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many countries observed a sharp decline in the use of general practice services after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, research has not yet considered how changes in healthcare consumption varied among regions with the same restrictive measures but different COVID-19 prevalence.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected healthcare consumption in Dutch general practice during 2020 and 2021, among regions with known heterogeneity in COVID-19 prevalence, from a pre-pandemic baseline in 2019.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Population-based cohort study using electronic health records. The study was undertaken in Dutch general practices involved in regional research networks.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An interrupted time-series analysis of changes in healthcare consumption from before to during the pandemic was performed. Descriptive statistics were used on the number of potential COVID-19-related contacts, reason for contact, and type of contact.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study covered 3 595 802 contacts (425 639 patients), 3 506 637 contacts (433 340 patients), and 4 105 413 contacts (434 872 patients) in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Time-series analysis revealed a significant decrease in healthcare consumption after the outbreak of the pandemic. Despite interregional heterogeneity in COVID-19 prevalence, healthcare consumption decreased comparably over time in the three regions, before rebounding to a level significantly higher than baseline in 2021. Physical consultations transitioned to phone or digital over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare consumption decreased irrespective of the regional prevalence of COVID-19 from the start of the pandemic, with the Delta variant triggering a further decrease. Overall, changes in care consumption appeared to reflect contextual factors and societal restrictions rather than infection rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many countries observed a sharp decline in the use of general practice services after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, research has not yet considered how changes in healthcare consumption varied among regions with the same restrictive measures but different COVID-19 prevalence.

Aim: To investigate how the COVID-19 pandemic affected healthcare consumption in Dutch general practice during 2020 and 2021, among regions with known heterogeneity in COVID-19 prevalence, from a pre-pandemic baseline in 2019.

Design & setting: Population-based cohort study using electronic health records. The study was undertaken in Dutch general practices involved in regional research networks.

Method: An interrupted time-series analysis of changes in healthcare consumption from before to during the pandemic was performed. Descriptive statistics were used on the number of potential COVID-19-related contacts, reason for contact, and type of contact.

Results: The study covered 3 595 802 contacts (425 639 patients), 3 506 637 contacts (433 340 patients), and 4 105 413 contacts (434 872 patients) in 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. Time-series analysis revealed a significant decrease in healthcare consumption after the outbreak of the pandemic. Despite interregional heterogeneity in COVID-19 prevalence, healthcare consumption decreased comparably over time in the three regions, before rebounding to a level significantly higher than baseline in 2021. Physical consultations transitioned to phone or digital over time.

Conclusion: Healthcare consumption decreased irrespective of the regional prevalence of COVID-19 from the start of the pandemic, with the Delta variant triggering a further decrease. Overall, changes in care consumption appeared to reflect contextual factors and societal restrictions rather than infection rates.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 异构地区的荷兰 GP 医疗消费:2020-2021 年地区间时间序列方法。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行爆发后,许多国家发现全科医疗服务的使用率急剧下降。目的:调查 COVID-19 大流行如何影响 2020 年和 2021 年荷兰全科医疗服务的医疗消费:设计:基于人群的队列研究,使用电子健康记录:方法:间断时间序列分析:方法: 对大流行前到大流行期间的医疗消费变化进行间断时间序列分析。对与 COVID-19 相关的潜在接触者人数、接触原因和接触类型进行描述性统计:研究分别涵盖了 2019 年、2020 年和 2021 年的 3 627 597 名接触者(425 639 名患者)、3 532 693 名接触者(433 340 名患者)和 4 134 636 名接触者(434 872 名患者)。时间序列分析显示,大流行爆发后,医疗保健消费大幅下降。尽管地区间 COVID-19 感染率存在差异,但三个地区的医疗消费随时间的推移下降幅度相当,2021 年反弹至明显高于基线的水平。随着时间的推移,物理咨询过渡到了电话或数字咨询:结论:从大流行开始,无论COVID-19在哪个地区流行,医疗消费都会下降,而Delta变异体会导致医疗消费进一步下降。总体而言,医疗消费的变化似乎反映了环境因素和社会限制,而不是感染率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interaction patterns among risk factors for bladder cancer in adults with type 2 diabetes managed in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. The role of reflexivity in exploring exclusion in GP training: a qualitative study of GP educators. Personalising renal function monitoring and interventions in people living with heart failure: a protocol for co-designing a care pathway in the RENAL-HF programme. Challenges in reducing the 10-item CARE Measure to a two-item version: comparison of patients' preferences with psychometric evaluation in a cross-sectional survey in Scotland. Has the new Scottish GP contract improved GPs' working lives in deprived areas? A secondary analysis of two cross-sectional national surveys of GPs' views in 2018 and 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1