{"title":"What's in a copula?","authors":"Terrance Gatchalian","doi":"10.33137/twpl.v46i1.39252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper develops a syntactic account for Kirundi's two \"copulas\", the inflecting -ri and the invariant ni. I propose that these two morphemes correspond to two distinct syntactic positions, v and C respectively. This stands in contrast to a previous, semantic account for the analogous system in Kinyarwanda. I present morphological and distributional data which support the view that -ri lexicalizes v for two reasons: (i) to permit the projection of independently necessary verbal inflectional heads and to morphologically host the affixes that lexicalize them and (ii) to bind the eventuality variable introduced by location-denoting PP predicates. The two conditions are unified under the analysis that -ri, but not ni, indicates the presence of v. I argue that this account is able to capture a wider range of the distribution and properties of the two \"copulas\" than prior accounts.","PeriodicalId":442006,"journal":{"name":"Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics","volume":"12 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v46i1.39252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper develops a syntactic account for Kirundi's two "copulas", the inflecting -ri and the invariant ni. I propose that these two morphemes correspond to two distinct syntactic positions, v and C respectively. This stands in contrast to a previous, semantic account for the analogous system in Kinyarwanda. I present morphological and distributional data which support the view that -ri lexicalizes v for two reasons: (i) to permit the projection of independently necessary verbal inflectional heads and to morphologically host the affixes that lexicalize them and (ii) to bind the eventuality variable introduced by location-denoting PP predicates. The two conditions are unified under the analysis that -ri, but not ni, indicates the presence of v. I argue that this account is able to capture a wider range of the distribution and properties of the two "copulas" than prior accounts.