Retinal Vasculitis After Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan: Report From the ASRS Research and Safety in Therapeutics (ReST) Committee

IF 0.5 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1177/24741264231220224
A. Witkin, Glenn J. Jaffe, Sunil K. Srivastava, Janet L. Davis, Judy E. Kim
{"title":"Retinal Vasculitis After Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan: Report From the ASRS Research and Safety in Therapeutics (ReST) Committee","authors":"A. Witkin, Glenn J. Jaffe, Sunil K. Srivastava, Janet L. Davis, Judy E. Kim","doi":"10.1177/24741264231220224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To analyze post-marketing cases of retinal vasculitis after intravitreal pegcetacoplan. Methods: The American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS) Research and Safety in Therapeutics (ReST) Committee as well as an expert panel performed a retrospective review of cases of retinal vasculitis reported to the ASRS. Clinical and imaging characteristics were reviewed for evidence of retinal vasculitis and analyzed. Results: Fourteen eyes of 13 patients were confirmed to have retinal vasculitis by review of imaging studies. All cases occurred after the first pegcetacoplan injection. Occlusive retinal vasculopathy was confirmed in 11 eyes (79%). Patients presented a median of 10.5 days (range, 8-23 days) after pegcetacoplan injection. All eyes had anterior chamber inflammation, and 12 eyes (86%) had vitritis. Vasculopathy involved retinal veins (100%) more than arteries (73%), and 12 eyes (86%) had retinal hemorrhages. The median visual acuity (VA) was 20/60 (range, 20/30-5/200) at baseline, 20/300 (range, 20/100-no light perception [NLP]) at vasculitis presentation, and 20/200 (range 20/70-NLP) at the last follow-up. Eight eyes (57%) had more than a 3-line decrease in VA, and 6 eyes (43%) had more than a 6-line decrease in VA from baseline to the final follow-up, including 2 eyes that were enucleated. Six eyes (43%) developed signs of anterior segment neovascularization. Conclusions: There is currently no known etiology for vasculitis in this series. Optimum treatment strategies remain unknown. Infectious etiologies should be considered, and corticosteroid treatments may hasten resolution of inflammatory findings. Continued treatment of affected patients with pegcetacoplan should be avoided.","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264231220224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze post-marketing cases of retinal vasculitis after intravitreal pegcetacoplan. Methods: The American Society of Retina Specialists (ASRS) Research and Safety in Therapeutics (ReST) Committee as well as an expert panel performed a retrospective review of cases of retinal vasculitis reported to the ASRS. Clinical and imaging characteristics were reviewed for evidence of retinal vasculitis and analyzed. Results: Fourteen eyes of 13 patients were confirmed to have retinal vasculitis by review of imaging studies. All cases occurred after the first pegcetacoplan injection. Occlusive retinal vasculopathy was confirmed in 11 eyes (79%). Patients presented a median of 10.5 days (range, 8-23 days) after pegcetacoplan injection. All eyes had anterior chamber inflammation, and 12 eyes (86%) had vitritis. Vasculopathy involved retinal veins (100%) more than arteries (73%), and 12 eyes (86%) had retinal hemorrhages. The median visual acuity (VA) was 20/60 (range, 20/30-5/200) at baseline, 20/300 (range, 20/100-no light perception [NLP]) at vasculitis presentation, and 20/200 (range 20/70-NLP) at the last follow-up. Eight eyes (57%) had more than a 3-line decrease in VA, and 6 eyes (43%) had more than a 6-line decrease in VA from baseline to the final follow-up, including 2 eyes that were enucleated. Six eyes (43%) developed signs of anterior segment neovascularization. Conclusions: There is currently no known etiology for vasculitis in this series. Optimum treatment strategies remain unknown. Infectious etiologies should be considered, and corticosteroid treatments may hasten resolution of inflammatory findings. Continued treatment of affected patients with pegcetacoplan should be avoided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玻璃体内注射 Pegcetacoplan 后的视网膜血管炎:ASRS 治疗研究与安全(ReST)委员会的报告
目的:分析玻璃体内使用培高氯普兰后出现视网膜血管炎的上市后病例。方法:美国视网膜专科医师协会(ASRS)治疗研究与安全委员会(ASRS Research and Safety in Therapeututures)对上市后的视网膜血管炎病例进行分析:美国视网膜专科医师协会(ASRS)治疗研究与安全委员会(ReST)以及一个专家小组对向 ASRS 报告的视网膜血管炎病例进行了回顾性审查。对视网膜血管炎的临床和影像学特征进行了审查和分析。结果:通过影像学检查,13 名患者的 14 只眼睛被证实患有视网膜血管炎。所有病例均发生在首次注射培加氯普兰之后。11只眼睛(79%)确诊为闭塞性视网膜血管病变。患者在注射培加氯普兰后的中位数为 10.5 天(8-23 天)。所有眼睛都有前房炎症,12 只眼睛(86%)有玻璃体炎。血管病变涉及视网膜静脉(100%)多于动脉(73%),12 只眼睛(86%)有视网膜出血。基线视力(VA)中位数为 20/60(范围为 20/30-5/200),脉管炎发生时为 20/300(范围为 20/100-无光感 [NLP]),最后一次随访时为 20/200(范围为 20/70-NLP)。从基线到最后一次随访,8 只眼睛(57%)的视力下降超过 3 线,6 只眼睛(43%)的视力下降超过 6 线,其中 2 只眼睛被摘除眼球。6只眼睛(43%)出现了前段新生血管的迹象。结论:该系列病例中的血管炎目前尚无已知病因。最佳治疗策略仍然未知。应考虑感染病因,皮质类固醇治疗可加快炎症症状的缓解。应避免继续使用培高康治疗受影响的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the Editor-in-Chief. Update on Retinal Drug Safety: Proceedings of the ASRS ReST Committee Webinar Part 1. Extended Intraocular Drug-Delivery Platforms for the Treatment of Retinal and Choroidal Diseases. Successful Treatment of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion With Tissue Plasminogen Activator Followed by Recurrent Retinal Ischemia 2024 Distinguished Contributor Awards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1