Physician Perceptions of Cannabidiol (CBD) and Cannabis in Sports Medicine and Performance

IF 1.2 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Translational sports medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1155/2023/8824466
Brendon Ross, Thomas Trojian, D. Cushman
{"title":"Physician Perceptions of Cannabidiol (CBD) and Cannabis in Sports Medicine and Performance","authors":"Brendon Ross, Thomas Trojian, D. Cushman","doi":"10.1155/2023/8824466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. There is growing evidence regarding cannabinoid use in sports medicine and performance, especially cannabidiol (CBD). This study aims to determine if sports medicine physicians are recommending cannabinoids for therapeutic purposes, as well as analyze perceptions of cannabinoids within sports medicine and performance. Methods. Physician members of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) completed an anonymous survey on demographics, CBD and Cannabis recommendations, as well as attitudes toward cannabinoid products within sports medicine. Factors associated with CBD and cannabis recommendations as well as perceptual differences were found using multivariate regression modelling. Results. Responses from 333 physicians were recorded. The following groups were less likely to agree with allowing cannabis for recreational purposes: female gender (coeff. = 0.79 (0.33–1.25), \n \n p\n =\n 0.001\n \n ), increasing age (coeff. = 0.04 (0.02, 0.07), \n \n p\n  \n <\n  \n 0.001\n \n ), and rural respondents (compared to baseline urban, coeff. = 1.16 (0.36, 1.95), \n \n p\n =\n 0.004\n \n ). Similarly, these three factors were associated with a higher likelihood of disagreeing with WADA removing cannabis from the prohibited substance list and with the NCAA allowing CBD use by collegiate athletes (\n \n p\n ≤\n 0.045\n \n ). CBD was less likely to be recommended by pediatricians, rural physicians, and academic physicians (\n \n p\n ≤\n 0.030\n \n ). Male physicians and younger physicians were less likely to identify cannabis as performance-enhancing (\n \n p\n ≤\n 0.042\n \n ). Conclusions. Sports medicine physicians have varying views on cannabinoids. While sports medicine physicians generally have favorable attitudes toward CBD and cannabis, these perceptions appear to be significantly affected by age, practice type, and gender.","PeriodicalId":75247,"journal":{"name":"Translational sports medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8824466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. There is growing evidence regarding cannabinoid use in sports medicine and performance, especially cannabidiol (CBD). This study aims to determine if sports medicine physicians are recommending cannabinoids for therapeutic purposes, as well as analyze perceptions of cannabinoids within sports medicine and performance. Methods. Physician members of the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM) completed an anonymous survey on demographics, CBD and Cannabis recommendations, as well as attitudes toward cannabinoid products within sports medicine. Factors associated with CBD and cannabis recommendations as well as perceptual differences were found using multivariate regression modelling. Results. Responses from 333 physicians were recorded. The following groups were less likely to agree with allowing cannabis for recreational purposes: female gender (coeff. = 0.79 (0.33–1.25), p = 0.001 ), increasing age (coeff. = 0.04 (0.02, 0.07), p   <   0.001 ), and rural respondents (compared to baseline urban, coeff. = 1.16 (0.36, 1.95), p = 0.004 ). Similarly, these three factors were associated with a higher likelihood of disagreeing with WADA removing cannabis from the prohibited substance list and with the NCAA allowing CBD use by collegiate athletes ( p ≤ 0.045 ). CBD was less likely to be recommended by pediatricians, rural physicians, and academic physicians ( p ≤ 0.030 ). Male physicians and younger physicians were less likely to identify cannabis as performance-enhancing ( p ≤ 0.042 ). Conclusions. Sports medicine physicians have varying views on cannabinoids. While sports medicine physicians generally have favorable attitudes toward CBD and cannabis, these perceptions appear to be significantly affected by age, practice type, and gender.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生对运动医学和运动表现中的大麻二酚(CBD)和大麻的看法
目的。越来越多的证据表明大麻素(尤其是大麻二酚 (CBD))可用于运动医学和运动表现。本研究旨在确定运动医学医生是否推荐大麻素用于治疗目的,并分析运动医学和运动表现中对大麻素的看法。研究方法。美国运动医学医学会 (AMSSM) 的医生成员完成了一项匿名调查,内容涉及人口统计学、CBD 和大麻推荐以及对运动医学中大麻产品的态度。使用多元回归建模法发现了与 CBD 和大麻推荐相关的因素以及认知差异。结果。共记录了 333 名医生的回答。以下群体不太可能同意允许将大麻用于娱乐目的:女性(系数 = 0.79 (0.33-1.25), p = 0.001)、年龄增长(系数 = 0.04 (0.02, 0.07), p < 0.001)和农村受访者(与基线城市相比,系数 = 1.16 (0.36, 1.95), p = 0.004)。同样,这三个因素也与不同意世界反兴奋剂机构将大麻从禁用物质清单中删除以及不同意国家大学生体育协会允许大学生运动员使用 CBD 的可能性较高有关(p ≤ 0.045)。儿科医生、乡村医生和学术医生推荐使用 CBD 的可能性较低(P ≤ 0.030)。男性医生和年轻医生不太可能将大麻认定为提高成绩的药物 ( p ≤ 0.042 )。结论。运动医学医生对大麻素的看法各不相同。虽然运动医学医生普遍对 CBD 和大麻持赞成态度,但这些看法似乎受到年龄、执业类型和性别的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Anatomical Cross-Sectional Area of Psoas Major Muscle Using an Ultrasound Imaging System Combined With an Inertial Measurement Unit: Improved Reliability in the US Using IMU-Based Positioning Techniques. Effect of 1-Week Weight Loss While Maintaining Total Body Water on Jump Performance. Lower Extremity Asymmetry Values Derived From Multiple Strength Testing Modes Are Associated With Perceived Functional Capabilities Among University Athletes. Athlete Monitoring Systems in Elite Men's Basketball: Challenges, Recommendations, and Future Perspectives. An Injury Prevention Programme in Physical Education Teacher Education Students: Process Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Sports Setting Matrix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1