{"title":"Structural evolution of the North Himalaya domes as revealed by crustal-scale seismic-reflection surveying","authors":"Zhuoxuan Shi, Rui Gao, Zhanwu Lu, Wenhui Li, Hongqiang Li, Hongda Liang, Rui Qi, Xiao‐Fan Deng, Xinyu Dong","doi":"10.1130/b37042.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the typical products of collisional orogeny, gneiss domes are important geological units with which to decipher the crustal deformation and evolutionary history of continental collision. However, their formation mechanisms remain poorly understood. This issue is well illustrated by the debate surrounding the origin of the North Himalaya gneiss dome zone, which has been attributed to middle-crustal channel flow, thrust-duplex development, extensional detachment faulting, or diapiric flow related to partial crustal melting. These models predict different internal structures within individual domes that can be tested by high-resolution seismic imaging. Here, we present newly acquired seismic-reflection data collected along an ∼120-km-long north-south traverse across the central segment of the North Himalaya gneiss dome zone. Analysis and interpretation of the seismic data constrained by surface geology observations imply that (1) the subducting Indian lower crust is decoupled from the deformed middle and upper crust in the North Himalaya, (2) a crustal-scale stack of antiformal duplexes with a structural thickness of ∼35 km defines the cores of the gneiss domes imaged by the seismic survey, and (3) highly reflective, sheetlike bodies imaged in our seismic profile are best interpreted as leucocratic intrusions developed synchronously during gneiss dome development. As a whole, our work suggests that the North Himalaya gneiss dome zone was created by coeval crustal shortening and partial melting of orogenic crust.","PeriodicalId":55104,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","volume":"11 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/b37042.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As the typical products of collisional orogeny, gneiss domes are important geological units with which to decipher the crustal deformation and evolutionary history of continental collision. However, their formation mechanisms remain poorly understood. This issue is well illustrated by the debate surrounding the origin of the North Himalaya gneiss dome zone, which has been attributed to middle-crustal channel flow, thrust-duplex development, extensional detachment faulting, or diapiric flow related to partial crustal melting. These models predict different internal structures within individual domes that can be tested by high-resolution seismic imaging. Here, we present newly acquired seismic-reflection data collected along an ∼120-km-long north-south traverse across the central segment of the North Himalaya gneiss dome zone. Analysis and interpretation of the seismic data constrained by surface geology observations imply that (1) the subducting Indian lower crust is decoupled from the deformed middle and upper crust in the North Himalaya, (2) a crustal-scale stack of antiformal duplexes with a structural thickness of ∼35 km defines the cores of the gneiss domes imaged by the seismic survey, and (3) highly reflective, sheetlike bodies imaged in our seismic profile are best interpreted as leucocratic intrusions developed synchronously during gneiss dome development. As a whole, our work suggests that the North Himalaya gneiss dome zone was created by coeval crustal shortening and partial melting of orogenic crust.
期刊介绍:
The GSA Bulletin is the Society''s premier scholarly journal, published continuously since 1890. Its first editor was William John (WJ) McGee, who was responsible for establishing much of its original style and format. Fully refereed, each bimonthly issue includes 16-20 papers focusing on the most definitive, timely, and classic-style research in all earth-science disciplines. The Bulletin welcomes most contributions that are data-rich, mature studies of broad interest (i.e., of interest to more than one sub-discipline of earth science) and of lasting, archival quality. These include (but are not limited to) studies related to tectonics, structural geology, geochemistry, geophysics, hydrogeology, marine geology, paleoclimatology, planetary geology, quaternary geology/geomorphology, sedimentary geology, stratigraphy, and volcanology. The journal is committed to further developing both the scope of its content and its international profile so that it publishes the most current earth science research that will be of wide interest to geoscientists.