Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science

IF 2.2 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.1002/leap.1589
Aron Laxdal, Tommy Haugen
{"title":"Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science","authors":"Aron Laxdal,&nbsp;Tommy Haugen","doi":"10.1002/leap.1589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated.</li>\n \n <li>While it is unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted.</li>\n \n <li>Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature.</li>\n \n <li>The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects.</li>\n \n <li>We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • The peer review system is viewed by many as being flawed and antiquated.
  • While it is unlikely that the system will be overhauled completely, some changes seem to be warranted.
  • Our proposal is to change the incentives to do peer review by making reviews a part of the tenure criteria and valuing reviews as a contribution to the literature.
  • The proposal would require more transparency than is currently the industry norm to prevent unwanted effects.
  • We believe these changes would not only increase willingness to review, but also lead to shorter turnaround times and increase the quality of reviews.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胡萝卜在哪里?建议开始奖励同行评审者对科学的贡献
我们的建议是改变同行评议的激励机制,将评议作为任期标准的一部分,并将评议作为对文献的贡献加以重视。该建议要求比目前的行业标准更加透明,以防止不必要的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Purchase and publish: Early career researchers and open access publishing costs Issue Information The promotion and implementation of open science measures among high-performing journals from Brazil, Mexico, Portugal, and Spain The stock characters in the editorial boards of journals run by predatory publishers Exploring named-entity recognition techniques for academic books
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1