Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Individuals Younger Than 50 Years

Sara D. Khangura, Carolyn Spry
{"title":"Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Individuals Younger Than 50 Years","authors":"Sara D. Khangura, Carolyn Spry","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2023.808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Issue? \n \nIncidence of colorectal cancer in individuals younger than 50 years in Canada is rising, despite existing recommendations in Canada advising that colorectal cancer screening be initiated at 50 years. \nIn response to the also increasing incidence of colorectal cancer observed in other jurisdictions, screening for colorectal cancer in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years has been recommended. \nThese factors have prompted reconsideration of current Canadian guidelines regarding the age at which colorectal cancer screening should be initiated. \n \nWhat Did We Do? \n \nTo inform considerations about the age at which colorectal cancer screening should best be initiated, CADTH identified and summarized studies comparing colorectal cancer screening in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years with either no screening or screening in individuals of average risk aged 50 years and older. \nAn information specialist conducted a search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources. Recommendations from evidence-based guidelines for screening individuals of average risk younger than 50 years were also sought and summarized. \n \nWhat Did We Find? \n \nData from 1 retrospective cohort study in the US conducted in a large sample across 13 years suggested there is higher incidence of colorectal cancer among individuals between the ages of 45 and 49 years who underwent screening colonoscopy than in those between the ages of 50 and 54 years. \nData from a retrospective cohort study conducted in Greece with a limited sample size across 1 year of observation demonstrated no difference in the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years or 50 years and older. \nEstimates from 4 modelling studies (1 of which was Canadian) that investigated screening in individuals younger than 50 years indicate that life-years may be gained, colorectal cancer cases and deaths may be reduced, but that numbers of lifetime colonoscopies and complications from screening would likely increase. \nOne economic evaluation conducted in Portugal concluded that there is no cost-utility for colorectal cancer screening in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €39,760, given current estimates of incidence in this age cohort. \nSeven evidence-based guidelines identified recommend that colorectal cancer screening be initiated in individuals of average risk at age 45 years, whereas 1 guideline recommends against screening in individuals of average risk beginning at 45 years and 1 guideline recommends against screening beginning at age 40 years. Most evidence-based guidelines highlight the lack of empirical evidence describing clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness as limitations when developing recommendations. \n \nWhat Does It Mean? \n \nEmpirical data describing the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years remain limited, although a preponderance of evidence-based guidelines identified by this review recommend in favour of doing so. \nModelled data estimate that colorectal cancer screening in individuals younger than 50 years may produce benefits, although these estimates are vulnerable to model inputs and assumptions (perfect adherence to screening protocols, for instance), and may not adequately account for the potential harms of screening. \nAdditional opportunities for maximizing the benefits of colorectal cancer screening may include targeting increased uptake among disadvantaged and high-risk groups, including those 50 years and older. \nBroader considerations that address societal benefit and costs — including health equity and implementation — are essential to inform decision-making concerning colorectal cancer screening in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years. \n","PeriodicalId":9437,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"108 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2023.808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What Is the Issue? Incidence of colorectal cancer in individuals younger than 50 years in Canada is rising, despite existing recommendations in Canada advising that colorectal cancer screening be initiated at 50 years. In response to the also increasing incidence of colorectal cancer observed in other jurisdictions, screening for colorectal cancer in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years