Developing Defences for Fashion Upcycling in EU Trademark Law

Martin Senftleben
{"title":"Developing Defences for Fashion Upcycling in EU Trademark Law","authors":"Martin Senftleben","doi":"10.1093/grurint/ikad131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Trademarked fashion items pose a particular obstacle to reuse projects in the circular economy. By granting broad exclusive rights, EU trademark law exposes sustainable reuse practices, such as upcycling, to allegations of infringement ranging from (post-sale) confusion to blurring, tarnishment and unfair freeriding. Against that background, this analysis explores strategies to assure fashion re-users that, as long as they do not specifically aim to mislead consumers or damage and exploit protected brand insignia, they can rework trademarked fashion items without risking the verdict of infringement. Two options for enhancing legal certainty will be explored: the first consists in adopting a strict test for ‘use as a trademark’ that could immunise sustainable fashion reuse against allegations of trademark infringement on the ground that consumers understand the specific reuse context and perceive third-party trademarks on circular economy products as mere decorative elements. The second option involves strengthening defences, in particular the referential use defence, by developing labelling guidelines that allow fashion re-users to ensure compliance with the requirement of honest practices in industrial or commercial matters.","PeriodicalId":432164,"journal":{"name":"GRUR International","volume":"72 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GRUR International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trademarked fashion items pose a particular obstacle to reuse projects in the circular economy. By granting broad exclusive rights, EU trademark law exposes sustainable reuse practices, such as upcycling, to allegations of infringement ranging from (post-sale) confusion to blurring, tarnishment and unfair freeriding. Against that background, this analysis explores strategies to assure fashion re-users that, as long as they do not specifically aim to mislead consumers or damage and exploit protected brand insignia, they can rework trademarked fashion items without risking the verdict of infringement. Two options for enhancing legal certainty will be explored: the first consists in adopting a strict test for ‘use as a trademark’ that could immunise sustainable fashion reuse against allegations of trademark infringement on the ground that consumers understand the specific reuse context and perceive third-party trademarks on circular economy products as mere decorative elements. The second option involves strengthening defences, in particular the referential use defence, by developing labelling guidelines that allow fashion re-users to ensure compliance with the requirement of honest practices in industrial or commercial matters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在欧盟商标法中为时装升级再造制定辩护条款
有商标的时尚产品对循环经济中的再利用项目构成了特别的障碍。欧盟商标法通过授予广泛的专有权,使升级再造等可持续再利用行为面临侵权指控,包括(售后)混淆、模糊、玷污和不公平的自由利用。在此背景下,本分析报告探讨了向时装再利用者保证的策略,即只要他们不以误导消费者或破坏和利用受保护的品牌徽章为具体目的,他们就可以对商标时装进行再加工,而不必冒被判定侵权的风险。我们将探讨两种提高法律确定性的方案:第一种方案是采用严格的 "作为商标使用 "的测试标准,使可持续时装的再利用免于商标侵权指控,理由是消费者了解具体的再利用背景,并将循环经济产品上的第三方商标视为单纯的装饰元素。第二种选择是加强抗辩,特别是指代性使用抗辩,制定标签准则,使时装再利用者能够确保遵守工业或商业事务中诚实做法的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Authorship Status Derived from the Complementarity of Contracts Determining a Country Where a Satellite Broadcast Has Been Made Resale Price Maintenance Practices as a Continuing Offence Clarifying the Revocation Right and the 14-Day Objection Period in Terms of Statutory Exceptions Imposing Administrative Pecuniary Sanctions under the GDPR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1