Validation of the Malay version of Food Insecurity Experience Scale (M-FIES) using Rasch analysis

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Malaysian Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.31246/mjn-2022-0031
Roselawati Mat Ya, Noraishah Mohamed Nor, N. Jaafar, S. Sidek, Jamalludin Ab Rahman, Norhasmah Sulaiman, Wan Azdie Mohd Abu Bakar
{"title":"Validation of the Malay version of Food Insecurity Experience Scale (M-FIES) using Rasch analysis","authors":"Roselawati Mat Ya, Noraishah Mohamed Nor, N. Jaafar, S. Sidek, Jamalludin Ab Rahman, Norhasmah Sulaiman, Wan Azdie Mohd Abu Bakar","doi":"10.31246/mjn-2022-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Food security can be defined as the availability of and accessibility to food, acquired in an acceptable means at any given time and place in a way that could maintain health and wellbeing. One critical dimension of food security is continued access to adequate food. To measure this dimension, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) developed the latest measurement tool, namely the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), the first instrument to measure people who experience food insecurity globally. This study aimed to validate the construct validity and reliability of the Malay version of FIES (M-FIES) for Malaysians. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 145 households in Kuantan, Pahang. Rasch analysis was used to analyse the construct validity of FIES. Results: FIES met the Rasch model assumptions with all items having an infit value of between 0.7- 1.3 and an outfit value of <2.0. The item and person reliability were 0.97 and 0.71, respectively; while the item and person separation were 5.59 and 1.58, respectively. The FIES item severity indicated that the items “few food”, “healthy”, “skipped”, “ate less”, and “runout” were disordered. Conclusion: The M-FIES is a valid and reliable measurement tool for the food insecurity situation among households based on its construct validity assessed using the Rasch model. Furthermore, the severity of item in M-FIES was different in terms of order from the original FIES, suggesting that the same items may be interpreted differently due to cultural or societal differences.","PeriodicalId":18207,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Nutrition","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31246/mjn-2022-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Food security can be defined as the availability of and accessibility to food, acquired in an acceptable means at any given time and place in a way that could maintain health and wellbeing. One critical dimension of food security is continued access to adequate food. To measure this dimension, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) developed the latest measurement tool, namely the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), the first instrument to measure people who experience food insecurity globally. This study aimed to validate the construct validity and reliability of the Malay version of FIES (M-FIES) for Malaysians. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 145 households in Kuantan, Pahang. Rasch analysis was used to analyse the construct validity of FIES. Results: FIES met the Rasch model assumptions with all items having an infit value of between 0.7- 1.3 and an outfit value of <2.0. The item and person reliability were 0.97 and 0.71, respectively; while the item and person separation were 5.59 and 1.58, respectively. The FIES item severity indicated that the items “few food”, “healthy”, “skipped”, “ate less”, and “runout” were disordered. Conclusion: The M-FIES is a valid and reliable measurement tool for the food insecurity situation among households based on its construct validity assessed using the Rasch model. Furthermore, the severity of item in M-FIES was different in terms of order from the original FIES, suggesting that the same items may be interpreted differently due to cultural or societal differences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 Rasch 分析法验证马来语版食物不安全体验量表(M-FIES)
导言:粮食安全可定义为在任何特定时间和地点,以可接受的方式获得食物,从而保持健康和福祉。粮食安全的一个重要方面是持续获得充足的食物。为测量这一维度,联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)开发了最新的测量工具,即 "粮食不安全体验量表"(FIES),这是首个测量全球粮食不安全体验者的工具。本研究旨在验证马来语版 FIES(M-FIES)在马来西亚人中的构建有效性和可靠性。研究方法:这项横断面研究在彭亨州关丹市的 145 个家庭中进行。研究采用 Rasch 分析法来分析 FIES 的建构效度。结果:FIES 符合 Rasch 模型:FIES 符合 Rasch 模型假设,所有项目的 infit 值均在 0.7-1.3 之间,outfit 值小于 2.0。项目和人的信度分别为 0.97 和 0.71,项目和人的分离度分别为 5.59 和 1.58。FIES 项目严重性表明,"食物少"、"健康"、"不吃"、"吃得少 "和 "吃不完 "等项目是紊乱的。结论根据 Rasch 模型评估的建构效度,M-FIES 是衡量家庭食物不安全状况的有效、可靠的工具。此外,M-FIES 中项目的严重程度在顺序上与原始 FIES 有所不同,这表明由于文化或社会差异,相同的项目可能会有不同的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition
Malaysian Journal of Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Effect of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25(OH) D levels and blood pressure among the elderly in a nursing house: A double-blind, randomised placebocontrolled trial Plasma amino acid profiles in thalassaemia major with iron overload Factors affecting stunting in children aged 6-23 months in South Sumatra Province, Indonesia Infant feeding practices and associated factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from an online crosssectional study in Indonesia Predictors for 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in early pregnancy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1