Trade and Peace Revisited

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Integration Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.11130/jei.2023.38.4.529
Kyeongbae Kim
{"title":"Trade and Peace Revisited","authors":"Kyeongbae Kim","doi":"10.11130/jei.2023.38.4.529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing literature on trade and peace has not definitively established whether bilateral trade reduces the probability of militarized conflict. While estimated effects remain highly sensitive to empirical specifications, a commonly overlooked aspect within this literature is the insufficient consideration of potential heterogeneous relationships across country pairs and the temporal dependence of conflicts. In this paper, we present supportive evidence of the pacifying effect of trade when both heterogeneity and temporal dependence are simultaneously taken into account. By applying the Arellano-Bond model to datasets from Keshk, Pollins, and Reuveny (2004) and Hegre, Oneal, and Russett (2010), which respectively indicated no and negative effects of trade on conflict, we find that bilateral trade significantly reduces the likelihood of conflict in both datasets. This finding adds further support to liberal claims regarding the interconnected nature of economic interdependence and conflict.","PeriodicalId":45678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Integration","volume":"345 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2023.38.4.529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The existing literature on trade and peace has not definitively established whether bilateral trade reduces the probability of militarized conflict. While estimated effects remain highly sensitive to empirical specifications, a commonly overlooked aspect within this literature is the insufficient consideration of potential heterogeneous relationships across country pairs and the temporal dependence of conflicts. In this paper, we present supportive evidence of the pacifying effect of trade when both heterogeneity and temporal dependence are simultaneously taken into account. By applying the Arellano-Bond model to datasets from Keshk, Pollins, and Reuveny (2004) and Hegre, Oneal, and Russett (2010), which respectively indicated no and negative effects of trade on conflict, we find that bilateral trade significantly reduces the likelihood of conflict in both datasets. This finding adds further support to liberal claims regarding the interconnected nature of economic interdependence and conflict.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重温贸易与和平
关于贸易与和平的现有文献尚未明确确定双边贸易是否会降低军事化冲突的概率。虽然估计效果对经验规格仍然非常敏感,但这些文献中普遍忽视的一个方面是没有充分考虑国家对之间的潜在异质性关系以及冲突的时间依赖性。在本文中,当同时考虑到异质性和时间依赖性时,我们提出了贸易平息效应的支持性证据。通过对 Keshk、Pollins 和 Reuveny(2004 年)以及 Hegre、Oneal 和 Russett(2010 年)的数据集应用阿雷拉诺-邦德模型,我们发现在这两个数据集中,双边贸易显著降低了冲突发生的可能性。这一发现进一步支持了自由主义关于经济相互依存与冲突相互关联的主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The Empirical Study on Producer Service Industry and Economic Growth in China: Implication on Economic Integration External Debt and Economic Vulnerability: An International Evidence Examining the Impact of Environmental Pollution and Life Expectancy on Economic Growth in the European Union Trade Liberalization, International Relocation of Firms, and Economic Growth Assessing the Association Between Trade and Regional Trade Agreements: A Network Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1