Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN): a retrospective study on neoplastic risk after 5 years surveillance

M. Bachand, Mohamed-Anas Chennouf, Mandy Malick, Annie Beaudoin
{"title":"Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN): a retrospective study on neoplastic risk after 5 years surveillance","authors":"M. Bachand, Mohamed-Anas Chennouf, Mandy Malick, Annie Beaudoin","doi":"10.1097/jp9.0000000000000162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Long term surveillance of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) remains controversial, particularly regarding cysts follow up > 5 years. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess the risk of malignant transformation of presumed BD-IPMN during follow-up and identify clinical and morphological predictors of malignancy.\n \n \n \n We performed a retrospective analysis of data from all patients with a presumed BD-IPMN diagnosis at the CIUSSS de l’Estrie CHUS, from 2004-2018.\n \n \n \n The final database included 380 patients with presumed BD-IPMN with a median follow up of 43,9 months (IQR 28,6-73,3 months). Mean age at diagnosis was 65,5 years [27-90], 159 patients (42,8%) were male and 17 patients (4,5%) underwent resection of their lesion during their surveillance period. In our cohort, 132 patients (34,7%) had a follow-up > 5 years.\n Overall risk of malignancy was 2.1% [0.9%-4.1%]. During follow-up, neoplastic transformation was observed in 2/132 patients (1,5%) surveilled > 5 years. Malignancy was significantly associated with cyst growth > 2,5 mm/year (57,1% vs 5,8% p < 0,001) dilated MPD (71,4% vs 4,9% p<0,001), solid component (71,4% vs 1,3% p<0,001), positive cytology (37,5% vs 0,5% p<0,001), development of high-risk stigmatas (87,5% vs 1,9% p <0,001) or worrisome features (87,5% vs 23,9% p<0,001) during follow up and symptoms of jaundice (25% vs 0,5% p=0,002) and abdominal pain (50% vs 9,4% p=0,005).\n \n \n \n While overall malignancy risk remains low in presumed BD-IPMN, continuous surveillance should be pursued after 5 years in surgically fit individuals, particularly in patients who develop our identified risk factors.\n","PeriodicalId":92925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pancreatology","volume":"6 5‐6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jp9.0000000000000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long term surveillance of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMN) remains controversial, particularly regarding cysts follow up > 5 years. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess the risk of malignant transformation of presumed BD-IPMN during follow-up and identify clinical and morphological predictors of malignancy. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from all patients with a presumed BD-IPMN diagnosis at the CIUSSS de l’Estrie CHUS, from 2004-2018. The final database included 380 patients with presumed BD-IPMN with a median follow up of 43,9 months (IQR 28,6-73,3 months). Mean age at diagnosis was 65,5 years [27-90], 159 patients (42,8%) were male and 17 patients (4,5%) underwent resection of their lesion during their surveillance period. In our cohort, 132 patients (34,7%) had a follow-up > 5 years. Overall risk of malignancy was 2.1% [0.9%-4.1%]. During follow-up, neoplastic transformation was observed in 2/132 patients (1,5%) surveilled > 5 years. Malignancy was significantly associated with cyst growth > 2,5 mm/year (57,1% vs 5,8% p < 0,001) dilated MPD (71,4% vs 4,9% p<0,001), solid component (71,4% vs 1,3% p<0,001), positive cytology (37,5% vs 0,5% p<0,001), development of high-risk stigmatas (87,5% vs 1,9% p <0,001) or worrisome features (87,5% vs 23,9% p<0,001) during follow up and symptoms of jaundice (25% vs 0,5% p=0,002) and abdominal pain (50% vs 9,4% p=0,005). While overall malignancy risk remains low in presumed BD-IPMN, continuous surveillance should be pursued after 5 years in surgically fit individuals, particularly in patients who develop our identified risk factors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分支导管内乳头状粘液瘤(BD-IPMN):5 年监测后肿瘤风险的回顾性研究
对分支导管内乳头状粘液瘤(BD-IPMN)的长期监测仍存在争议,尤其是对随访时间超过 5 年的囊肿。本研究的主要终点是评估随访期间假定的 BD-IPMN 恶性转化的风险,并确定恶变的临床和形态学预测因素。 我们对CIUSSS de l'Estrie CHUS在2004-2018年间诊断出的所有假定BD-IPMN患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。 最终数据库包括380名推测为BD-IPMN的患者,中位随访时间为43.9个月(IQR为28.6-73.3个月)。诊断时的平均年龄为 65.5 岁 [27-90],159 名患者(42.8%)为男性,17 名患者(4.5%)在监测期间接受了病灶切除术。在我们的队列中,132 名患者(34.7%)的随访时间超过 5 年。恶性肿瘤的总体风险为 2.1% [0.9%-4.1%]。在随访期间,2/132 名(1.5%)随访时间超过 5 年的患者出现了肿瘤变。恶性肿瘤与囊肿生长速度大于 2.5 毫米/年(57.1% vs 5.8% p < 0.001)、MPD 扩张(71.4% vs 4.9% p < 0.001)、实性成分(71.4% vs 1.3% p < 0.001)、细胞学阳性(37.5% vs 0.5% p < 0、001)、随访期间出现高风险烙印(87.5% vs 1.9% p<0.001)或令人担忧的特征(87.5% vs 23.9% p<0.001)以及黄疸(25% vs 0.5% p=0.002)和腹痛(50% vs 9.4% p=0.005)症状。 虽然假定的 BD-IPMN 的总体恶性肿瘤风险仍然很低,但对于适合手术的患者,尤其是出现我们所确定的风险因素的患者,应在 5 年后继续进行监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reappraisal of the Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Chinese High-volume Center Experience Phase angle is an indicator of GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition in patients undergoing major pancreatic and biliary surgery: a cross-sectional study Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Urinastatin combined with octreotide versus sole octreotide in severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing to construct a CD8 + T cell-related immune gene signature in pancreatic cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1