Problems of precautionary measure application in the view of detention under guard in Ukraine

Olga Hlyvchak, Olena Kovalchuk
{"title":"Problems of precautionary measure application in the view of detention under guard in Ukraine","authors":"Olga Hlyvchak, Olena Kovalchuk","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annotation. The article examines problematic issues related to the use of preventive measures in the form of detention in criminal cases and the experience of foreign countries in this area. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding detention and its decisions are analyzed in the context of legal norms and standards related to human rights. Particular attention is paid to the experience of countries where alternative preventive measures are implemented in order to improve the justice system and ensure human rights, which can be effective and do not limit human rights to such a severe degree as detention. In addition, issues related to unsubstantiated detention decisions, excessively long proceedings and the need to increase the transparency of this process are considered. The importance of observing human rights during the application of a measure in the form of detention, which is the most severe and restrictive measure, is particularly emphasized, therefore its application must be justified and fair.","PeriodicalId":421282,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Annotation. The article examines problematic issues related to the use of preventive measures in the form of detention in criminal cases and the experience of foreign countries in this area. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding detention and its decisions are analyzed in the context of legal norms and standards related to human rights. Particular attention is paid to the experience of countries where alternative preventive measures are implemented in order to improve the justice system and ensure human rights, which can be effective and do not limit human rights to such a severe degree as detention. In addition, issues related to unsubstantiated detention decisions, excessively long proceedings and the need to increase the transparency of this process are considered. The importance of observing human rights during the application of a measure in the form of detention, which is the most severe and restrictive measure, is particularly emphasized, therefore its application must be justified and fair.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在乌克兰看守所拘留情况下适用预防措施的问题
说明。文章探讨了与在刑事案件中使用拘留形式的预防措施有关的问题,以及外国在这一领域的经验。文章结合与人权有关的法律规范和标准,分析了欧洲人权法院在拘留方面的做法及其裁决。特别关注那些为改善司法系统和确保人权而实施替代性预防措施的国家的经验,这些措施可能是有效的,而且不会像拘留那样严重限制人权。此外,还考虑了与未经证实的拘留决定、过长的诉讼程序以及提高这一过程透明度的必要性有关的问题。特别强调了在采取拘留这种最严厉、限制性最强的措施时遵守人权的重要性,因此,采取这种措施必须是合理和公正的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Canonical pedagogy in metaphysical law Peculiarities of the introduction of the joint transit procedure in Ukraine Cyber security of the banking sector of Ukraine: concepts, problems and experience of foreign countries Measures to ensure the institutional independence of the judiciary The role of higher government bodies in European integration processes of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1