Hematological parameters: is there a difference between those released by the hematological analyzer and to the customer?

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2023-12-22 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0501
Jhenifer Monique Pinto, Leilismara Sousa Nogueira, Danyelle Romana Alves Rios
{"title":"Hematological parameters: is there a difference between those released by the hematological analyzer and to the customer?","authors":"Jhenifer Monique Pinto, Leilismara Sousa Nogueira, Danyelle Romana Alves Rios","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the hematological parameters released by hematological analyzers with those released in customer reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a descriptive study in the laboratories of a medium-sized municipality in the state of Minas Gerais registered in the National Register of Health Establishments. Interviews were conducted using a questionnaire to obtain information regarding the parameters released by the analyzers and those available in the customer's report.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen laboratories were evaluated, and none of them released all the parameters obtained from the hematological analyzers to customers. The red blood cell distribution width was released in 88% of the laboratories, atypical lymphocytes in 70%, mean platelet volume in 50%, platelet distribution width and platelet count in 20%. No laboratory released information on reticulocytes, fraction of immature reticulocytes and immature granulocytes, nucleated erythrocyte count, immature platelet fraction and reticulocyte hemoglobin, and large platelet rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All evaluated clinical analysis laboratories had at least one parameter that was not released in the customer's report despite being released by the hematological analyzers. The lack of knowledge on the part of professionals about the clinical importance of each parameter of the complete blood count results in a loss in patient assessment, and it is important to include these parameters in the complete blood count report.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10730264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the hematological parameters released by hematological analyzers with those released in customer reports.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive study in the laboratories of a medium-sized municipality in the state of Minas Gerais registered in the National Register of Health Establishments. Interviews were conducted using a questionnaire to obtain information regarding the parameters released by the analyzers and those available in the customer's report.

Results: Sixteen laboratories were evaluated, and none of them released all the parameters obtained from the hematological analyzers to customers. The red blood cell distribution width was released in 88% of the laboratories, atypical lymphocytes in 70%, mean platelet volume in 50%, platelet distribution width and platelet count in 20%. No laboratory released information on reticulocytes, fraction of immature reticulocytes and immature granulocytes, nucleated erythrocyte count, immature platelet fraction and reticulocyte hemoglobin, and large platelet rate.

Conclusion: All evaluated clinical analysis laboratories had at least one parameter that was not released in the customer's report despite being released by the hematological analyzers. The lack of knowledge on the part of professionals about the clinical importance of each parameter of the complete blood count results in a loss in patient assessment, and it is important to include these parameters in the complete blood count report.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液参数:血液分析仪发布的参数与客户获得的参数是否存在差异?
研究目的本研究旨在比较血液分析仪公布的血液学参数与客户报告中公布的参数:我们在米纳斯吉拉斯州一个在国家卫生机构登记册上注册的中型城市的实验室进行了一项描述性研究。采用问卷调查的方式进行了访谈,以获取有关分析仪发布的参数和客户报告中提供的参数的信息:结果:对 16 家实验室进行了评估,其中没有一家实验室向客户公布血液分析仪获得的所有参数。88%的实验室公布了红细胞分布宽度,70%的实验室公布了非典型淋巴细胞,50%的实验室公布了血小板平均体积,20%的实验室公布了血小板分布宽度和血小板计数。没有实验室公布网织红细胞、未成熟网织红细胞和未成熟粒细胞比例、有核红细胞计数、未成熟血小板比例和网织红细胞血红蛋白以及大血小板率的信息:所有接受评估的临床分析实验室都至少有一项参数没有在客户报告中公布,尽管血液分析仪已经公布了这些参数。由于专业人员不了解全血细胞计数各参数的临床重要性,导致对患者评估的失误,因此将这些参数纳入全血细胞计数报告非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Point prevalence and risk factors for pressure ulcers in hospitalized adult patients: a cross-sectional study. Swimming training prevents obesity installation and normalizes hypothalamic expressions of GLP1 and leptin receptors in adult offspring born in small litters. Prevalence and risk factors of Burnout syndrome among intensive care unit members during the second wave of COVID-19: a single-center study. Current status of laparoscopy teaching in gynecology and obstetrics medical residency in Brazil. Comparison of the effects of high-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure treatments as respiratory physiotherapy interventions for children with asthma exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1