Flexicurity and self-perceived work–life balance in the EU27: A repeated cross-sectional multilevel analysis

IF 1.7 4区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Economic and Industrial Democracy Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1177/0143831x231213024
Marina Ferent-Pipas, Dorina Lazar
{"title":"Flexicurity and self-perceived work–life balance in the EU27: A repeated cross-sectional multilevel analysis","authors":"Marina Ferent-Pipas, Dorina Lazar","doi":"10.1177/0143831x231213024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationship between flexicurity policies and work–life balance, addressing the research question ‘How do higher flexicurity efforts in a country relate to employee perceptions of work–life balance?’ The European Commission adopted flexicurity in 2007 and proposed employment quality as an expected outcome. Work–life balance, a dimension monitored as part of employment quality, has so far been assumed as an implicit outcome of flexicurity, but no empirical research is dedicated to the topic per se. In this article the authors construct a composite indicator to proxy for national flexicurity efforts following the European Commission’s guidelines. For work–life balance and other individual characteristics, the authors employ data on about 74,000 EU27 employees from the three latest waves of the European Working Conditions Survey. First, findings show that the between-country differences in work–life balance were narrower in 2015 compared to 2005. Second, the multilevel analysis suggests that the higher a country scores as regards its flexicurity policies, the likelier its citizens are to report having a work–life balance.","PeriodicalId":47456,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x231213024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between flexicurity policies and work–life balance, addressing the research question ‘How do higher flexicurity efforts in a country relate to employee perceptions of work–life balance?’ The European Commission adopted flexicurity in 2007 and proposed employment quality as an expected outcome. Work–life balance, a dimension monitored as part of employment quality, has so far been assumed as an implicit outcome of flexicurity, but no empirical research is dedicated to the topic per se. In this article the authors construct a composite indicator to proxy for national flexicurity efforts following the European Commission’s guidelines. For work–life balance and other individual characteristics, the authors employ data on about 74,000 EU27 employees from the three latest waves of the European Working Conditions Survey. First, findings show that the between-country differences in work–life balance were narrower in 2015 compared to 2005. Second, the multilevel analysis suggests that the higher a country scores as regards its flexicurity policies, the likelier its citizens are to report having a work–life balance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟 27 国的弹性保障和自我感觉的工作与生活平衡:重复横截面多层次分析
本研究探讨了弹性保障政策与工作-生活平衡之间的关系,解决了 "一个国家较高的弹性保障力度与员工对工作-生活平衡的看法有何关系?欧盟委员会于 2007 年通过了 "弹性保障 "政策,并将就业质量作为一项预期成果。工作与生活的平衡是就业质量监测的一个维度,迄今为止一直被认为是灵活保障的一个隐含结果,但没有专门针对该主题本身的实证研究。在本文中,作者根据欧盟委员会的指导方针,构建了一个综合指标来代表各国的弹性保障工作。对于工作与生活的平衡和其他个人特征,作者采用了最新三波欧洲工作条件调查中约 74,000 名欧盟 27 国雇员的数据。首先,研究结果表明,与2005年相比,2015年工作与生活平衡方面的国家间差异缩小了。其次,多层次分析表明,一个国家的弹性保障政策得分越高,其公民就越有可能报告自己在工作与生活之间取得了平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Economic and Industrial Democracy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Economic and Industrial Democracy is an international peer reviewed journal that focuses on the study of initiatives designed to enhance the quality of working life through extending the democratic control of workers over the workplace and the economy. How those initiatives are affected by wider political, economic and technological factors are also of interest. Special emphasis is laid on international coverage of empirical material, including discussions of the social and economic conditions in various countries.
期刊最新文献
The employee representation plan movement in the United States 1913–1935: The attempted legitimation of novel organizational forms Neoliberalism by stealth? Labour reforms and institutional discontinuity in worker representation in France Crafting alternative work organisations: Paradoxes of workplace democracy and emancipation in worker-buyout cooperatives The union default: Increasing union membership by facilitating the experience of unionism and overcoming the role of inertia Elucidating the relationship between high-investment HR systems and workforce engagement: The role of employee education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1