Expressive writing to address distress in hospitalized adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-22 DOI:10.1080/07347332.2023.2296619
Morgan M Nakatani, Susan C Locke, Kris W Herring, Tamara Somers, Thomas W LeBlanc
{"title":"Expressive writing to address distress in hospitalized adults with acute myeloid leukemia: a pilot randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Morgan M Nakatani, Susan C Locke, Kris W Herring, Tamara Somers, Thomas W LeBlanc","doi":"10.1080/07347332.2023.2296619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience significant distress. Expressive writing is an intervention designed to improve well-being by encouraging expression of emotions related to traumatic experiences. Expressive writing has been shown to be generally feasible and effective at improving the cancer experience but has not been examined in patients with recently diagnosed hematologic malignancies. We examined the feasibility of an expressive writing intervention for hospitalized patients with AML receiving induction chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen hospitalized AML patients were randomized to complete expressive writing or neutral prompts. Feasibility was defined as 80% of enrolled subjects completing the study. Participants completed validated questionnaires measuring depression, anxiety, resilience, rumination, and quality of life at baseline, completion of the second and fourth writing exercises, and 3 months after enrollment. Participants also completed post-writing surveys following the writing exercise to reflect on the experience.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We enrolled 15 participants and 8 of 15 subjects (53%) completed the study. Due to low enrollment, we examined the pre-to-post intervention changes, rather than comparing results across intervention arms. Pre-to-post intervention changes in the expected direction were seen at the second assessment for depression and resilience, at the fourth assessment for rumination, emotional well-being, and social well-being, and at the 3-month follow-up for anxiety and emotional well-being. Similar changes in patient-reported outcomes were also seen in the control condition. Participants who completed the intervention reported the experience was meaningful and were able to express their deepest thoughts and feelings, more so than participants in the control arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our work, the expressive writing intervention was not found to be feasible. The trial was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic which likely impacted the feasibility. Future studies should aim to identify ways to make the intervention more accessible, such as developing an electronic application for expressive writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"587-603"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosocial Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2023.2296619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience significant distress. Expressive writing is an intervention designed to improve well-being by encouraging expression of emotions related to traumatic experiences. Expressive writing has been shown to be generally feasible and effective at improving the cancer experience but has not been examined in patients with recently diagnosed hematologic malignancies. We examined the feasibility of an expressive writing intervention for hospitalized patients with AML receiving induction chemotherapy.

Methods: Fifteen hospitalized AML patients were randomized to complete expressive writing or neutral prompts. Feasibility was defined as 80% of enrolled subjects completing the study. Participants completed validated questionnaires measuring depression, anxiety, resilience, rumination, and quality of life at baseline, completion of the second and fourth writing exercises, and 3 months after enrollment. Participants also completed post-writing surveys following the writing exercise to reflect on the experience.

Findings: We enrolled 15 participants and 8 of 15 subjects (53%) completed the study. Due to low enrollment, we examined the pre-to-post intervention changes, rather than comparing results across intervention arms. Pre-to-post intervention changes in the expected direction were seen at the second assessment for depression and resilience, at the fourth assessment for rumination, emotional well-being, and social well-being, and at the 3-month follow-up for anxiety and emotional well-being. Similar changes in patient-reported outcomes were also seen in the control condition. Participants who completed the intervention reported the experience was meaningful and were able to express their deepest thoughts and feelings, more so than participants in the control arm.

Conclusion: In our work, the expressive writing intervention was not found to be feasible. The trial was interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic which likely impacted the feasibility. Future studies should aim to identify ways to make the intervention more accessible, such as developing an electronic application for expressive writing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过表达性写作解决急性髓性白血病住院成人患者的痛苦:一项试点随机临床试验。
目的:急性髓性白血病(AML)患者会经历巨大的痛苦。表达性写作是一种干预措施,旨在通过鼓励患者表达与创伤经历相关的情绪来改善他们的健康状况。表达性写作已被证明在改善癌症经历方面普遍可行且有效,但尚未对新近确诊的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者进行过研究。我们研究了对接受诱导化疗的住院急性髓细胞白血病患者进行表达性写作干预的可行性:15名住院的急性髓细胞性白血病患者被随机分配完成表达性写作或中性提示。80%的受试者完成研究即为可行性。受试者在基线、完成第二和第四次写作练习以及入组 3 个月后,填写了测量抑郁、焦虑、复原力、反刍和生活质量的有效问卷。参与者还在写作练习后完成了写作后调查,以反思写作经历:我们招募了 15 名参与者,其中 8 人(53%)完成了研究。由于报名人数较少,我们对干预前与干预后的变化进行了研究,而不是对不同干预措施的结果进行比较。在第二次评估中,抑郁和恢复能力出现了干预前与干预后的预期变化;在第四次评估中,反刍、情绪幸福感和社会幸福感出现了预期变化;在三个月的随访中,焦虑和情绪幸福感出现了预期变化。在对照组中,患者报告的结果也发生了类似的变化。与对照组相比,完成干预的参与者表示这次经历很有意义,他们能够表达自己内心深处的想法和感受:结论:在我们的工作中,发现表达性写作干预并不可行。试验因 COVID-19 大流行而中断,这很可能影响了可行性。未来的研究应致力于找出使干预更易操作的方法,例如开发一种用于表达性写作的电子应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology
Journal of Psychosocial Oncology PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Here is your single source of integrated information on providing the best psychosocial care possible from the knowledge available from many disciplines.The Journal of Psychosocial Oncology is an essential source for up-to-date clinical and research material geared toward health professionals who provide psychosocial services to cancer patients, their families, and their caregivers. The journal—the first interdisciplinary resource of its kind—is in its third decade of examining exploratory and hypothesis testing and presenting program evaluation research on critical areas, including: the stigma of cancer; employment and personal problems facing cancer patients; patient education.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Understanding the patient-spouse communication experience during chemotherapy for gastric cancer: A qualitative study. Quality of life and unmet needs of late-stage and metastatic colorectal cancer survivors: An integrative review. The meaning-making process in the re-entry phase: A qualitative focus group study with patients treated for breast cancer or melanoma. Adaptation and feasibility of the Swedish Promoting Resilience in Stress Management intervention targeting adolescents and young adults newly diagnosed with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1