has been recommended. These factors have prompted reconsideration of current Canadian guidelines regarding the age at which colorectal cancer screening should be initiated. What Did We Do? To inform considerations about the age at which colorectal cancer screening should best be initiated, CADTH identified and summarized studies comparing colorectal cancer screening in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years with either no screening or screening in individuals of average risk aged 50 years and older. An information specialist conducted a search of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources. Recommendations from evidence-based guidelines for screening individuals of average risk younger than 50 years were also sought and summarized. What Did We Find? Data from 1 retrospective cohort study in the US conducted in a large sample across 13 years suggested there is higher incidence of colorectal cancer among individuals between the ages of 45 and 49 years who underwent screening colonoscopy than in those between the ages of 50 and 54 years. Data from a retrospective cohort study conducted in Greece with a limited sample size across 1 year of observation demonstrated no difference in the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years or 50 years and older. Estimates from 4 modelling studies (1 of which was Canadian) that investigated screening in individuals younger than 50 years indicate that life-years may be gained, colorectal cancer cases and deaths may be reduced, but that numbers of lifetime colonoscopies and complications from screening would likely increase. One economic evaluation conducted in Portugal concluded that there is no cost-utility for colorectal cancer screening in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €39,760, given current estimates of incidence in this age cohort. Seven evidence-based guidelines identified recommend that colorectal cancer screening be initiated in individuals of average risk at age 45 years, whereas 1 guideline recommends against screening in individuals of average risk beginning at 45 years and 1 guideline recommends against screening beginning at age 40 years. Most evidence-based guidelines highlight the lack of empirical evidence describing clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness as limitations when developing recommendations. What Does It Mean? Empirical data describing the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years remain limited, although a preponderance of evidence-based guidelines identified by this review recommend in favour of doing so. Modelled data estimate that colorectal cancer screening in individuals younger than 50 years may produce benefits, although these estimates are vulnerable to model inputs and assumptions (perfect adherence to screening protocols, for instance), and may not adequately account for the potential harms of screening. Additional opportunities for maximizing the benefits of colorectal cancer screening may include targeting increased uptake among disadvantaged and high-risk groups, including those 50 years and older. Broader considerations that address societal benefit and costs — including health equity and implementation — are essential to inform decision-making concerning colorectal cancer screening in individuals of average risk younger than 50 years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
50 岁以下人群的大肠癌筛查
问题是什么? 尽管加拿大建议 50 岁以下人群开始进行结直肠癌筛查,但加拿大 50 岁以下人群的结直肠癌发病率仍在上升。鉴于其他辖区的结直肠癌发病率也在上升,建议对 50 岁以下的平均风险人群进行结直肠癌筛查。这些因素促使人们重新考虑加拿大关于开始进行结直肠癌筛查的年龄的现行指南。 我们做了什么? 为了对开始进行结直肠癌筛查的最佳年龄进行考虑,CADTH 确定并总结了对平均风险低于 50 岁的人进行结直肠癌筛查与不进行筛查或对平均风险在 50 岁及以上的人进行筛查进行比较的研究。一位信息专家对同行评审和灰色文献资料进行了搜索。此外,还搜索并总结了循证指南中关于对 50 岁以下平均风险人群进行筛查的建议。 我们发现了什么? 美国一项回顾性队列研究的数据显示,在接受结肠镜筛查的 45 至 49 岁人群中,结肠直肠癌的发病率高于 50 至 54 岁人群。一项在希腊进行的回顾性队列研究的数据显示,50 岁以下或 50 岁及以上的平均风险人群的结直肠癌累积发病率没有差异。对 50 岁以下人群进行筛查的 4 项模拟研究(其中 1 项为加拿大研究)的估计结果表明,可能会增加寿命年数,减少结直肠癌病例和死亡人数,但终生结肠镜检查次数和筛查并发症可能会增加。在葡萄牙进行的一项经济评估得出结论,鉴于目前对 50 岁以下人群发病率的估计,在 39,760 欧元的支付意愿阈值下,对 50 岁以下的平均风险人群进行结直肠癌筛查没有成本效用。有 7 份循证指南建议在 45 岁时对一般风险人群进行结直肠癌筛查,1 份指南建议不要在 45 岁时对一般风险人群进行筛查,1 份指南建议不要在 40 岁时进行筛查。大多数循证指南都强调,在制定建议时,缺乏描述临床有效性和成本效益的实证证据是限制因素。 这意味着什么? 尽管本综述中发现的大多数循证指南都建议对 50 岁以下的平均风险人群进行结直肠癌筛查,但描述其有效性的实证数据仍然有限。根据模型数据估计,对 50 岁以下人群进行结直肠癌筛查可能会产生益处,但这些估计值容易受到模型输入和假设(例如完全遵守筛查方案)的影响,而且可能没有充分考虑到筛查的潜在危害。使结直肠癌筛查效益最大化的其他机会可能包括针对弱势群体和高危人群(包括 50 岁及以上人群)提高筛查率。解决社会效益和成本的更广泛考虑因素--包括健康公平和实施--对于为 50 岁以下平均风险人群的结直肠癌筛查决策提供信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relugolix (Orgovyx) Nabilone for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus in Canada 2023 Abstracts of the Canadian Association for Population Therapeutics The Development of a Model Validation Tool to Assist in the Conduct of Economic Evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1