Lance M Mabry, Aaron Keil, Brian A Young, Nicholas Reilly, Michael D Ross, Angela Spontelli Gisselman, Don Goss
{"title":"Physical therapist awareness of diagnostic imaging referral jurisdictional scope of practice: an observational study.","authors":"Lance M Mabry, Aaron Keil, Brian A Young, Nicholas Reilly, Michael D Ross, Angela Spontelli Gisselman, Don Goss","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2023.2296260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine physical therapist awareness and utilization of imaging referral privileges in the United States (US) and how it relates to direct access frequency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized survey data collected in 2020-2021 from US physical therapists. Subjects were asked about imaging referral jurisdictional authority in their state. Responses were analyzed for accuracy and compared to the level of jurisdictional authority and its impact on imaging referral. Analysis of imaging skills performance and imaging referral practices were compared to direct access frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 42.0% of physical therapists practicing in states that allow imaging referral were aware of this privilege. Those practicing where imaging referral was allowed via state legislation were significantly more likely (<i>p</i> < 0.01) to be aware of this privilege (71.4%) compared to those granted by the state board (25.2%). Those aware of their imaging referral scope were more likely (<i>p</i> < 0.01) to practice imaging referral (44.5%) compared to those who were unaware (3.2%). Direct access frequency was positively associated with imaging skill performance and imaging referral practice (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Doctors of Physical Therapy, residency/fellowship-trained physical therapists, and board-certified physical therapists all reported practicing greater frequency of direct access (<i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>There is a striking lack of awareness of imaging privileges among physical therapists as influenced by the level of jurisdictional scope. These results suggest that the lack of awareness may have a dampening effect on diagnostic imaging referrals. The American Physical Therapy Association should consider engaging with state boards to raise imaging privilege awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"435-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2023.2296260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To examine physical therapist awareness and utilization of imaging referral privileges in the United States (US) and how it relates to direct access frequency.
Methods: This study utilized survey data collected in 2020-2021 from US physical therapists. Subjects were asked about imaging referral jurisdictional authority in their state. Responses were analyzed for accuracy and compared to the level of jurisdictional authority and its impact on imaging referral. Analysis of imaging skills performance and imaging referral practices were compared to direct access frequency.
Results: Only 42.0% of physical therapists practicing in states that allow imaging referral were aware of this privilege. Those practicing where imaging referral was allowed via state legislation were significantly more likely (p < 0.01) to be aware of this privilege (71.4%) compared to those granted by the state board (25.2%). Those aware of their imaging referral scope were more likely (p < 0.01) to practice imaging referral (44.5%) compared to those who were unaware (3.2%). Direct access frequency was positively associated with imaging skill performance and imaging referral practice (p < 0.01). Doctors of Physical Therapy, residency/fellowship-trained physical therapists, and board-certified physical therapists all reported practicing greater frequency of direct access (p < 0.01).
Discussion/conclusion: There is a striking lack of awareness of imaging privileges among physical therapists as influenced by the level of jurisdictional scope. These results suggest that the lack of awareness may have a dampening effect on diagnostic imaging referrals. The American Physical Therapy Association should consider engaging with state boards to raise imaging privilege awareness.
目的研究美国物理治疗师对影像转诊权限的认识和使用情况,以及它与直接就诊频率的关系:本研究利用了 2020-2021 年从美国物理治疗师处收集的调查数据。调查对象被问及所在州的影像转诊管辖权限。对回答的准确性进行分析,并将其与管辖权限水平及其对影像学转诊的影响进行比较。对成像技能表现和成像转诊实践的分析与直接访问频率进行了比较:结果:在允许影像转诊的州执业的物理治疗师中,只有 42.0% 意识到这一特权。在州立法允许影像学转诊的地区执业的物理治疗师意识到这一特权的比例明显更高(p p p p 讨论/结论:受管辖范围的影响,物理治疗师对影像学特权的认识明显不足。这些结果表明,缺乏认识可能会对影像诊断转诊产生抑制作用。美国物理治疗协会应考虑与各州委员会合作,提高对成像特权的认识。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician