Leaflet Mechanical Stress in Different Designs and Generations of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: An in Vitro Study

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Structural Heart Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.shj.2023.100262
Viktória Stanová Dipl-Ing, MSc, PhD , Régis Rieu Dipl-Ing, PhD , Lionel Thollon PhD , Erwan Salaun MD, PhD , Josep Rodés-Cabau MD , Nancy Côté PhD , Diego Mantovani Dipl-Ing, PhD , Philippe Pibarot DVM, PhD
{"title":"Leaflet Mechanical Stress in Different Designs and Generations of Transcatheter Aortic Valves: An in Vitro Study","authors":"Viktória Stanová Dipl-Ing, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Régis Rieu Dipl-Ing, PhD ,&nbsp;Lionel Thollon PhD ,&nbsp;Erwan Salaun MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Josep Rodés-Cabau MD ,&nbsp;Nancy Côté PhD ,&nbsp;Diego Mantovani Dipl-Ing, PhD ,&nbsp;Philippe Pibarot DVM, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.shj.2023.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It is unknown whether bioprostheses used for transcatheter aortic valve implantation will have similar long-term durability as those used for surgical aortic valve replacement. Repetitive mechanical stress applied to the valve leaflets, particularly during diastole, is the main determinant of structural valve deterioration. Leaflet mechanical stress cannot be measured in vivo. The objective of this in vitro/in silico study was thus to compare the magnitude and regional distribution of leaflet mechanical stress in old vs new generations of self-expanding (SE) vs balloon expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valves (THVs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A double activation simulator was used for in vitro testing of two generations of SE THV (Medtronic CoreValve 26 mm and EVOLUT PRO 26 mm) and two generations of BE THV (Edwards SAPIEN 23 mm vs SAPIEN-3 23 mm). These THVs were implanted within a 21-mm aortic annulus. A noncontact system based on stereophotogammetry and digital image correlation with high spatial and temporal resolution (2000 img/sec) was used to visualize the valve leaflet motion and perform the three-dimensional analysis. A finite element model of the valve was developed, and the leaflet deformation obtained from the digital image correlation analysis was applied to the finite element model to calculate local leaflet mechanical stress during diastole.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The maximum von Mises leaflet stress was higher in early vs new THV generation (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and in BE vs SE THV (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05): early generation BE: 2.48 vs SE: 1.40 MPa; new generation BE: 1.68 vs SE: 1.07 MPa. For both types of THV, the highest values of leaflet stress were primarily observed in the upper leaflet edge near the commissures and to a lesser extent in the mid-portion of the leaflet body, which is the area where structural leaflet deterioration most often occurs in vivo.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this in vitro/in silico study suggest that: i) Newer generations of THVs have ∼30% lower leaflet mechanical stress than the early generations; ii) For a given generation, SE THVs have lower leaflet mechanical stress than BE THVs. Further studies are needed to determine if these differences between new vs early THV generations and between SE vs BE THVs will translate into significant differences in long-term valve durability in vivo.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36053,"journal":{"name":"Structural Heart","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870623001987/pdfft?md5=87b82c12387f302694e45cd357df1f66&pid=1-s2.0-S2474870623001987-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2474870623001987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It is unknown whether bioprostheses used for transcatheter aortic valve implantation will have similar long-term durability as those used for surgical aortic valve replacement. Repetitive mechanical stress applied to the valve leaflets, particularly during diastole, is the main determinant of structural valve deterioration. Leaflet mechanical stress cannot be measured in vivo. The objective of this in vitro/in silico study was thus to compare the magnitude and regional distribution of leaflet mechanical stress in old vs new generations of self-expanding (SE) vs balloon expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valves (THVs).

Methods

A double activation simulator was used for in vitro testing of two generations of SE THV (Medtronic CoreValve 26 mm and EVOLUT PRO 26 mm) and two generations of BE THV (Edwards SAPIEN 23 mm vs SAPIEN-3 23 mm). These THVs were implanted within a 21-mm aortic annulus. A noncontact system based on stereophotogammetry and digital image correlation with high spatial and temporal resolution (2000 img/sec) was used to visualize the valve leaflet motion and perform the three-dimensional analysis. A finite element model of the valve was developed, and the leaflet deformation obtained from the digital image correlation analysis was applied to the finite element model to calculate local leaflet mechanical stress during diastole.

Results

The maximum von Mises leaflet stress was higher in early vs new THV generation (p < 0.05) and in BE vs SE THV (p < 0.05): early generation BE: 2.48 vs SE: 1.40 MPa; new generation BE: 1.68 vs SE: 1.07 MPa. For both types of THV, the highest values of leaflet stress were primarily observed in the upper leaflet edge near the commissures and to a lesser extent in the mid-portion of the leaflet body, which is the area where structural leaflet deterioration most often occurs in vivo.

Conclusions

The results of this in vitro/in silico study suggest that: i) Newer generations of THVs have ∼30% lower leaflet mechanical stress than the early generations; ii) For a given generation, SE THVs have lower leaflet mechanical stress than BE THVs. Further studies are needed to determine if these differences between new vs early THV generations and between SE vs BE THVs will translate into significant differences in long-term valve durability in vivo.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同设计和世代的经导管主动脉瓣的瓣叶机械应力:体外研究
背景经导管主动脉瓣植入术中使用的生物假体是否具有与外科主动脉瓣置换术中使用的生物假体相似的长期耐久性,目前还不得而知。瓣叶受到的重复机械应力,尤其是在舒张期,是瓣膜结构退化的主要决定因素。瓣叶机械应力无法在体内测量。因此,这项体外/硅学研究的目的是比较新旧两代自扩张(SE)和球囊扩张(BE)经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)瓣叶机械应力的大小和区域分布。方法使用双活化模拟器对两代 SE THV(美敦力 CoreValve 26 毫米和 EVOLUT PRO 26 毫米)和两代 BE THV(Edwards SAPIEN 23 毫米和 SAPIEN-3 23 毫米)进行体外测试。这些 THV 均植入 21 毫米的主动脉瓣环内。使用基于立体摄影测量和数字图像关联的非接触系统,以高空间和时间分辨率(2000 IMG/秒)观察瓣叶运动并进行三维分析。结果 早期 THV 与新一代 THV 相比(p < 0.05),BE THV 与 SE THV 相比(p < 0.05),Von Mises 瓣叶最大应力更高:早期 BE:2.48 MPa,SE:1.40 MPa;新一代 BE:1.68 MPa,SE:1.07 MPa。对于这两种类型的 THV,小叶应力的最高值主要出现在靠近合叶的小叶上缘,其次是小叶体的中间部分,而这正是体内小叶结构退化最常发生的区域。结论这项体外/硅学研究结果表明:i) 新一代 THV 的小叶机械应力比早期 THV 低 30%;ii) 在给定的一代中,SE THV 的小叶机械应力比 BE THV 低。需要进一步研究来确定新一代 THV 与早期 THV 之间以及 SE THV 与 BE THV 之间的这些差异是否会转化为体内瓣膜长期耐久性的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Heart
Structural Heart Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
Moderate Aortic Stenosis—Advanced Imaging, Risk Assessment, and Treatment Strategies The Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Conduction Study: The Value of the His-Ventricular Interval in Risk Stratification for Post-TAVR Atrioventricular-Block Large Field-of-View Intravascular Ultrasound for Mitral and Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Guidance: A Pilot Study Quantitative Aortography Analysis of JenaValve’s Trilogy Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation or Stenosis A Novel Risk Score Facilitates Femoral Artery Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Passage-Puncture Score
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1