Analysis of the effect of therapy for severe intracranial infection after craniotomy

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurorestoratology Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jnrt.2023.100092
Yuchen Zhu , Guihong Zhou , Xiaomin Yuan , Zhen Li , Qiang Xu , Maoyun Zhang
{"title":"Analysis of the effect of therapy for severe intracranial infection after craniotomy","authors":"Yuchen Zhu ,&nbsp;Guihong Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiaomin Yuan ,&nbsp;Zhen Li ,&nbsp;Qiang Xu ,&nbsp;Maoyun Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jnrt.2023.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To retrospectively analyze the distribution characteristics of pathogenic bacteria in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with severe intracranial infection after craniotomy and treatment results. The aim was to provide a clinical basis and reference for improving treatment for severe intracranial infections.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective analysis of the distribution of pathogenic bacteria and the therapeutic effect for 43 patients who developed severe intracranial infections after craniotomy. All patients had positive CSF cultures and were treated in two hospitals in Beijing from May 2015 to May 2020. All patients received an intravenous injection of sensitive antibiotics combined with a CSF lateral ventricle catheter or lumbar cistern drainage. Antibiotic lavage treatment was administered through an external drain.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CSF bacterial culture results for the 43 patients showed 34 single-strain infections (26 Gram-positive bacteria and 8 Gram-negative bacteria) and 9 multistrain infections. Fifty-two pathogenic strains were isolated, namely 32 Gram-positive bacteria (61.54%), 18 Gram-negative bacteria (34.61%), and 2 fungi (3.85%). After combined treatment, 29 patients (67.44%) were cured; treatment was effective for 7 patients (16.28%) and ineffective for 7 patients (16.28%). After 6 months of follow-up, the 36 surviving patients were cured of infection. The Glasgow Outcome Scale score results showed that 5 of the 36 (13.9%) patients had a persistent vegetative state; 13 (36.1%) had severe disability; 12 (33.3%) had moderate disability; and 6 (16.7%) had mild disability.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CSF pathogenic bacteria in patients with intracranial infection after craniotomy were mainly Gram-positive bacteria, primarily <em>Staphylococcus epidermidis</em>. A small number of patients had mixed bacterial infections. Owing to the presence of implanted devices in patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, the antibacterial therapeutic effect was worse than that for other types of postoperative infections. Therefore, when initial intravenous antibiotics are ineffective, the shunt device should be removed or replaced as soon as possible. When initial intravenous antibiotics are ineffective and severe intracranial infection occurs, a combined treatment plan should be adopted. That is, CSF drainage and antibiotic lavage should be performed cautiously with the intravenous injection of sensitive antibiotics. Our clinical data confirmed that postoperative neurosurgical infection could lead to different degrees of nerve dysfunction, which should be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242623000529/pdfft?md5=049f449d4bd4ff7e0f8db2a860325221&pid=1-s2.0-S2324242623000529-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2324242623000529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To retrospectively analyze the distribution characteristics of pathogenic bacteria in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with severe intracranial infection after craniotomy and treatment results. The aim was to provide a clinical basis and reference for improving treatment for severe intracranial infections.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of the distribution of pathogenic bacteria and the therapeutic effect for 43 patients who developed severe intracranial infections after craniotomy. All patients had positive CSF cultures and were treated in two hospitals in Beijing from May 2015 to May 2020. All patients received an intravenous injection of sensitive antibiotics combined with a CSF lateral ventricle catheter or lumbar cistern drainage. Antibiotic lavage treatment was administered through an external drain.

Results

The CSF bacterial culture results for the 43 patients showed 34 single-strain infections (26 Gram-positive bacteria and 8 Gram-negative bacteria) and 9 multistrain infections. Fifty-two pathogenic strains were isolated, namely 32 Gram-positive bacteria (61.54%), 18 Gram-negative bacteria (34.61%), and 2 fungi (3.85%). After combined treatment, 29 patients (67.44%) were cured; treatment was effective for 7 patients (16.28%) and ineffective for 7 patients (16.28%). After 6 months of follow-up, the 36 surviving patients were cured of infection. The Glasgow Outcome Scale score results showed that 5 of the 36 (13.9%) patients had a persistent vegetative state; 13 (36.1%) had severe disability; 12 (33.3%) had moderate disability; and 6 (16.7%) had mild disability.

Conclusion

CSF pathogenic bacteria in patients with intracranial infection after craniotomy were mainly Gram-positive bacteria, primarily Staphylococcus epidermidis. A small number of patients had mixed bacterial infections. Owing to the presence of implanted devices in patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery, the antibacterial therapeutic effect was worse than that for other types of postoperative infections. Therefore, when initial intravenous antibiotics are ineffective, the shunt device should be removed or replaced as soon as possible. When initial intravenous antibiotics are ineffective and severe intracranial infection occurs, a combined treatment plan should be adopted. That is, CSF drainage and antibiotic lavage should be performed cautiously with the intravenous injection of sensitive antibiotics. Our clinical data confirmed that postoperative neurosurgical infection could lead to different degrees of nerve dysfunction, which should be considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开颅手术后严重颅内感染的治疗效果分析
目的 回顾性分析开颅手术后重症颅内感染患者脑脊液(CSF)中病原菌的分布特点及治疗效果。方法对 43 例开颅手术后发生严重颅内感染的患者的病原菌分布及治疗效果进行回顾性分析。所有患者的脑脊液培养结果均为阳性,并于 2015 年 5 月至 2020 年 5 月期间在北京两家医院接受治疗。所有患者均接受了敏感抗生素静脉注射,并结合脑脊液侧脑室导管或腰椎蓄水池引流术。结果 43 例患者的脑脊液细菌培养结果显示,34 例为单菌株感染(26 例革兰阳性菌,8 例革兰阴性菌),9 例为多菌株感染。共分离出 52 株病原菌,其中革兰氏阳性菌 32 株(61.54%),革兰氏阴性菌 18 株(34.61%),真菌 2 株(3.85%)。综合治疗后,29 名患者(67.44%)治愈;7 名患者(16.28%)有效,7 名患者(16.28%)无效。经过 6 个月的随访,36 名存活患者的感染均已治愈。格拉斯哥结果量表评分结果显示,36 名患者中有 5 人(13.9%)持续处于植物状态;13 人(36.1%)重度残疾;12 人(33.3%)中度残疾;6 人(16.7%)轻度残疾。少数患者有混合细菌感染。由于接受脑室腹腔分流手术的患者体内有植入装置,抗菌治疗效果比其他类型的术后感染差。因此,当初始静脉注射抗生素无效时,应尽快移除或更换分流装置。当初始静脉注射抗生素无效且发生严重颅内感染时,应采取综合治疗方案。即在谨慎进行脑脊液引流和抗生素灌洗的同时,静脉注射敏感抗生素。我们的临床数据证实,神经外科术后感染可导致不同程度的神经功能障碍,应引起重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Journal of Neurorestoratology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Letter to Editor: Authors' response to “Respondence of ‘Brain iron deposition and whole-exome sequencing of non-Wilson's disease hypoceruloplasminemia in a family’” Correspondence: “Application of deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke neurorestoration: A review” Topographic and temporal patterns of dyskinesia in multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonism Bilateral hypertrophic olivary degeneration caused by unilateral midbrain infarction: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1