Evidencing the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses: a multi-stakeholder perspective on study requirements

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2023.1213752
H. Jones, Alix Chadwell, Matthew Dyson
{"title":"Evidencing the effectiveness of upper limb prostheses: a multi-stakeholder perspective on study requirements","authors":"H. Jones, Alix Chadwell, Matthew Dyson","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2023.1213752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The provision of upper limb prosthetic devices through the National Health Services (NHS) within the United Kingdom is driven by national policies. NHS England have recently published a new policy to provide multi-grip myoelectric hands. The policy highlighted that there was limited evidence to support its deployment and it will be reviewed should new information arise. The clear identification of the evidence gap provides an opportunity for the academic research community to conduct studies that will inform future iterations of this and other upper limb prosthetic related policies. This paper presents a summary of findings and recommendations based on two multi-stakeholder workshops held in June 2022 and July 2022, which explored the design requirements for policy-driven research studies. The workshops involved people from a broad range of stakeholder groups: policy, academia, NHS clinical and management, industry, and a person with upper limb absence. The workshop discussions focused on the research questions that NHS England identified in the policy evidence review: (1) Clinical Effectiveness; (2) Cost Effectiveness; (3) Safety; and (4) Patient Subgroups. The recommendations based on stakeholder discussions included the need to gather qualitative and quantitative research evidence, use goal-based outcome measures, and conduct longitudinal studies. Future research studies also need to address the complexities of conducting national and international policy-driven research, such as clinical resource capacity and participant involvement.","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1213752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The provision of upper limb prosthetic devices through the National Health Services (NHS) within the United Kingdom is driven by national policies. NHS England have recently published a new policy to provide multi-grip myoelectric hands. The policy highlighted that there was limited evidence to support its deployment and it will be reviewed should new information arise. The clear identification of the evidence gap provides an opportunity for the academic research community to conduct studies that will inform future iterations of this and other upper limb prosthetic related policies. This paper presents a summary of findings and recommendations based on two multi-stakeholder workshops held in June 2022 and July 2022, which explored the design requirements for policy-driven research studies. The workshops involved people from a broad range of stakeholder groups: policy, academia, NHS clinical and management, industry, and a person with upper limb absence. The workshop discussions focused on the research questions that NHS England identified in the policy evidence review: (1) Clinical Effectiveness; (2) Cost Effectiveness; (3) Safety; and (4) Patient Subgroups. The recommendations based on stakeholder discussions included the need to gather qualitative and quantitative research evidence, use goal-based outcome measures, and conduct longitudinal studies. Future research studies also need to address the complexities of conducting national and international policy-driven research, such as clinical resource capacity and participant involvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
证明上肢假肢的有效性:多方利益相关者对研究要求的看法
英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)通过国家政策提供上肢假肢装置。英国国家医疗服务系统(NHS)最近发布了一项新政策,旨在提供多抓握肌电手。该政策强调,支持其部署的证据有限,如果出现新的信息,将对该政策进行审查。对证据差距的明确认定为学术研究界提供了开展研究的机会,从而为该政策及其他上肢假肢相关政策的未来迭代提供依据。本文概述了 2022 年 6 月和 2022 年 7 月举行的两次多方利益相关者研讨会的结论和建议,这两次研讨会探讨了政策驱动型研究的设计要求。参与研讨会的人员来自广泛的利益相关者群体:政策、学术界、国家医疗服务体系临床和管理部门、行业以及一名上肢缺失患者。研讨会讨论的重点是英国国家医疗服务体系在政策证据审查中确定的研究问题:(1) 临床效果;(2) 成本效益;(3) 安全性;以及 (4) 患者亚群。根据利益相关者的讨论提出的建议包括:需要收集定性和定量研究证据、使用基于目标的结果衡量标准并开展纵向研究。未来的研究还需要解决开展国家和国际政策驱动研究的复杂性,如临床资源能力和参与者参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a mobile prosthetic and orthotic care program in the VA; a qualitative study of implementation challenges and associated strategies for improvement. Creating demand for unmet needs: Agile Storytelling. Editorial: Digital health applications: acceptance, benefit assessment, and costs from the perspective of patients and medical professionals. Reported roles of care partners in a specialized weaning centre-perspectives of patients, care partners, and health care providers. Longitudinal analysis of culture of patient safety survey results in surgical departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1