Variation of Practice in Prophylactic Protocol to Reduce Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A National Survey in the United Kingdom.

Hip & pelvis Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.5371/hp.2023.35.4.228
James Morris, Lee Hoggett, Sophie Rogers, John Ranson, Andrew Sloan
{"title":"Variation of Practice in Prophylactic Protocol to Reduce Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A National Survey in the United Kingdom.","authors":"James Morris, Lee Hoggett, Sophie Rogers, John Ranson, Andrew Sloan","doi":"10.5371/hp.2023.35.4.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has an enormous physiological and psychological burden on patients. Surgeons rightly wish to minimise this risk. It has been shown that a standardised, evidence-based approach to perioperative care leads to better patient outcomes. A review of current practice was conducted using a cross-sectional survey among surgeons at multiple centers nationwide.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An 11-question electronic survey was circulated to hip and knee arthroplasty consultants nationally via the BOA (British Orthopaedic Association) e-newsletter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The respondents included 56 consultants working across 19 different trusts. Thirty-four (60.7%) screen patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) preoperatively, with 19 (55.9%) would treating with antibiotics. Fifty-six (100%) screen for methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and treat if positive. Only 15 (26.8%) screen for methicillin-sensitive <i>S. aureus</i> (MSSA) or empirically eradicate. Zero (0%) routinely catheterise patients perioperatively. Forty-one (73.2%) would give intramuscular or intravenous gentamicin for a perioperative catheterisation. All surgeons use laminar flow theatres. Twenty-six (46.4%) use only an impervious gown, 6 (10.7%) exhaust pipes, and 24 (42.3%) surgical helmet system. Five different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens are used 9 (16.1%) cefuroxime, 2 (3.6%) flucloxacillin, 19 (33.9%) flucloxacillin and gentamicin, 10 (17.9%) teicoplanin, 16 (28.6%) teicoplanin and gentamicin. Twenty-two (39.3%) routinely give further doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ASB screening, treatment and intramuscular gentamicin for perioperative catheterisation is routinely practiced despite no supporting evidence base. MSSA screening and treatment is underutilised. Multiple antibiotic regimens exist despite little variation in organisms in PJI. Practice varies between surgeons and centers, we should all be practicing evidence-based medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"35 4","pages":"228-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2023.35.4.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has an enormous physiological and psychological burden on patients. Surgeons rightly wish to minimise this risk. It has been shown that a standardised, evidence-based approach to perioperative care leads to better patient outcomes. A review of current practice was conducted using a cross-sectional survey among surgeons at multiple centers nationwide.

Materials and methods: An 11-question electronic survey was circulated to hip and knee arthroplasty consultants nationally via the BOA (British Orthopaedic Association) e-newsletter.

Results: The respondents included 56 consultants working across 19 different trusts. Thirty-four (60.7%) screen patients for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) preoperatively, with 19 (55.9%) would treating with antibiotics. Fifty-six (100%) screen for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and treat if positive. Only 15 (26.8%) screen for methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) or empirically eradicate. Zero (0%) routinely catheterise patients perioperatively. Forty-one (73.2%) would give intramuscular or intravenous gentamicin for a perioperative catheterisation. All surgeons use laminar flow theatres. Twenty-six (46.4%) use only an impervious gown, 6 (10.7%) exhaust pipes, and 24 (42.3%) surgical helmet system. Five different antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens are used 9 (16.1%) cefuroxime, 2 (3.6%) flucloxacillin, 19 (33.9%) flucloxacillin and gentamicin, 10 (17.9%) teicoplanin, 16 (28.6%) teicoplanin and gentamicin. Twenty-two (39.3%) routinely give further doses.

Conclusion: ASB screening, treatment and intramuscular gentamicin for perioperative catheterisation is routinely practiced despite no supporting evidence base. MSSA screening and treatment is underutilised. Multiple antibiotic regimens exist despite little variation in organisms in PJI. Practice varies between surgeons and centers, we should all be practicing evidence-based medicine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少初级髋关节和膝关节置换术中人工关节感染的预防性方案的实践差异:英国全国调查。
目的:假体关节感染(PJI)会给患者带来巨大的生理和心理负担。外科医生理所当然地希望将这种风险降至最低。事实证明,以证据为基础的标准化围手术期护理方法能为患者带来更好的治疗效果。我们对全国多个中心的外科医生进行了横向调查,对当前的做法进行了回顾:通过 BOA(英国矫形外科协会)电子通讯向全国的髋关节和膝关节置换顾问发放了一份包含 11 个问题的电子调查问卷:调查对象包括在 19 家不同医院工作的 56 名顾问。34人(60.7%)在术前对患者进行无症状菌尿(ASB)筛查,其中19人(55.9%)会使用抗生素治疗。56家(100%)医院筛查耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌,并在结果呈阳性时进行治疗。只有 15 家(26.8%)对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA)进行筛查或经验性根除。没有(0%)对患者进行围手术期常规导管检查。41名外科医生(73.2%)会在围手术期导管插入时肌肉注射或静脉注射庆大霉素。所有外科医生都使用层流手术室。26名外科医生(46.4%)只使用不透水的手术服,6名外科医生(10.7%)使用排气管,24名外科医生(42.3%)使用手术头盔系统。使用五种不同的抗菌药预防方案:9 种(16.1%)头孢呋辛、2 种(3.6%)氟氯西林、19 种(33.9%)氟氯西林和庆大霉素、10 种(17.9%)替考拉宁、16 种(28.6%)替考拉宁和庆大霉素。22(39.3%)例行给予更多剂量:结论:尽管没有证据支持,但围术期导管插入术中的 ASB 筛查、治疗和肌肉注射庆大霉素仍是常规做法。MSSA筛查和治疗未得到充分利用。尽管 PJI 中的病原体差异不大,但仍存在多种抗生素治疗方案。外科医生和医疗中心的做法各不相同,但我们都应该遵循循证医学原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cement Filling Technique to Prevent Greater Trochanter Displacement in Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Technical Note. Change of Sacral Slope according to the Surgical Position in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Complications and Healthcare Cost of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Depressive Disorder. Direct Anterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Single Center Experience. Evidence-based Approach for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1