Ground-Motion Variability for Ruptures on Rough Faults

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1785/0120230117
J. Vyas, M. Galis, P. M. Mai
{"title":"Ground-Motion Variability for Ruptures on Rough Faults","authors":"J. Vyas, M. Galis, P. M. Mai","doi":"10.1785/0120230117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Fault roughness influences earthquake rupture dynamics, seismic energy radiation, and, hence, resulting ground motion and its variability. Using 3D dynamic rupture simulations considering a range of rough-fault realizations, we investigate the effects of rupture complexity caused by fault roughness on ground-motion variability, that is, the variability of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and velocity (PGV) as a function of distance. In our analysis, we vary hypocenter locations (leading to unilateral and bilateral ruptures) and fault roughness amplitude to generate a set of magnitude M ≈ 7 strike-slip dynamic rupture simulations. Synthetic seismic waveforms computed on a dense set of surface sites (maximum resolved frequency 5.75 Hz) form our database for detailed statistical analyses. For unilateral ruptures, our simulations reveal that ground-shaking variability (in terms of PGA and PGV) remains nearly constant with increasing distance from the fault. In contrast, bilateral ruptures lead to slowly decreasing ground-motion variability with increasing distance in the near field (less than 20 km). The variability becomes almost constant at large fault distances. We also find that low-amplitude fault roughness leads to ruptures that are likely to generate higher PGA variability than events on faults with high-amplitude roughness. Increasing fault roughness distorts the radiation pattern, thereby reducing directivity effects and, hence, potentially lowering ground-motion variability. The average PGV variability from our rough-fault rupture models is consistent with estimates from empirical ground-motion models (GMMs). However, the average PGA variability exceeds the variability encoded in empirical GMMs by nearly 20%. Hence, our findings have implications for near-source ground-motion prediction in seismic hazard studies, because ground-motion variability depends on details of the earthquake rupture process and is larger than GMM estimates.","PeriodicalId":9444,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","volume":"253 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fault roughness influences earthquake rupture dynamics, seismic energy radiation, and, hence, resulting ground motion and its variability. Using 3D dynamic rupture simulations considering a range of rough-fault realizations, we investigate the effects of rupture complexity caused by fault roughness on ground-motion variability, that is, the variability of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and velocity (PGV) as a function of distance. In our analysis, we vary hypocenter locations (leading to unilateral and bilateral ruptures) and fault roughness amplitude to generate a set of magnitude M ≈ 7 strike-slip dynamic rupture simulations. Synthetic seismic waveforms computed on a dense set of surface sites (maximum resolved frequency 5.75 Hz) form our database for detailed statistical analyses. For unilateral ruptures, our simulations reveal that ground-shaking variability (in terms of PGA and PGV) remains nearly constant with increasing distance from the fault. In contrast, bilateral ruptures lead to slowly decreasing ground-motion variability with increasing distance in the near field (less than 20 km). The variability becomes almost constant at large fault distances. We also find that low-amplitude fault roughness leads to ruptures that are likely to generate higher PGA variability than events on faults with high-amplitude roughness. Increasing fault roughness distorts the radiation pattern, thereby reducing directivity effects and, hence, potentially lowering ground-motion variability. The average PGV variability from our rough-fault rupture models is consistent with estimates from empirical ground-motion models (GMMs). However, the average PGA variability exceeds the variability encoded in empirical GMMs by nearly 20%. Hence, our findings have implications for near-source ground-motion prediction in seismic hazard studies, because ground-motion variability depends on details of the earthquake rupture process and is larger than GMM estimates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
崎岖断层破裂的地动变异性
断层粗糙度会影响地震破裂动力学、地震能量辐射,进而产生地动及其变异性。我们利用三维动态破裂模拟,考虑了一系列粗糙断层的实际情况,研究了断层粗糙度导致的破裂复杂性对地动变异性的影响,即峰值地面加速度(PGA)和速度(PGV)随距离变化的变异性。在分析中,我们改变了次中心位置(导致单侧和双侧断裂)和断层粗糙度振幅,生成了一组震级 M≈7 的走向滑动动态断裂模拟。在密集的地表点(最大分辨频率为 5.75 Hz)上计算的合成地震波形构成了我们的数据库,用于详细的统计分析。对于单侧破裂,我们的模拟结果表明,地震动变异性(以 PGA 和 PGV 计)随着与断层距离的增加而几乎保持不变。相比之下,双边断裂导致地震动变异性随着近场(小于 20 千米)距离的增加而缓慢减小。断层距离较大时,地动变率几乎保持不变。我们还发现,与高振幅粗糙度断层上的事件相比,低振幅断层粗糙度导致的破裂可能产生更高的 PGA 变异性。断层粗糙度的增加会扭曲辐射模式,从而降低指向性效应,因此有可能降低地动变异性。我们的粗糙断层破裂模型得出的平均 PGV 变异性与经验地动模型(GMM)的估计值一致。然而,平均 PGA 变异性比经验地动模型编码的变异性高出近 20%。因此,我们的研究结果对地震灾害研究中的近源地动预测具有重要意义,因为地动变率取决于地震破裂过程的细节,并且大于 GMM 估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, commonly referred to as BSSA, (ISSN 0037-1106) is the premier journal of advanced research in earthquake seismology and related disciplines. It first appeared in 1911 and became a bimonthly in 1963. Each issue is composed of scientific papers on the various aspects of seismology, including investigation of specific earthquakes, theoretical and observational studies of seismic waves, inverse methods for determining the structure of the Earth or the dynamics of the earthquake source, seismometry, earthquake hazard and risk estimation, seismotectonics, and earthquake engineering. Special issues focus on important earthquakes or rapidly changing topics in seismology. BSSA is published by the Seismological Society of America.
期刊最新文献
Broadband Ground‐Motion Synthesis via Generative Adversarial Neural Operators: Development and Validation Site‐Specific Ground‐Motion Waveform Generation Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network and Generalized Inversion Technique Ground‐Motion Model for Small‐to‐Moderate Potentially Induced Earthquakes Using an Ensemble Machine Learning Approach for CENA Stochastic Simulation of Pulse‐Like Ground Motions Using Wavelet Packets Imaging Upper‐Mantle Anisotropy with Transdimensional Bayesian Monte Carlo Sampling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1