Cost-benefit analysis of solar energy integration in buildings: a case study of affordable housing in Brazil

IF 2.2 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Frontiers in Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1255845
Roberto Nonato De Arruda, Karoline V. Figueiredo, Diego A. Vasco, A. Haddad, Mohammad K. Najjar
{"title":"Cost-benefit analysis of solar energy integration in buildings: a case study of affordable housing in Brazil","authors":"Roberto Nonato De Arruda, Karoline V. Figueiredo, Diego A. Vasco, A. Haddad, Mohammad K. Najjar","doi":"10.3389/fbuil.2023.1255845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The construction sector plays a pivotal role in global natural resource consumption, underscoring the urgency of promoting energy efficiency in buildings. With the escalating demand for renewable energy, solar power has gained significant traction. This study focuses on conducting a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of solar energy integration in residential buildings.Methods: The approach involves a novel comparison between photovoltaic panels and Solar Heating Systems (SHS) based on both environmental and financial considerations. To evaluate the practical implications, a case study was undertaken on an affordable housing complex in Brazil. Three distinct models were simulated for analysis: Model 1, featuring a grid-connected photovoltaic project with zero energy balance; Model 2, incorporating a grid-connected photovoltaic project with two solar panels generating 340 W each; and Model 3, integrating an SHS.Results: The findings reveal the technical and economic feasibility of all proposed models. Model 1 stands out with superior performance in terms of estimated energy generation, energy savings, and annual reduction of CO2 emissions. On the other hand, Model 3 excels in the financial analysis, indicating its viability from a cost perspective.Discussion: This research contributes to informed decision-making processes regarding the utilization of photovoltaic panels and SHS, thereby fostering energy efficiency and sustainability in buildings. The nuanced comparison of environmental and financial aspects provides valuable insights for stakeholders in the construction and renewable energy sectors. The identified strengths and trade-offs of each model enable a more holistic understanding of the implications of solar energy integration in residential buildings.","PeriodicalId":37112,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Built Environment","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1255845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The construction sector plays a pivotal role in global natural resource consumption, underscoring the urgency of promoting energy efficiency in buildings. With the escalating demand for renewable energy, solar power has gained significant traction. This study focuses on conducting a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of solar energy integration in residential buildings.Methods: The approach involves a novel comparison between photovoltaic panels and Solar Heating Systems (SHS) based on both environmental and financial considerations. To evaluate the practical implications, a case study was undertaken on an affordable housing complex in Brazil. Three distinct models were simulated for analysis: Model 1, featuring a grid-connected photovoltaic project with zero energy balance; Model 2, incorporating a grid-connected photovoltaic project with two solar panels generating 340 W each; and Model 3, integrating an SHS.Results: The findings reveal the technical and economic feasibility of all proposed models. Model 1 stands out with superior performance in terms of estimated energy generation, energy savings, and annual reduction of CO2 emissions. On the other hand, Model 3 excels in the financial analysis, indicating its viability from a cost perspective.Discussion: This research contributes to informed decision-making processes regarding the utilization of photovoltaic panels and SHS, thereby fostering energy efficiency and sustainability in buildings. The nuanced comparison of environmental and financial aspects provides valuable insights for stakeholders in the construction and renewable energy sectors. The identified strengths and trade-offs of each model enable a more holistic understanding of the implications of solar energy integration in residential buildings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑物太阳能集成的成本效益分析:巴西经济适用房案例研究
导言:建筑行业在全球自然资源消耗中起着举足轻重的作用,这凸显了提高建筑能效的紧迫性。随着对可再生能源需求的不断增长,太阳能发电已获得了显著的发展。本研究的重点是对住宅建筑太阳能一体化进行全面的成本效益分析:方法:该方法基于环境和财务两方面的考虑,对光电板和太阳能供热系统(SHS)进行了新颖的比较。为了评估实际影响,对巴西的一个经济适用房建筑群进行了案例研究。模拟了三种不同的模式进行分析:模型 1:采用零能量平衡的并网光伏项目;模型 2:采用两个太阳能电池板并网光伏项目,每个太阳能电池板的发电量为 340 瓦;模型 3:采用太阳能热水器:结果:研究结果表明,所有建议的模式在技术和经济上都是可行的。结果:研究结果表明,所有建议模式在技术和经济上都是可行的。模式 1 在预计发电量、节能和每年减少的二氧化碳排放量方面表现突出。另一方面,模型 3 在财务分析方面表现突出,表明其从成本角度来看是可行的:本研究有助于就光伏电池板和太阳能热水器的使用做出明智的决策,从而提高建筑物的能效和可持续性。环境和财务方面的细微比较为建筑和可再生能源领域的利益相关者提供了宝贵的见解。通过对每种模式的优势和权衡,可以更全面地了解住宅建筑中太阳能集成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Built Environment
Frontiers in Built Environment Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
266
期刊最新文献
A case study on the implementation of location tracking technologies for productivity monitoring: understanding workers’ acceptance and socio-technical implications A computational approach for categorizing street segments in urban street networks based on topological properties Ground response of rolling dynamic compaction—a finite element modelling approach Adapting to climate change: snow load assessment of snow galleries on the Iron Ore Line in Northern Sweden Combination of cellulose nanofiber and artificial fusion protein for biocementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1