An assessment of local community engagement in wildlife conservation: A case study of the Save Valley Conservancy, South Eastern Zimbabwe 评估当地社区保护野生动物的参与度:以津巴布韦东南部的Save Valley Conservancy为例

Itai Dhliwayo, Never Muboko, Given Matseketsa, Edson Gandiwa
{"title":"An assessment of local community engagement in wildlife conservation: A case study of the Save Valley Conservancy, South Eastern Zimbabwe\n 评估当地社区保护野生动物的参与度:以津巴布韦东南部的Save Valley Conservancy为例","authors":"Itai Dhliwayo,&nbsp;Never Muboko,&nbsp;Given Matseketsa,&nbsp;Edson Gandiwa","doi":"10.1002/inc3.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In southern Africa, human and wildlife interactions have significantly increased over the past decade, resulting in complex conservation conflicts. As humans and wildlife share space, stakeholder engagement becomes a critical component of wildlife management and transformative conservation. We analysed the conservation conflicts in the Save Valley Conservancy (SVC) in south-eastern Zimbabwe. Data were collected between April and May 2020 through focus group discussions and interviews with purposively sampled informants. Qualitative and quantitative research methods were adopted in this study. The results revealed that the absence of an effective, inclusive, integrated multi-cross-sectional stakeholder engagement plan is a primary contributing factor to conservation conflicts in the SVC. In conclusion, our study found that community participation in land use decision-making is limited within the SVC, and this is a general lack of consensus among the community members on viable land use options. This study proposes an integrated, cross-sectional stakeholder working framework that not only informs conservation practitioners but also fully addresses the prevailing conservation conflict scenarios. These conflicts emanate from the exclusion of humans from protected areas and the encroachment of wildlife in human settlements.</p>","PeriodicalId":100680,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Conservation","volume":"2 4","pages":"226-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/inc3.31","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inc3.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In southern Africa, human and wildlife interactions have significantly increased over the past decade, resulting in complex conservation conflicts. As humans and wildlife share space, stakeholder engagement becomes a critical component of wildlife management and transformative conservation. We analysed the conservation conflicts in the Save Valley Conservancy (SVC) in south-eastern Zimbabwe. Data were collected between April and May 2020 through focus group discussions and interviews with purposively sampled informants. Qualitative and quantitative research methods were adopted in this study. The results revealed that the absence of an effective, inclusive, integrated multi-cross-sectional stakeholder engagement plan is a primary contributing factor to conservation conflicts in the SVC. In conclusion, our study found that community participation in land use decision-making is limited within the SVC, and this is a general lack of consensus among the community members on viable land use options. This study proposes an integrated, cross-sectional stakeholder working framework that not only informs conservation practitioners but also fully addresses the prevailing conservation conflict scenarios. These conflicts emanate from the exclusion of humans from protected areas and the encroachment of wildlife in human settlements.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当地社区参与野生动物保护的评估:津巴布韦东南部拯救谷保护区案例研究
在南部非洲,人类与野生动物的互动在过去十年中显著增加,导致了复杂的保护冲突。由于人类与野生动物共享空间,利益相关者的参与成为野生动物管理和转型保护的关键组成部分。我们分析了津巴布韦东南部拯救谷保护区(SVC)的保护冲突。我们在 2020 年 4 月至 5 月期间通过焦点小组讨论和有针对性地抽取信息提供者进行访谈的方式收集数据。本研究采用了定性和定量研究方法。研究结果表明,缺乏有效、包容、综合的多部门利益相关者参与计划是造成小流域保护冲突的主要因素。总之,我们的研究发现,在小流域内,社区参与土地使用决策的程度有限,社区成员对可行的土地使用方案普遍缺乏共识。本研究提出了一个综合的、跨部门的利益相关者工作框架,它不仅能为保护工作者提供信息,还能充分解决普遍存在的保护冲突问题。这些冲突源于人类被排斥在保护区之外,以及野生动物对人类居住区的侵占。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Two Faces of Introgression in Conservation Biology 基因渗入在保育生物学中的双重面貌 Rare Records of Tropical Spiders Preying on Vertebrates in Southwest China 热带地区罕见的蜘蛛捕食脊椎动物记录:来自中国西南部的四例观察 Can Distance Sampling be Used to Estimate the Abundance of Mountain Ungulates? A Comparison of Distance Sampling and Double-Observer Survey Methods 距离样线法能用于估算山地有蹄类动物的数量吗?——距离样线法与双观察者法的比较 Staghorn Ferns in Botanical Gardens: Which Species Do We Really Cultivate or Trade? 植物园中的鹿角蕨:我们真正保育或买卖的是什么?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1