Effect of processing on resistant starch content of Indian rice varieties (Sona Masuri and Mogra) and its impact on postprandial blood glucose levels

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Malaysian Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.31246/mjn-2022-0139
Sakshi Mishra, Madhvi Awasthi, Mahak Sharma
{"title":"Effect of processing on resistant starch content of Indian rice varieties (Sona Masuri and Mogra) and its impact on postprandial blood glucose levels","authors":"Sakshi Mishra, Madhvi Awasthi, Mahak Sharma","doi":"10.31246/mjn-2022-0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Resistant starch has elicited new possibilities around the globe due to its plausible health benefits and functional properties. This research aimed to evaluate the effect of processing on the resistant starch content in selected Indian rice varieties and its effect on postprandial blood glucose levels. Methods: Two Indian rice varieties (Sona Masuri and Mogra) were evaluated for resistant starch in raw form, after boiling, steaming, and refrigeration. Thereafter, the increment in resistance starch content by different processing methods was validated by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on ten healthy participants. Results: Among the two rice varieties, raw Sona Masuri had a higher resistance starch content (10.86%). After processing, resistant starch was observed to be high in steamed Mogra variety (3.52%). In the boiling process, Sona Masuri developed a higher resistant starch content (2.44%) as compared to Mogra variety (1.05%). The assessment done after refrigeration revealed a slight increase in resistant starch content in both rice varieties. Mogra variety had higher resistant starch (3.68%) than the other rice variety (2.56%) after refrigeration. Validation of increase in resistant starch content and its effect on blood glucose responses done through OGTT revealed that Mogra rice (test food) did not cause a swift spike in blood glucose level compared to glucose (reference food). Differences in blood glucose responses by test and reference food at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes were statistically significant. Conclusion: Steamed and refrigerated Mogra rice did not cause significant increase in blood glucose.","PeriodicalId":18207,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Nutrition","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31246/mjn-2022-0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Resistant starch has elicited new possibilities around the globe due to its plausible health benefits and functional properties. This research aimed to evaluate the effect of processing on the resistant starch content in selected Indian rice varieties and its effect on postprandial blood glucose levels. Methods: Two Indian rice varieties (Sona Masuri and Mogra) were evaluated for resistant starch in raw form, after boiling, steaming, and refrigeration. Thereafter, the increment in resistance starch content by different processing methods was validated by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on ten healthy participants. Results: Among the two rice varieties, raw Sona Masuri had a higher resistance starch content (10.86%). After processing, resistant starch was observed to be high in steamed Mogra variety (3.52%). In the boiling process, Sona Masuri developed a higher resistant starch content (2.44%) as compared to Mogra variety (1.05%). The assessment done after refrigeration revealed a slight increase in resistant starch content in both rice varieties. Mogra variety had higher resistant starch (3.68%) than the other rice variety (2.56%) after refrigeration. Validation of increase in resistant starch content and its effect on blood glucose responses done through OGTT revealed that Mogra rice (test food) did not cause a swift spike in blood glucose level compared to glucose (reference food). Differences in blood glucose responses by test and reference food at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes were statistically significant. Conclusion: Steamed and refrigerated Mogra rice did not cause significant increase in blood glucose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加工对印度大米品种(Sona Masuri 和 Mogra)抗性淀粉含量的影响及其对餐后血糖水平的影响
导言:抗性淀粉因其合理的健康益处和功能特性,在全球范围内激发了新的可能性。本研究旨在评估加工过程对印度大米抗性淀粉含量的影响及其对餐后血糖水平的影响。研究方法对两个印度大米品种(Sona Masuri 和 Mogra)的抗性淀粉含量进行了评估。之后,通过对 10 名健康参与者进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT),验证了不同加工方法增加的抗性淀粉含量。结果显示在两个大米品种中,生的 Sona Masuri 抗性淀粉含量较高(10.86%)。经过加工后,蒸熟的莫格拉品种抗性淀粉含量较高(3.52%)。与莫格拉品种(1.05%)相比,在煮沸过程中,索娜马苏里的抗性淀粉含量更高(2.44%)。冷藏后进行的评估显示,两个大米品种的抗性淀粉含量都略有增加。冷藏后,莫格拉品种的抗性淀粉含量(3.68%)高于其他大米品种(2.56%)。通过 OGTT 验证抗性淀粉含量的增加及其对血糖反应的影响后发现,与葡萄糖(参考食物)相比,莫格拉大米(测试食物)不会导致血糖迅速飙升。测试食物和参考食物在 0、30、60、90 和 120 分钟的血糖反应差异在统计学上有显著意义。结论蒸煮和冷藏的莫格拉大米不会导致血糖显著升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25(OH) D levels and blood pressure among the elderly in a nursing house: A double-blind, randomised placebocontrolled trial Plasma amino acid profiles in thalassaemia major with iron overload Factors affecting stunting in children aged 6-23 months in South Sumatra Province, Indonesia Infant feeding practices and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from an online crosssectional study in Indonesia Predictors for 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in early pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1