Effectiveness of buffered acetylsalicylic acid compared to other drugs in diseases patients in clinical practice: results of the CARDINAL observational retrospective study

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) drugs for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in clinical practice and compare the effectiveness of the Cardiomagnyl with other ASA drugs.Material and methods. This observational, non-interventional, retrospective study included data from electronic medical records of 18199 patients with ASCVD who were divided into 2 following groups: patients who received ASA 75-100 mg (n=9784) and patients who did not receive ASA (n=8325). The prescription rate of ASA, the choice of the first drug, the duration of ASA therapy, the frequency of switching ASA during treatment, and the choice of the second ASA drug when changing therapy were assessed. Due to the heterogeneity of patients in the above groups, to assess the clinical outcomes, propensity score matching was performed and comparable groups were selected to evaluate the effectiveness of ASA drugs 75-100 mg in patients with ASCVD (n= 427) in comparison with patients not receiving ASA (n=427) and to assess the effectiveness of Cardiomagnyl 75 mg (n=1308) in comparison with enterosoluble ASA 100 mg (CRA) (n=1308) taking into account 24 parameters.Results. The average proportion of patients with ASCVD taking ASA drugs was 58%. During treatment, 54% of patients underwent a change in drug therapy from one ASA drug to another. The prescription rate of Cardiomagnyl as a first-choice drug was 33%, and as a second drug when changing therapy — 21%. The duration of Cardiomagnyl therapy was the longest compared to other ASA drugs and amounted to 16,3 months. The incidence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and major adverse cardiovascular events in the group of patients who received ACS 75-100 mg was significantly lower than in patients who did not take ASA drugs and amounted to 4,7% vs 8,7%, 0,9% vs 3,3%, 5,6% vs 11,9%, respectively. Significantly lower incidence of unstable angina (0,8% vs 2,0%), myocardial infarction (1,5% vs 3,9%) and major adverse cardiovascular events (5,4% vs 7,8%) in group of patients who received Cardiomagnyl 75 mg as opposed to enterosoluble ASA.Conclusion. Significant advantages of buffered ASA (Cardiomagnyl) were revealed in comparison with enterosoluble ASA in clinical practice.