On martial status as a special type of administrative-legal regime

O. Ostapenko, Oksana Baik
{"title":"On martial status as a special type of administrative-legal regime","authors":"O. Ostapenko, Oksana Baik","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the theoretical and legal approaches to the concept, content and methodology of the introduction and functioning of one of the varieties of the administrative-legal regime ‒ the martial law regime, as well as the relationship between the legal categories of «restriction» «prohibition», «obligation», which are components of administrative and legal regimes. It is noted that modern approaches to the analysis of martial law, as a special type of administrative-legal regime, are oriented, first of all, to its legislative definition, which enshrines constitutional provisions on the foundations of national security, as well as the legal regime of martial law. One of the reasons for imposing martial law is military aggression by another state using armed forces or other formations. At the same time, it was found that modern approaches to the tasks of the state and society during the period of martial law, to a certain extent, have a historical relationship with the works of scientists of the past. It is emphasized that the legal regime of martial law indicates the temporary transfer of general public management to the military authorities with the granting of extraordinary powers. First of all, this applies to: 1) implementation of public order protection in order to ensure public and state security; 2) imposition of additional duties on citizens, as necessary, aimed at the proper functioning of the economy, restoration and construction of objects, structures for the needs of the economy, and increasing the defense capability of the country’s armed forces. The criteria for distinguishing between the legal regimes of emergency and martial law are analyzed. It was concluded that the existing restrictions and bans are temporary in nature and caused by Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine. At the same time, administrative and legal prohibitions under martial law are a way to ensure legality in the activities of public administration bodies. In addition, administrative-legal restrictions and prohibitions are the basis for preventing tortious and criminal-punishment behavior of all subjects of administrative-legal relations, without exception, during the period of the legal regime of martial law.","PeriodicalId":421282,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"29 S90","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the theoretical and legal approaches to the concept, content and methodology of the introduction and functioning of one of the varieties of the administrative-legal regime ‒ the martial law regime, as well as the relationship between the legal categories of «restriction» «prohibition», «obligation», which are components of administrative and legal regimes. It is noted that modern approaches to the analysis of martial law, as a special type of administrative-legal regime, are oriented, first of all, to its legislative definition, which enshrines constitutional provisions on the foundations of national security, as well as the legal regime of martial law. One of the reasons for imposing martial law is military aggression by another state using armed forces or other formations. At the same time, it was found that modern approaches to the tasks of the state and society during the period of martial law, to a certain extent, have a historical relationship with the works of scientists of the past. It is emphasized that the legal regime of martial law indicates the temporary transfer of general public management to the military authorities with the granting of extraordinary powers. First of all, this applies to: 1) implementation of public order protection in order to ensure public and state security; 2) imposition of additional duties on citizens, as necessary, aimed at the proper functioning of the economy, restoration and construction of objects, structures for the needs of the economy, and increasing the defense capability of the country’s armed forces. The criteria for distinguishing between the legal regimes of emergency and martial law are analyzed. It was concluded that the existing restrictions and bans are temporary in nature and caused by Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine. At the same time, administrative and legal prohibitions under martial law are a way to ensure legality in the activities of public administration bodies. In addition, administrative-legal restrictions and prohibitions are the basis for preventing tortious and criminal-punishment behavior of all subjects of administrative-legal relations, without exception, during the period of the legal regime of martial law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论作为一种特殊行政法律制度的武官地位
文章从理论和法律角度分析了行政法律制度的一种--戒严制度--的概念、内容和引入与运行方法,以及作为行政法律制度组成部分的 "限制""禁止""义务 "等法律类别之间的关系。需要指出的是,作为一种特殊类型的行政法律制度,现代分析戒严法的方法首先着眼于其立法定义,其中包含了关于国家安全基础的宪法条款以及戒严法的法律制度。实施戒严法的原因之一是另一个国家使用武装部队或其他建制进行军事侵略。同时,研究还发现,在戒严时期,现代国家和社会任务的处理方法在一定程度上与过去科学家的著作有历史渊源。需要强调的是,戒严的法律制度表明,一般公共管理暂时移交给军事当局,并赋予其特殊权力。首先,这适用于1) 实施公共秩序保护,以确保公共和国家安全;2) 必要时向公民征收额外义务,以确保经济正常运行,恢复和建设经济所需的物品和结构,并提高国家武装力量的防御能力。分析了区分紧急状态和戒严法律制度的标准。结论是,现有的限制和禁令是临时性的,是由俄罗斯对乌克兰的军事侵略造成的。同时,戒严法下的行政和法律禁令是确保公共行政机构活动合法性的一种方式。此外,行政法律限制和禁令是防止所有行政法律关系主体在戒严法律制度期间无一例外地实施侵权和刑事处罚行为的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Canonical pedagogy in metaphysical law Peculiarities of the introduction of the joint transit procedure in Ukraine Cyber security of the banking sector of Ukraine: concepts, problems and experience of foreign countries Measures to ensure the institutional independence of the judiciary The role of higher government bodies in European integration processes of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1