{"title":"PRECARIOUS HOUSING BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER AN EPISODE OF LATE-LIFE HOMELESSNESS","authors":"Anthony C Traver, Holly Dabelko-Schoeny","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This qualitative study aims to understand how the living environments occupied by older adults before, during, and after an episode of homelessness inform their access to a healthy, stable, and dignified life. Indicators of accommodation, quality, and service integration are explored using the Aging in the Right Place conceptual framework. Through partnerships with a homeless shelter, a meal site, and a mental health outreach team in Columbus, OH, demographic questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were completed with 22 older adults with an episode of late-life homelessness. Nine direct service providers were also interviewed. Interviews were analyzed using the team-based flexible coding method in Nvivo 1.6.1. Results indicated that low or no income in late life forced older adults to occupy a continuum of precarious and low-quality living environments that include shared housing, doubling up, emergency shelters, institutional settings, and living on the land. AIRP indicators are discussed for each. Conflict, death of a support person, mental and behavioral challenges, unit deterioration, rental price increases, and social isolation forced OA down the housing continuum and into homelessness. Sub-optimal conditions interacted with age to exacerbate health conditions, create social isolation, and expose OA to harm. Informal and formal relationships, emergency shelter services, vouchers, and specific behaviors and attitudes were identified as critical for securing affordable and accommodating housing in which to age. Understanding the experiences of OPEH who are striving to occupy their subjective right place to age can help service providers and policymakers meet the unique needs of precariously housed OA.","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"89 8","pages":"64 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.0206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract This qualitative study aims to understand how the living environments occupied by older adults before, during, and after an episode of homelessness inform their access to a healthy, stable, and dignified life. Indicators of accommodation, quality, and service integration are explored using the Aging in the Right Place conceptual framework. Through partnerships with a homeless shelter, a meal site, and a mental health outreach team in Columbus, OH, demographic questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were completed with 22 older adults with an episode of late-life homelessness. Nine direct service providers were also interviewed. Interviews were analyzed using the team-based flexible coding method in Nvivo 1.6.1. Results indicated that low or no income in late life forced older adults to occupy a continuum of precarious and low-quality living environments that include shared housing, doubling up, emergency shelters, institutional settings, and living on the land. AIRP indicators are discussed for each. Conflict, death of a support person, mental and behavioral challenges, unit deterioration, rental price increases, and social isolation forced OA down the housing continuum and into homelessness. Sub-optimal conditions interacted with age to exacerbate health conditions, create social isolation, and expose OA to harm. Informal and formal relationships, emergency shelter services, vouchers, and specific behaviors and attitudes were identified as critical for securing affordable and accommodating housing in which to age. Understanding the experiences of OPEH who are striving to occupy their subjective right place to age can help service providers and policymakers meet the unique needs of precariously housed OA.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.