Bullying and mobbing (harassment) as types of violent attacks on an individual

O. Ostapenko
{"title":"Bullying and mobbing (harassment) as types of violent attacks on an individual","authors":"O. Ostapenko","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes theoretical provisions, existing legal acts that regulate relations related to the application of administrative responsibility for committing bullying or mobbing (harassment). In particular, it was found out that a broad list of violent acts, which manifest themselves in the form of bullying and mobbing (harassment), is enshrined in Articles 173-4, 173-5 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. Among various manifestations of violence, the aggressive behavior of a person who commits violent acts against another person is noted. Taking into account the relevance of the protection of administrative and legal relations, which are violated in the form of bullying or mobbing, the characteristics of these terms are considered and their types are distinguished. In addition, the signs that characterize administrative responsibility for committing harassment have been determined. It is noted that police officers have the authority to draw up a report on bullying (Art. 255 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses), the case is reviewed and a decision is made by the court (Art. 221 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses). Protocols about the fact of committing mobbing according to Art. 230-1 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses, officials authorized by the head of the central executive authority, which implements state policy on the supervision and control of compliance with labor legislation, as well as sub-departmental review of mobbing cases, have the right to make and make decisions on them court (Art. 221 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses). It is emphasized that subjects who commit violent acts or inaction in the form of bullying or mobbing can be conditionally systematized into certain groups. It is noted that distinguishing between violent and non-violent actions, which are carried out in the form of harassment during their legal qualification, is a rather difficult task. Harmful consequences must occur in order to qualify as illegal acts that are committed through harassment. Designation of non-violent actions should indicate not only the existence of relevant actions, but also the subjective attitude of the person who commits them to such actions. The relationship between types of administrative fines and sanctions for committing bullying/mobbing was analyzed.","PeriodicalId":421282,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":" 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes theoretical provisions, existing legal acts that regulate relations related to the application of administrative responsibility for committing bullying or mobbing (harassment). In particular, it was found out that a broad list of violent acts, which manifest themselves in the form of bullying and mobbing (harassment), is enshrined in Articles 173-4, 173-5 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses. Among various manifestations of violence, the aggressive behavior of a person who commits violent acts against another person is noted. Taking into account the relevance of the protection of administrative and legal relations, which are violated in the form of bullying or mobbing, the characteristics of these terms are considered and their types are distinguished. In addition, the signs that characterize administrative responsibility for committing harassment have been determined. It is noted that police officers have the authority to draw up a report on bullying (Art. 255 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses), the case is reviewed and a decision is made by the court (Art. 221 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses). Protocols about the fact of committing mobbing according to Art. 230-1 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses, officials authorized by the head of the central executive authority, which implements state policy on the supervision and control of compliance with labor legislation, as well as sub-departmental review of mobbing cases, have the right to make and make decisions on them court (Art. 221 of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses). It is emphasized that subjects who commit violent acts or inaction in the form of bullying or mobbing can be conditionally systematized into certain groups. It is noted that distinguishing between violent and non-violent actions, which are carried out in the form of harassment during their legal qualification, is a rather difficult task. Harmful consequences must occur in order to qualify as illegal acts that are committed through harassment. Designation of non-violent actions should indicate not only the existence of relevant actions, but also the subjective attitude of the person who commits them to such actions. The relationship between types of administrative fines and sanctions for committing bullying/mobbing was analyzed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欺凌和聚众闹事(骚扰)是针对个人的暴力攻击类型
文章分析了理论条款、规范与实施欺凌或聚众闹事(骚扰)的行政责任有关的关系的现行法律法 规。特别是,《乌克兰行政违法法典》第 173-4 条和第 173-5 条规定了以欺凌和聚众闹事(骚扰)为表现形式的一系列暴力行为。在各种暴力表现形式中,对他人实施暴力行为者的攻击性行为受到关注。考虑到保护以欺凌或聚众闹事形式受到侵犯的行政和法律关系的相关性,考虑了这些术语的特点并区分了其类型。此外,还确定了骚扰行为行政责任的特征标志。据指出,警察有权起草关于欺凌的报告(《乌克兰行政违法法典》第 255 条),案件由法院审查并做出裁决(《乌克兰行政违法法典》第 221 条)。根据《乌克兰行政违法法典》第230-1条,关于聚众滋事事实的议定书。苺 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 郱訄訇迮郱郈迮迮郇郇 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 赲迡郈郋赲迡郇郋 迡迮郈訄赲 苺郕訄郇邽 230-1 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 郱訄訇迮郱郈迮迮郇郇 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 赲迡郈郋赲迡郇郋 迡迮郈訄赲 苺郕訄郇邽 221.苺 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕赲 苺郕訄郇邽 郱訄郕郋郇郋郈郋迮郕赲.值得注意的是,区分在其合法资格期间以骚扰形式实施的暴力行为和非暴力行为是一项相当困难的任务。通过骚扰实施的非法行为必须造成危害后果。非暴力行为的认定不仅要说明相关行为的存在,还要说明实施者对此类行为的主观态度。分析了行政罚款类型与欺凌/聚众闹事处罚之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Canonical pedagogy in metaphysical law Peculiarities of the introduction of the joint transit procedure in Ukraine Cyber security of the banking sector of Ukraine: concepts, problems and experience of foreign countries Measures to ensure the institutional independence of the judiciary The role of higher government bodies in European integration processes of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1