Evaluation of the efficacy of three medical device detergents on bacteria and yeast derived biofilm: a comparative study

Kuenyoul Park, Mi-Na Kim, H. Sung
{"title":"Evaluation of the efficacy of three medical device detergents on bacteria and yeast derived biofilm: a comparative study","authors":"Kuenyoul Park, Mi-Na Kim, H. Sung","doi":"10.5145/acm.2023.26.4.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three medical detergents against bacteria and yeast-derived biofilms. Methods: The biofilm removal efficacy of EmpowerTM (Metrex, USA), CidezymeTM (Johnson and Johnson Medical Inc, USA), and Matrix mintTM (Whiteley Medical, Australia) were compared to that of chlorine bleach. Biofilms were produced using Staphylococcus aureus RN9120, Escherichia coli ATCC35218, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853, Candida albicans ATCC14053, and clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Candida auris, and Trichosporon asahii. The organisms were suspended in tryptic soy broth (TSB) in 96-well microplates and cultured for 72 hours. They were treated with the detergents, and the residual biofilm mass was quantified using crystal violet staining followed by optical density measurements at 620 nm (OD620 ). Results: EmpowerTM and CidezymeTM significantly reduced the biofilm mass derived from all species by > 50% of OD620 at 37ºC except those from E. faecalis, T. asahii, and C. auris. Matrix mintTM had no effect on the biofilms under any condition. Conclusion: The culture conditions and the species of the biofilm-producing organism influenced the effectiveness of the detergent. Biofilms produced by E. faecalis, C. auris, and T. asahii were resistant to all detergent treatments under all conditions.","PeriodicalId":34065,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"127 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/acm.2023.26.4.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of three medical detergents against bacteria and yeast-derived biofilms. Methods: The biofilm removal efficacy of EmpowerTM (Metrex, USA), CidezymeTM (Johnson and Johnson Medical Inc, USA), and Matrix mintTM (Whiteley Medical, Australia) were compared to that of chlorine bleach. Biofilms were produced using Staphylococcus aureus RN9120, Escherichia coli ATCC35218, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853, Candida albicans ATCC14053, and clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis, E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Candida auris, and Trichosporon asahii. The organisms were suspended in tryptic soy broth (TSB) in 96-well microplates and cultured for 72 hours. They were treated with the detergents, and the residual biofilm mass was quantified using crystal violet staining followed by optical density measurements at 620 nm (OD620 ). Results: EmpowerTM and CidezymeTM significantly reduced the biofilm mass derived from all species by > 50% of OD620 at 37ºC except those from E. faecalis, T. asahii, and C. auris. Matrix mintTM had no effect on the biofilms under any condition. Conclusion: The culture conditions and the species of the biofilm-producing organism influenced the effectiveness of the detergent. Biofilms produced by E. faecalis, C. auris, and T. asahii were resistant to all detergent treatments under all conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估三种医疗器械清洁剂对细菌和酵母衍生生物膜的功效:一项比较研究
背景:本研究旨在评估三种医用清洁剂对细菌和酵母衍生生物膜的功效。将 EmpowerTM(Metrex,美国)、CidezymeTM(强生医疗公司,美国)和 Matrix mintTM(Whiteley Medical,澳大利亚)的生物膜去除效果与氯漂白剂进行比较。使用金黄色葡萄球菌 RN9120、大肠埃希菌 ATCC35218、铜绿假单胞菌 ATCC27853、白色念珠菌 ATCC14053 以及临床分离的粪肠球菌、大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、白色念珠菌和旭日三孢子菌产生生物膜。将这些生物悬浮在 96 孔微孔板中的胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤(TSB)中,培养 72 小时。用去污剂处理后,用水晶紫染色,然后在 620 纳米波长下测量光密度(OD620),对残留的生物膜质量进行量化。结果:在 37ºC 温度下,EmpowerTM 和 CidezymeTM 能显著减少所有菌种的生物膜质量,OD620 值减少 50%以上,但粪大肠杆菌、痢疾杆菌和肛门脓疱疮杆菌的生物膜除外。Matrix mintTM 在任何条件下对生物膜都没有影响。结论培养条件和产生生物膜的生物种类会影响洗涤剂的效果。在所有条件下,粪肠球菌、肛门脓疱病菌和痢疾杆菌产生的生物膜对所有洗涤剂处理都有抗性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Emergence of Vanrija humicola as a pathogen of urinary tract infections in Korea ACM’s transition to an English journal: A leap towards international recognition Screening for potential infections in fecal microbiota transplantation guidelines and an experience of microbiota bank operation in Korea: a narrative review Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides dif f icile infection: guidelines and status of practice in Korea Taenia saginata infection incidentally detected during workup for lymphoma from an 8-year-old boy in Korea: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1