Exploring Electrode Placements to Optimize the Identification and Measurement of Early Auditory Evoked Potentials.

IF 2.1 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Audiology Research Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.3390/audiolres13060085
Kailyn A McFarlane, Jason Tait Sanchez
{"title":"Exploring Electrode Placements to Optimize the Identification and Measurement of Early Auditory Evoked Potentials.","authors":"Kailyn A McFarlane, Jason Tait Sanchez","doi":"10.3390/audiolres13060085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cochlear synaptic loss (termed cochlear synaptopathy) has been suggested to contribute to suprathreshold hearing difficulties. However, its existence and putative effects in humans remain inconclusive, largely due to the heterogeneous methods used across studies to indirectly evaluate the health of cochlear synapses. There is a need to standardize proxies of cochlear synaptopathy to appropriately compare and interpret findings across studies. Early auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), including the compound action potential (AP)/Wave I of the auditory brainstem response are a popular proxy, yet remain variable based on technical considerations. This study evaluated one such consideration-electrode array (i.e., montage)-to optimize the use of early AEP waveforms. In 35 young adults, electrocochleography (ECochG) responses were collected using vertical and horizontal montages. Standard ECochG measures and AP/Wave I and Wave II peak-to-trough amplitudes and latencies were compared between montages. Vertical montage recordings consistently produced significantly larger AP/Wave I peak-to-trough amplitudes compared to horizontal recordings. These findings support the use of a vertical electrode montage for optimal recordings of peripheral cochlear nerve activity. As cochlear synaptopathy continues to be explored in humans, the methods highlighted here should be considered in the development of a standardized assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10740558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13060085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cochlear synaptic loss (termed cochlear synaptopathy) has been suggested to contribute to suprathreshold hearing difficulties. However, its existence and putative effects in humans remain inconclusive, largely due to the heterogeneous methods used across studies to indirectly evaluate the health of cochlear synapses. There is a need to standardize proxies of cochlear synaptopathy to appropriately compare and interpret findings across studies. Early auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), including the compound action potential (AP)/Wave I of the auditory brainstem response are a popular proxy, yet remain variable based on technical considerations. This study evaluated one such consideration-electrode array (i.e., montage)-to optimize the use of early AEP waveforms. In 35 young adults, electrocochleography (ECochG) responses were collected using vertical and horizontal montages. Standard ECochG measures and AP/Wave I and Wave II peak-to-trough amplitudes and latencies were compared between montages. Vertical montage recordings consistently produced significantly larger AP/Wave I peak-to-trough amplitudes compared to horizontal recordings. These findings support the use of a vertical electrode montage for optimal recordings of peripheral cochlear nerve activity. As cochlear synaptopathy continues to be explored in humans, the methods highlighted here should be considered in the development of a standardized assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索电极位置,优化早期听觉诱发电位的识别和测量。
耳蜗突触损失(称为耳蜗突触病)被认为是造成阈上听力障碍的原因之一。然而,耳蜗突触损失的存在及其对人类的影响仍无定论,这主要是由于不同研究采用了不同的方法来间接评估耳蜗突触的健康状况。有必要对耳蜗突触病的替代指标进行标准化,以便对不同研究的结果进行适当的比较和解释。早期听觉诱发电位(AEP),包括听性脑干反应的复合动作电位(AP)/I 波,是一种常用的替代指标,但由于技术上的考虑因素,其结果仍不尽相同。本研究对电极阵列(即蒙太奇)进行了评估,以优化早期 AEP 波形的使用。在 35 名年轻成人中,使用垂直和水平蒙太奇收集了耳电图(ECochG)反应。比较了不同蒙太奇的标准 ECochG 测量值、AP/波 I 和波 II 的峰-谷振幅和潜伏期。与水平记录相比,垂直蒙太奇记录产生的 AP/Wave I 峰-涛振幅明显更大。这些发现支持使用垂直电极蒙太奇对外周耳蜗神经活动进行最佳记录。随着人们对耳蜗突触病的不断探索,在制定标准化评估方法时应考虑本文强调的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
期刊最新文献
A New Suppression Index Calculation Using the Visually Enhanced Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Suppression Paradigms in the Video Head Impulse Test. Middle Ear Active Implant Indications, Comparative Audiometric Results from Different Approaches, and Coupling with the Vibrant Soundbridge®: A Single Center Experience over More Than 20 Years. Etiology, Diagnostic, and Rehabilitative Methods for Children with Central Auditory Processing Disorders-A Scoping Review. Outcome of Primary Stapedotomy in 21 Consecutive Cases of Juvenile Otosclerosis. Advancements in Pediatric Audiological Assessments Using Wideband Acoustic Immittance: A Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1