America's Lacan AprÈs Coup.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1177/00030651231213015
Humphrey Morris
{"title":"America's Lacan <i>AprÈs Coup</i>.","authors":"Humphrey Morris","doi":"10.1177/00030651231213015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lacan's effect in America was dramatic but limited following his 1975 visit. His polemic with ego psychology in <i>Écrits</i> radically changed the way literary critics, notably feminist critics, thought about psychoanalysis, while in those same years-the 1970s and 1980s-American psychoanalysts, taken up with their own reactions to ego psychology, paid him little attention. Yet <i>après coup</i>, looking back at that period, Lacan can be counted among those who contributed importantly to a major shift in our conception of psychoanalytic process: our contemporary sense of acts of reading-including clinical listening-as acts in themselves, rather than as steps toward the interpretive determination of hidden meaning. In acts of reading inspired by Lacan, feminist critics helped free Freud's theory of disavowal from its origins in the male anxieties of the castration complex. Speaking as the disavowed \"others\" of psychoanalysis, Lacan's feminist readers also went beyond him in moving psychoanalysis toward acknowledgment of questions of social and historical reality, including its own. Regarding this evolution, it can be speculated that hidden behind the bitterness of the split in the 1950s and 1960s between Lacan and the once European, now American ego psychologists can be found an unconscious agreement. On both sides of the Atlantic, psychoanalysis had had its reasons, if different reasons, to disavow for years the ways it was implicated in the unspeakable trauma of recent European history.</p>","PeriodicalId":47403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651231213015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lacan's effect in America was dramatic but limited following his 1975 visit. His polemic with ego psychology in Écrits radically changed the way literary critics, notably feminist critics, thought about psychoanalysis, while in those same years-the 1970s and 1980s-American psychoanalysts, taken up with their own reactions to ego psychology, paid him little attention. Yet après coup, looking back at that period, Lacan can be counted among those who contributed importantly to a major shift in our conception of psychoanalytic process: our contemporary sense of acts of reading-including clinical listening-as acts in themselves, rather than as steps toward the interpretive determination of hidden meaning. In acts of reading inspired by Lacan, feminist critics helped free Freud's theory of disavowal from its origins in the male anxieties of the castration complex. Speaking as the disavowed "others" of psychoanalysis, Lacan's feminist readers also went beyond him in moving psychoanalysis toward acknowledgment of questions of social and historical reality, including its own. Regarding this evolution, it can be speculated that hidden behind the bitterness of the split in the 1950s and 1960s between Lacan and the once European, now American ego psychologists can be found an unconscious agreement. On both sides of the Atlantic, psychoanalysis had had its reasons, if different reasons, to disavow for years the ways it was implicated in the unspeakable trauma of recent European history.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的拉康政变
拉康 1975 年访问美国后,在美国产生了巨大的影响,但也很有限。他在《评论》(Écrits)中与自我心理学的论战,从根本上改变了文学评论家,尤其是女权主义评论家对精神分析的看法,而在那些年--20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代--美国的精神分析师们却因为各自对自我心理学的反应而很少关注他。然而,政变之后,回顾那段时期,拉康可以说是对我们精神分析过程概念的重大转变做出了重要贡献的人之一:我们当代意义上的阅读行为--包括临床倾听--本身就是一种行为,而不是朝着解释性地确定隐藏意义的方向迈出的一步。在受拉康启发的阅读行为中,女性主义批评家帮助弗洛伊德的否认理论摆脱了其源于男性阉割情结的焦虑。作为精神分析中被否定的 "他者",拉康的女性主义读者也超越了他,将精神分析推向了对社会和历史现实问题的承认,包括其自身的问题。关于这一演变,我们可以推测,在拉康与曾经的欧洲、现在的美国自我心理学家在 20 世纪五六十年代分裂的痛苦背后,隐藏着一种无意识的一致。在大西洋两岸,精神分析都有自己的理由,即使是不同的理由,多年来都在否认自己与欧洲近代史难以言喻的创伤有牵连。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association (JAPA) is the preeminent North American psychoanalytic scholarly journal in terms of number of subscriptions, frequency of citation in other scholarly works and the preeminence of its authors. Published bimonthly, this peer-reviewed publication is an invaluable resouce for psychoanalysts, psychologists, psychiatrists, and other mental health professionals. APsaA member Steven T. Levy, M.D. serves as editor of JAPA. JAPA publishes original articles, research, plenary presentations, panel reports, abstracts, commentaries, editorials and correspondence. In addition, the JAPA Review of Books provides in-depth reviews of recent literature.
期刊最新文献
Consciousness, Cortex, and Neuropsychoanalysis Book Review: Hating, Abhorring and Wishing to Destroy: Psychoanalytic Essays on the Contemporary Moment Book Review: Gender Without Identity Why I Write: The Winged Word Introduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1