Leucovorin Dosing for Gastrointestinal Cancer

Khai Tran, Melissa Walter
{"title":"Leucovorin Dosing for Gastrointestinal Cancer","authors":"Khai Tran, Melissa Walter","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2023.805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Issue? \n \nSince 2008, the shortage of leucovorin has had a significant impact on fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Many institutions worldwide provided possible options to relieve the leucovorin shortage, including using treatment without leucovorin, lowering the standard leucovorin dose, or using alternative drugs. \nIf lowering the body surface area-adjusted standard dose of leucovorin does not affect efficacy and safety, then implementation of a low flat-dose protocol may prevent mistakes that result during dose calculation and save pharmacy compounding time and costs. \nDecision-makers want to know if any clinical evidence supports a low flat-dose protocol for leucovorin. \n \nWhat Did We Do? \n \nTo inform decisions about using flat-dose leucovorin in conjunction with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, CADTH sought to identify and summarize literature comparing the clinical effectiveness of flat dosing versus weight-based leucovorin dosing. We also attempted to identify evidence-based recommendations for leucovorin dosing for colorectal or upper gastrointestinal cancer. \nA research information specialist conducted a literature search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature with a search strategy focused on leucovorin, dosing, and colorectal or gastrointestinal cancers. The search was limited to English-language documents published since 2013. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings. \n \nWhat Did We Find? \n \nWe found 1 small retrospective cohort study (58 patients) comparing low flat-dose 50 mg leucovorin with body surface area-adjusted to high dose 200 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer. The study found no statistically significant differences between the 2 doses in survival or complication rates. \nWe found no evidence-based guidelines regarding leucovorin dosing for colorectal or upper gastrointestinal cancer. However, we found several guidelines with unclear methodology reporting leucovorin doses used in different fluorouracil-based regimens. \n \nWhat Does it Mean? \n \nLimited evidence from this review suggests that the standard weight-based dosing of leucovorin may be reduced to a low flat-dose. However, we require a larger and well conducted trial to confirm the findings of that study. \nDecision-makers may wish to consider that reducing the dose of leucovorin may conserve the supply, reduce pharmacy compounding time and control acquisition costs. \n","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"65 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2023.805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What Is the Issue? Since 2008, the shortage of leucovorin has had a significant impact on fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Many institutions worldwide provided possible options to relieve the leucovorin shortage, including using treatment without leucovorin, lowering the standard leucovorin dose, or using alternative drugs. If lowering the body surface area-adjusted standard dose of leucovorin does not affect efficacy and safety, then implementation of a low flat-dose protocol may prevent mistakes that result during dose calculation and save pharmacy compounding time and costs. Decision-makers want to know if any clinical evidence supports a low flat-dose protocol for leucovorin. What Did We Do? To inform decisions about using flat-dose leucovorin in conjunction with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, CADTH sought to identify and summarize literature comparing the clinical effectiveness of flat dosing versus weight-based leucovorin dosing. We also attempted to identify evidence-based recommendations for leucovorin dosing for colorectal or upper gastrointestinal cancer. A research information specialist conducted a literature search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature with a search strategy focused on leucovorin, dosing, and colorectal or gastrointestinal cancers. The search was limited to English-language documents published since 2013. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings. What Did We Find? We found 1 small retrospective cohort study (58 patients) comparing low flat-dose 50 mg leucovorin with body surface area-adjusted to high dose 200 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 leucovorin in patients with colorectal cancer. The study found no statistically significant differences between the 2 doses in survival or complication rates. We found no evidence-based guidelines regarding leucovorin dosing for colorectal or upper gastrointestinal cancer. However, we found several guidelines with unclear methodology reporting leucovorin doses used in different fluorouracil-based regimens. What Does it Mean? Limited evidence from this review suggests that the standard weight-based dosing of leucovorin may be reduced to a low flat-dose. However, we require a larger and well conducted trial to confirm the findings of that study. Decision-makers may wish to consider that reducing the dose of leucovorin may conserve the supply, reduce pharmacy compounding time and control acquisition costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗胃肠道癌症的亮菌甲素剂量
问题出在哪里? 自 2008 年以来,亮菌甲素的短缺对以氟尿嘧啶为基础的化疗产生了重大影响。全球许多机构提供了缓解亮菌甲素短缺的可行方案,包括使用不含亮菌甲素的治疗方法、降低亮菌甲素的标准剂量或使用替代药物。如果降低亮菌甲素的体表面积调整标准剂量不会影响疗效和安全性,那么实施低平剂量方案可以避免剂量计算过程中出现错误,并节省药房复方制剂的时间和成本。决策者想知道是否有临床证据支持亮菌甲素的低平剂量方案。 我们做了什么? 为了为在氟尿嘧啶类化疗中使用平剂量亮菌甲素提供决策依据,CADTH 试图找出并总结比较平剂量与基于体重的亮菌甲素剂量临床有效性的文献。我们还试图为结肠直肠癌或上消化道癌的亮菌甲素剂量确定循证建议。一位研究信息专家对同行评议文献和灰色文献进行了文献检索,检索策略侧重于亮菌甲素、剂量、结直肠癌或胃肠道癌症。检索仅限于 2013 年以来发表的英文文献。一位审稿人根据预先确定的标准筛选纳入文章,对纳入的研究进行严格评估,并对研究结果进行叙述性总结。 我们发现了什么? 我们发现了一项小型回顾性队列研究(58 例患者),该研究比较了结直肠癌患者中低平剂量 50 毫克亮菌甲素与体表面积调整后的高剂量 200 毫克/平方米至 500 毫克/平方米亮菌甲素。研究发现,两种剂量在生存率或并发症发生率方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异。我们没有找到有关结直肠癌或上消化道癌亮菌甲素剂量的循证指南。不过,我们发现了一些方法不明确的指南,报告了不同氟尿嘧啶治疗方案中使用的亮菌甲素剂量。 这意味着什么? 本综述中的有限证据表明,基于体重的亮菌甲素标准剂量可减少为低平剂量。然而,我们需要一项规模更大、实施更完善的试验来证实该研究的结果。决策者不妨考虑减少亮菌甲素的剂量可以节约供应、减少药房配制时间并控制采购成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relugolix (Orgovyx) Nabilone for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus in Canada 2023 Abstracts of the Canadian Association for Population Therapeutics The Development of a Model Validation Tool to Assist in the Conduct of Economic Evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1